Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shunt removal or replacement based on intraventricular infusion tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 14 children with indewelling ventriculoatrial or ventriculoperitoneal shunts, the need for continued shunt treatment was judged to be uncertain based on clinical symptoms and signs and CT scans. Ventricular outflow resistance (R0) was determined by implantation of a ventricular catheter and steady state infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) according to the formula R0 = (Pp-P0)/Infusion rate, where P0 is the opening pressure in the lateral ventricle and Pp the plateau pressure recorded at that particular infusion rate. R0 was determined during general anesthesia and stready state ventilation was ensured by mechanical ventilator. Ventricular fluid pressure (VFP) and arterial blood pressure (ABP) were recorded by standard fluid pressure transducers. The cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP = ABP-VFP) was kept above 30 mmHg by reducing the infusion rate in cases of unacceptable increase in VFP. R0 was determined with the shunt clamped. During steady state infusion at the plateau pressure the shunt was unclamped to test shunt patency. Four children had normal R0 values with the shunt clamped. Their shunts were removed. They have done well clinically, and control CT scans have not demonstrated increased ventricular size. Three children demonstrated pathologic R0 values (above 12 mmHg/ml per min) that normalized after shunt unclamping; i.e. each had a well-functioning shunt. Seven children demonstrated increased R0 values even after shunt unclamping. Their shunts were replaced, and clinical improvement has been observed in 6 of them. Ventricular infusion tests appear useful to evaluate shunt dependence and function in difficult cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Børgesen SE, Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105:65–86

    Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein F (1985) How to keep shunts functioning or “the impossible dream.” Clin Neurosurg 32:608–631

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kosteljanetz M (1985) Resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid determined by bolus injection technique and constant rate steady state infusion in humans. Neurosurgery 16:336–340

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM (1978) A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48:332–344

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nugent GR, Al-Mefty O, Chou S (1979) Communicating hydrocephalus as a cause of aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg 51:812–818

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schutz H, Ter Brugge KG, Chiu MC, Mongul A, Taylor F (1983) Determination of CSF shunt patency with lumbar infusion test. J Neurosurg 58:553–556

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sklar FH, Beyer CW, Ramanathan M, Clark WK (1980) Servo-controlled lumbar infusions in children. A quantitative approach to the problem of arrested hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 52:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  8. Woodford J, Saunders RL, Sachs E (1976) Shunt system patency testing by lumbar infusion. J Neurosurg 45:60–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundar, T. Shunt removal or replacement based on intraventricular infusion tests. Child's Nerv Syst 10, 337–339 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335174

Key words

Navigation