Summary
-
1.
In Dactylis glomerata subsp. lusitanica some populations were found to have supernumeraries. These supernumeraries were somatically stable, heterochromatic and had sub-median centromeres. At metaphase I they were about half the size of the smallest euchromatic chromosomes.
-
2.
At diakinesis and metaphase I, the supernumeraries formed bivalents and multivalents in moderately high frequency. Some multivalent configurations had triple-chiasmata. There were no differences in the chiasma frequencies in supernumeraries between various genotypes with two supernumeraries except in the case of comparisons involving the asynaptic plant. The two genotypes with 4 supernumeraries also did not differ in this respect.
-
3.
In plant Dgl 585-3 (2n+3s) the chiasma frequency in supernumeraries differed highly significantly in two years, while with respect to the normal set the differences were insignificant.
-
4.
Anaphase I separation was studied in plants with one and two supernumeraries. In plants with one supernumerary both non-disjunction and the division of the univalent supernumerary were found. In plants with two supernumeraries the two supernumeraries on the whole disjoined regularly to the two poles. In the asynaptic plant (2n+2s), where the two supernumeraries were present as univalents in most of the cells, in only one cell out of 72 had one of the supernumeraries divided. The data on lagging supernumeraries at both the meiotic divisions, indicate a correlation between the extent of pairing of supernumeraries and a reduction in frequency of laggards. Thus in this respect they resemble the normal set.
-
5.
Data were also collected with respect to the position of the univalent supernumerary on the spindle at metaphase I and the effect of supernumeraries on morphological characters and pollen fertility.
-
6.
Asynapsis seems to affect the supernumeraries much more than the normal chromosomes. A higher frequency of non-chiasmate associations between supernumeraries and the normal set was found to be associated with asynapsis. In spite of a very low pairing in supernumeraries under the influence of asynapsis, they disjoined regularly to the poles.
-
7.
Evidence was found for the non-disjunction of supernumeraries at pollen mitosis in Dactylis. The variance for the case when supernumeraries were transmitted from the male side was significantly higher.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beadle, G. W.: Further studies of asynaptic maize. Cytologia (Tokyo) 4, 269–287 1933); - Crossing over in attached- × triploids of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 29, 277–309 (1934).
Bosemark, N. O.: On accessory chromosomes in Festuca pratensis. 1. Cytological investigations. Hereditas (Lund) 40, 346–376 (1954); - Further studies on accessory chromosomes in grasses. Hereditas (Lund) 43, 236–297 (1957).
Bridges, C. B., and E. G. Anderson: Crossing over in the X chromosomes of triploid females of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 10, 418–441 (1925).
Clausen, R. E.: Inheritance in Nicotiana tabacum. XI. The fluted assemblage. Amer. Naturalist 65, 316–331 (1931).
Darlington, C. D., and P. T. Thomas: Morbid mitosis and the activity of inert chromosomes in Sorghum. Proc. roy. Soc. B 130, 127–150 (1941).
—, and M. B. Upcott: The activity of inert chromosomes in Zea Mays. J. Genet. 41, 275–296 (1941).
Fröst, S.: The cytological behaviour of accessory chromosomes in Centaurea scabiosa. Hereditas (Lund) 42, 415–431 (1956); - The cytological behavior and mode of transmission of accessory chromosomes in Plantago serraria. Hereditas (Lund) 45, 191–210 (1959).
—, and G. Östergren: Crepis pannonica and Crepis conyzaefolia two more species having accessory chromosomes. Hereditas (Lund) 45, 211–215 (1959)
Frost, J. N.: Preferential segregation in triploid females. Genetics 46, 373–392 (1961).
Gay, H.: Nucleocytoplasmic relations in Drosophila. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 21, 257–270 (1956).
Håkansson, A.: Meiosis and pollen mitosis in rye plants with many accessory chromosomes. Hereditas (Lund) 43, 603–620 (1957).
Hollingshead, L.: Cytological investigations of hybrids and hybrid derivatives of Crepis capillaris and Crepis tectorum. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agr. Sci. 6, 55–94 (1930).
