Advertisement

Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 537–547 | Cite as

On the hibernation of Spongilla lacustris (L.)

  • Erik Zeuthen
Article

Summary

The osmotic pressure of the summer-sponge is about 25–30 mM NaCl. At and after gemmulation it increases to about 110 mM (in a single case 175 mM was found), due to a liberation of small organic molecules. Osmotic pressure remains constant for a time, but in January and February (i. e. before the germination) it is again reduced to the summer values. The shell allows a high hydrostatic pressure to develop and thereby prevents osmotic rupture of the gemmula. The hibernation may be divided into three periods: The prehibernation, the posthibernation and intercalated between them the hibernation proper. In the prehibernation and in the posthibernation definite changes take place in the tissue, but in the hibernation proper no changes are observed. In Nature the hibernation lasts about six months at, say, 4°, but at 22 degrees the whole hibernation will abbreviate to about 13 days.

This is due to an abbreviation of all the three periods of hibernation, but whereas the pre- and the posthibernation will only be accelerated in a manner similiar to that of other physiological processes, such as processes of growth, development and metabolism, the hibernation proper will be accelerated much more, and in fact it will be almost abolished at 22°. This strange effect of temperature on hibernation proper is discussed. Since development often occurs at very low temperatures (2–5°), we may conclude that a mechanism must be present in the gemmulae which ensures development after a certain time, here 6 months. The different phases of hibernation may serve as an indicator of this mechanism. It is suggested, that the transformations taking place during prehibernation and posthibernation, and resulting in the germination of the gemmula are inhibited during hibernation proper by a substance formed in prehibernation.

Keywords

Hydrostatic Pressure Physiological Process Organic Molecule Osmotic Pressure Single Case 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldes, E. J.: A micromethod of measuring osmotic pressure. J. of Sci. instr. 11, 223–225 (1934).Google Scholar
  2. Grassmann, Heyde: Alkalimetrische Bestimmung der Aminosäuren und Peptide. Z. physiol. Chem. 183, 32–38 (1930).Google Scholar
  3. Gray, J.: The osmotic properties of the eggs of the trout (Salmo fario). J. of exper Biol. 9, 277–299 (1932).Google Scholar
  4. Hagedorn, H. C.: Undersøgelser vedrørende Blodsukkerregulationen hos Mennesket. Diss. Copenhagen 1921.Google Scholar
  5. Krogh, Aug.: The rate of development and CO2 production of chrysalides of Tenebrio molitor at different temperatures. Z. allgem. Physiol. 16, 178–180 (1914).Google Scholar
  6. - Osmotic Regulation in Aquatic animals. London 1939 (in the press).Google Scholar
  7. Krogh, Aug. and H. H. Ussing: A note of the permeability of trout's eggs to D2O and H2O. J. of exper. Biol. 14, 35–37 (1937).Google Scholar
  8. Pourbaix, Nelly: Sur la mecanisme d'accumulation des reserves dans les gemmules des Spongillidae. Mem. de Musee roy. d'Hist. Nat. Belg. 2. s., 3, 415–419 (1936).Google Scholar
  9. Wierzejski, A.: Süßwasserspongien. Monographische Bearbeitung. Mem. de l'Acad. Polon. des Sci. et des Lettres. Serie B. Cracovie 1935.Google Scholar
  10. Wigglesworth, V. B.: A simple method of volumetric analysis for small quantities of fluid. Estimation of chloride in 0,3 μ1 of tissue fluid. Biochem. J. 31, 1719–22 (1937).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1939

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Zeuthen
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of ZoophysiologyCopenhagen UniversityDenmark

Personalised recommendations