Skip to main content
Log in

Quality analysis of DSA equipment

  • Originals
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the framework of a quality analysis project for the improvement of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) equipment, an inventory was made of the image quality and radiation dose of DSA equipments in six hospitals in the Netherlands. The image quality was investigated with a contrast detail (CD) phantom. The entrance dose of the radiation on this phantom and the skin dose at the level of the eye lenses and the thyroid gland were measured in these hospitals using a human phantom during a standardised simulated DSA examination of the aortic arch and brachiocephalic arteries, by means of thermo-luminescence dosimeters (TLD). To establish the relation of these measurements on the human phantom and real patient examinations, the same measurements were carried out in our own hospital on 16 patients during a comparable DSA examination. To find the difference from the dose in conventional angiography (CA) the same measurements were carried out in our hospital on 11 patients during a comparable examination. These dose measurements were also carried out on the human phantom with the use of the same CA equipment. We vound large differences in image quality in the various hospitals. Within one hospital, monitor images were better than hard copy images. These differences were strongly related to the amount of radiation used, to the technique of storing the images (digital or analogue) and to the quality of the equipment used to make hard copies (the imager). Recommendations are made for improvement and quality control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thijssen HOM, Merx JL, Mostart JEJM, Thijssen MAO, Wong Chung R, Schoonderwaldt H, Keyser A (1988) Comparison of brachiocephalic angiography and IVDSA in the same group of patients. Neuroradiology 30:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thijssen HOM, Merx JL, Thijsen MAO, Keyser A, Schoonderwaldt H, Wong Chung R (1988) Improvement of IVDSA of the brachiocephalic arteries using a non-ionic contrast medium. Neuroradiology 30:211–213

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rose A (1974) Vision, human and electronic. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ohara K, Chan HP, Doi K, Giger ML, Fujita H (1986) Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images. Am Assoc Phys Med 13:304–311

    Google Scholar 

  5. ICRP publication (1984) Non-stochastic effects of ionizing radiation. Ann ICRP 41:14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Starr JS, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenough DJ (1975) Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. Radiology 116:533–538

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thijssen MAO (1983) Receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic imaging, Diagn Imag Clin Med 52:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  8. Starr JS, Metz CE, Lusted LB (1977) Comments on the generalization of receiver operating characteristic analysis to detection and localization tasks. Phys Med Biol 22:376–379

    Google Scholar 

  9. ICRP Publication (1977) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 26

  10. Thijssen MAO, Rosenbush G, Gerlach H (1988) Exposure reduction in fluoroscopy. Elektromedica 4:10–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thijssen, M.A.O., Thijssen, H.O.M., Merx, J.L. et al. Quality analysis of DSA equipment. Neuroradiology 30, 561–568 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339702

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339702

Key words

Navigation