Abstract
This paper describes a model under which the maximization of option value leads to a preference for biological diversity arising from potential substitutability among species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, G. M. and Goldstein, J. H. (1984), ‘A Model for Valuing Endangered Species,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 303–309.
Gower, J. C. (1966), ‘Some Distance Properties of Latent Root and Vector Methods Used in Multivariate Analysis,’ Biometrika 53, 325–338.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964), ‘Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method,’ Psychometrika 29, 115–129.
Rodman, J. E. (1991), ‘A Taxonomic Analysis of Glucosinolate-Producing Plants, Part 1: Phenetics,’ Systematic Botany, 16, 598–618.
Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. (1973), Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco: W.H.Freeman.
Solow, A., Polasky, S. and Broadus, J. (1993), ‘On the Measurement of Biological Diversity’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, in press.
Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J., and Williams, P. H. (1991), ‘What to Protect—Systematics and the Agony of Choice,’ Biological Conservation 55, 235–254.
Weitzman, M. (1992), ‘On Diversity,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 363–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polasky, S., Solow, A. & Broadus, J. Searching for uncertain benefits and the conservation of biological diversity. Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 171–181 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00338783
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00338783