Skip to main content
Log in

Duct-drained versus duct-occluded pancreatic grafts: a personal view

  • Point of View
  • Published:
Transplant International

Conclusion

My personal experience with DO and BD pancreas transplantation confirms that the DO technique is a safe procedure associated with more frequent, but less serious, complications. However, because of the likelihood of vascular thrombosis, graft survival probability does not reach the same level as that achieved by the BD technique.

With triple drug induction therapy, recipients of BD pancreatic grafts often experience severe rejection episodes requiring intense antirejection therapy. Subsequently, the compromised immune system increases the susceptibility of the recipients to life-threatening infections. However, improved prophylactic and therapeutic measures, such as quadruple immunosuppressive induction therapy, CMV prophylaxis, and effective antifungal drugs, are now available. Therefore, these complications may now be prevented or effectively treated in most cases.

The BD technique provides methods for diagnosing early graft rejection, which is obviously of major importance in isolated pancreas transplantation. Nevertheless, the further development of markers for early graft rejection, as well as of immunosuppressive approaches, seems necessary in order to improve the results of isolated pancreas transplantation. When the pancreas is transplanted simultaneously with a kidney using the BD technique, the probability of survival for both grafts is excellent. The problems directly associated with BD may be solved by draining the pancreatic duct to the intestine, which may ultimately prove to be the method that should be given preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boudreaux JP, Nealon WH, Carson RC, Fish JC (1990) Pancreatitis necessitating urinary undiversion in a bladder-drained pancreas transplant. Transplant Proc 22: 641–642

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brekke IB (1991) Indications and results of pancreatic transplantation. The Oslo experience, 1983–1990. Diabetologia 34 [Suppl 1]: 18–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brekke IB, Gullesen I, Refsum SB, Flatmark A (1980) Long-term endocrine function of duct-ligated pancreas isotransplants in rats. Eur Surg Res 12: 167–178

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke GW, Gruessner R, Dunn DL, Sutherland DER (1990) Conversion of whole pancreaticoduodenal transplants from bladder to enteric drainage for metabolic acidosis or dysuria. Transplant Proc 22: 651–652

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castoldi R, Staudacher C, Ferrari G, Carlucci M, Di Francesco A, Caldara R, Secchi A, Pozza G, Di Carlo V (1990) Early postoperative surgical complications after combined segmental ductoccluded pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 22: 582–584

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conway MB, Saunders R, Munn SR, Perkins JD (1990) Combined liver/pancreaticoduodenal procurement effect on allograft function. Transplant Proc 22: 429–430

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cook K, Sollinger HW, Warner T, Kamps D, Belzer FO (1983) Pancreaticocystostomy: an alternative method for exocrine drainage of segmental pancreatic allografts. Transplantation 35: 634–636

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubernard JM, Trager J, Neyra P, Touraine JL, Tranchant D, Blanc Brunett N (1978) A new method of preparation of segmental pancreatic grafts for transplantation: trials in dogs and in man. Surgery 84: 633–639

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubernard JM, Martinenghi S, Martin X, Gelet A, Lefrancois N, Sanverino R, Betuel H, Pozza G (1990) Pancreatic transplantation in Lyon: the whole series. Transplant Proc 22: 595–596

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn DL, Schlumpf RB, Gruessner RWG, Morel P, Mayoral JL, Payne WD, Matas AJ, Sutherland DER, Moudry-Munns KC, Najarian JS (1990) Maximal use of liver and pancreas from cadaveric organ donors. Transplant Proc 22: 423–424

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elkhammas EA, Henry ML, Tesi RJ, Sommer BG, Ferguson RM (1991) Control of metabolic acidosis after pancreas transplantation using acetazolamide. Transplant Proc 23: 1623–1624

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frisk B, Hedman L, Brynger H (1987) Pancreaticocystostomy with a two-layer anastomosis technique in human segmental pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 44: 836–837

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garvin PJ, Lindsey L, Aridge DL, Burton FR, Patel BK, George E, Reese J (1991) Treatment of late allograft pancreatitis with oral pancreatic extract. Transplantation 52: 733–735

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gliedman ML, Gold M, Whittaker J, Rifkin H, Soberman R, Freed S, Tellis V, Veith FJ (1973) Pancreatic duct to ureter anastomosis for exocrine drainage in pancreatic transplantation. Am J Surg 125: 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  15. Groth CG, Tyden G (1988) Segmental pancreatic transplantation with enteric exocrine drainage. In: Groth CG (ed) Pancreatic transplantation. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gruessner RWG, Dunn DL, Tzardis PJ, Nakhleh RI, Najarian JS, Sutherland DER (1990) Complications occurring after whole organ duodenopancreatic transplantation: relation to the allograft duodenal segment. Transplant Proc 22: 578–579

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holdaas H, Brekke IB, Hartmann A, Bentdal ØH, Ganes T, Gjellstad A, Fauchald P, Berg LJ, Djøseland O, Jervell J, Flatmark A (1991) Long-term metabolic control in recipients of combined pancreas and kidney transplants. Diabetologia 34 [Suppl 1]: 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  18. Illner WD, Abendroth D, Landgraf R, Land W (1988) Pancreatic transplantation using the duct occlusion technique. Clin Transplant 2: 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  19. Illner WD, Hancke E, Welter HF, Abendroth D, Theodorakis J, Vogler G, Landgraf R, Land W (1990) The first Munich experience with the bladder technique in pancreatic transplantation. Transplant Proc 22: 594

