Abstract
In 14 children with indewelling ventriculoatrial or ventriculoperitoneal shunts, the need for continued shunt treatment was judged to be uncertain based on clinical symptoms and signs and CT scans. Ventricular outflow resistance (R0) was determined by implantation of a ventricular catheter and steady state infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) according to the formula R0 = (Pp-P0)/Infusion rate, where P0 is the opening pressure in the lateral ventricle and Pp the plateau pressure recorded at that particular infusion rate. R0 was determined during general anesthesia and stready state ventilation was ensured by mechanical ventilator. Ventricular fluid pressure (VFP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP) were recorded by standard fluid pressure transducers. The cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP = ABP-VFP) was kept above 30 mmHg by reducing the infusion rate in cases of unacceptable increase in VFP. R0 was determined with the shunt clamped. During steady state infusion at the plateau pressure the shunt was unclamped to test shunt patency. Four children had normal R0 values with the shunt clamped. Their shunts were removed. They have done well clinically, and control CT scans have not demonstrated increased ventricular size. Three children demonstrated pathologic R0 values (above 12 mmHg/ml per min) that normalized after shunt unclamping; i.e. each had a well-functioning shunt. Seven children demonstrated increased R0 values even after shunt unclamping. Their shunts were replaced, and clinical improvement has been observed in 6 of them. Ventricular infusion tests appear useful to evaluate shunt dependence and function in difficult cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Børgesen SE, Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105:65–86
Epstein F (1985) How to keep shunts functioning or “the impossible dream.” Clin Neurosurg 32:608–631
Kosteljanetz M (1985) Resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid determined by bolus injection technique and constant rate steady state infusion in humans. Neurosurgery 16:336–340
Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM (1978) A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48:332–344
Nugent GR, Al-Mefty O, Chou S (1979) Communicating hydrocephalus as a cause of aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg 51:812–818
Schutz H, Ter Brugge KG, Chiu MC, Mongul A, Taylor F (1983) Determination of CSF shunt patency with lumbar infusion test. J Neurosurg 58:553–556
Sklar FH, Beyer CW, Ramanathan M, Clark WK (1980) Servo-controlled lumbar infusions in children. A quantitative approach to the problem of arrested hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 52:87–98
Woodford J, Saunders RL, Sachs E (1976) Shunt system patency testing by lumbar infusion. J Neurosurg 45:60–65
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lundar, T. Shunt removal or replacement based on intraventricular infusion tests. Child's Nerv Syst 10, 337–339 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335174
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335174