Koller, P. C.: Asynapsis in Pisum sativum. J. Genet. 36, 275–306 (1938).
Longley, A. E.: Supernumerary chromosomes in Zea mays. J. Agric. Res. 35, 769–784 (1927).
McCollum, G. D.: A cytological study of natural and induced tetraploids in Dactylis. Ph. D. thesis Univ. Calif., Davis 1958.
Melander, Y.: Accessory chromosomes in animals, especially in Polycelis tenuis. Hereditas (Lund) 36, 19–38 (1950).
Michie, D.: Affinity: A new genetic phenomena in the house mouse. Nature (Lond.) 171, 26 (1953).
Müntzing, A.: Different chromosome numbers in root tips and pollen mother cells in a sexual strain of Poa alpina. Hereditas (Lund) 32, 127–129 (1946); - Cytological studies of extra fragment chromosomes in rye. IV. The position of various fragment types in somatic plates. Hereditas (Lund) 34, 161–180 (1948); - Accessory chromosomes. Trans. Bose. Res. Inst. 22, 1–15 (1958).
Östergren, G.: Heterochromatic B-chromosomes in Anthoxanthum. Hereditas (Lund), 33, 261–296 (1947).
Prakken, R.: Studies of asynapsis in rye. Hereditas (Lund) 29, 475–495 (1943).
Roman, H.: Mitotic non-disjunction in the case of interchanges involving the B-type chromosomes in maize. Genetics 32, 391–409 (1947).
Rothfels, K. H.: Chromosome complement, polyploidy, and supernumeraries in Neopodismopsis abdominalis (Acrididae). J. Morph. 87, 287–316 (1950).
Rutishauser, A.: Genetics of fragment chromosomes in Trillium grandiflorum. Heredity 10, 195–204 (1956).
Sandler, L., and E. Nowitsky: Evidence for genetic homology between chromosomes I and IV in Drosophila melanogaster with a proposed explanation for the crowding effect in triploids. Genetics 41, 189–193 (1956).
Shah, S. S.: “Studies on plants with abnormal chromosome numbers in genus Dactylis”. Ph. D. thesis submitted Univ. Calif. Davis.
Snedecor, G. W.: Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology, 4th ed. Iowa State College Press. Iowa: 1946.
—, and M. R. Irwin: On the chi-square test for homogeneity. Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 8, 75–81 (1933).
Stebbins, G. L., and D. Zohary: Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies in the genus Dactylis. I. The morphology, distribution, and interrelationships of the diploid subspecies. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 31 (1), 1–39 (1959).
Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie: Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1960.
Stevens, N. M.: The chromosomes in Diabrotica vittata, Diabrotica sorror, and Diabrotica 12-punctata. A contribution to the literature on heterochromosomes and sex determination. J. exp. Zool. 5, 453–470 (1908).
Swanson, C. P.: Cytology and cytogenetics. Englewood Cliffs (N. J.): Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1957.
Vaarama, A.: Chromosome fragmentation and accessory chromosomes in Orthotrichum tenellum. Hereditas (Lund) 39, 305–316 (1953a); - Some chromosome numbers of California and Finnish moss species. Bryologist 56 (3), 169–177 (1953b).
Virkki, N.: Akzessorische Chromosomen bei zwei Käfern, Epicomatis hirta Poda und Oryctes nasicornis L. (Scarabaeidae). Ann. Acad. Sci. fenn. A. IV, 26 1–19 (1954).
White, M. J. D.: Animal cytology and evolution, 2nd edit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1954.
Zohary, D., and I. Ashkenazi: Different frequencies of supernumerary chromosomes in diploid populations of Dactylis glomerata in Israel. Nature (Lond.) 182, 477–478 (1958).
—, and V. Nur: Natural triploids in the orchard grass, Dactylis glomerata L. polyploid complex and their significance for gene flow from diploid to tetraploid levels. Evolution 13, 311–317 (1959).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Partly based on a dissertation submitted to the Graduate Division, Northern Section, of the University of California in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, S.S. Studies on supernumerary chromosomes in the genus Dactylis. Chromosoma 14, 162–185 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336758
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336758