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kyriakides GK, Rabinovitch A, Mintz D, Olson L, Rappaport FT, Miller J (1981) Long-term study of vascularized free draining intraperitoneal pancreatic segmental allografts in beagle dogs. J Clin Invest 67: 292–303

    Google Scholar 

  21. La Rocca E, Martin X, Secchi A, Lefrançois N, Martinenghi S, Melandri M, Touraine JL, Pozza G, Dubernard JM (1990) Whole versus segmental pancreas graft: two years metabolic results. Transplant Proc 22: 653–654

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lillehei RC, Simmons RL, Najarian JS, Weil R, Uchida H, Ruiz JO, Kjellstrand CH, Goetz FC (1970) Pancreaticoduodenal allotransplantation: experimental and clinical experience. Ann Surg 172: 405–436

    Google Scholar 

  23. Linder R, Tyden G, Tibell A, Kubota K, Groth C-G (1990) Graft pancreatitis late after pancreatic transplantation. Transplant Proc 22: 657

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martin X, Dubernard JM, Sanseverino R, Melandri M, Faure JL, Camozzi L, Lefrancois N, La Rocca E, Gelet A (1989) Segmental duct-obliterated pancreas grafts versus pancreaticoduodenal grafts with enteric diversion. Diabetes 38: 16–17

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mittal VK, Toledo-Pereyra LH (1990) Management of delayed complications of the duodenal loop in whole organ pancreatic duodenal transplantation. Transplant Proc 22: 580–581

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morel P, Gillingham KJ, Moudry-Munns KC, Dunn DL, Najarian JS, Sutherland DER (1991) Factors influencing pancreas transplant outcome: Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of a single institution's experience with 357 cases. Transplant Proc 23: 1630–1633

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nghiem DD, Beutel WD, Corry RJ- (1986) Duodenocystostomy for exocrine pancreatic drainage in experimental and clinical pancreaticoduodenal transplantation. Transplant Proc 18: 1762–1764

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nishimura Y, Uchida H, Takemura F, Ichikawa N, Kawaguchi G, Sato Y, Shimizu K, Meigata K, Watanabe K, Beck Y, Mita K, Tomikawa S, Inoue S, Sugimoto H, Nagao T, Akiyama N (1991) Electrolyte imbalance after canine pancreatico-duodenal allotransplantation using duodenocystostomy technique. Transplant Proc 23: 1625–1627

    Google Scholar 

  29. Norstein J, Brekke IB, Holdaas H, Vatne K (1990) Arterial stenosis in duct occluded segmental pancreatic grafts treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Transplant Proc 22: 599–601

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prieto M, Sutherland DER, Fernandez-Cruz L, Heil J, Najarian JS (1987) Experimental and clinical experience with urine amylase for early diagnosis of rejection in pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 43: 73–79

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roxvall LI, Frisk B, Hedman L, Nyberg G (1988) Graft pancreatitis and hemorrhagic cystitis. Transpl Int 1: 228–229

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schang T, Timmermann W, Thiede A, Najarian JS, Sutherland DER (1991) Detrimental effects of fluid and electrolyte loss from duodenum in bladder-drained, pancreas transplants. Transplant Proc 23: 1617–1618

    Google Scholar 

  33. See WA, Smith JL (1991) Urinary levels of activated trypsin in whole-organ pancreas transplant patients with duodenocystostomies. Transplantation 52: 630–633

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith JL, See WA, Piper JB, Corry RJ (1991) Lower urinary tract complications in patients with duodenocystostomies for exocrine drainage of the transplanted pancreas. Transplant Proc 23: 1611–1612

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sollinger HW, Belzer FO, Kalayoglu M (1986) Transplantation of the intact pancreas organ: urinary drainage for pancreas transplantation. Transplant Immunol Lett 3: 4–6

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sollinger HW, Pirsch JD, D'Alessandro AM, Kalayoglu M Belzer FO (1990) Advantages of bladder drainage in pancreas transplantation: a personal view. Clin Transplant 4: 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stratta RJ, Sollinger HW, Perlman SB, D'Alessandro AM, Groshek M, Kalayoglu M, Pirsch JD, Belzer FO (1988) Early diagnosis and treatment of pancreas allograft rejection. Transpl Int 1: 6–12

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sutherland DER, Gillingham K, Moudry-Munns KC (1991) Results of pancreas transplantation in the United States for 1987–1990 from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry with comparison to 1984–87 results. Clin Transplant 5: 330–341

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tyden G, Tibell A, Groth C-G (1991) Pancreatico-duodenal transplantation with enteric exocrine drainage: technical aspects. Clin Transplant 5: 36–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Brekke, I.B. Duct-drained versus duct-occluded pancreatic grafts: a personal view. Transplant Int 6, 116–120 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336656

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336656

Keywords

Navigation