Skip to main content
Log in

Genes which suppress position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster are clustered

  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have isolated more than 50 dominant suppressors and 3 dominant enhancers of position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. To our surprise, genetic mapping studies revealed that the Su(var) mutations are not randomly dispersed throughout the genome of this organism. Rather they fall into very discrete clusters. Moreover, all of the induced Su(var) mutations which map to a major second chromosome cluster are recessive lethal, whereas all of those which map within any of several third chromosome clusters are viable. Complementation analysis involving Su(var) mutations located within the 2L cluster suggests that several different loci occupy this site. Thus, these clusters may represent groupings of functionally related but distinct Su(var) loci.

A subset of the suppressors were examined for their effects on several different variegating rearrangements. The results suggest that the suppressing ability of the mutants is general. Interestingly, the effects of the suppressors in males appears to be highly dependent upon the presence of the Y chromosome. Finally, examination of the Su(var) mutants at different developmental temperatures indicated that at least one of them is temperature-sensitive. These findings are discussed with respect to the potential for genetic and functional dissection of loci which encolde chromosomal components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appels R, Hilliker AJ (1982) The cytogenetic boundaries of the rDNA region within heterochromation of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster and their relation to male meiotic pairing sites. Genet Res 39:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker WK (1968) Position-effect variegation. Adv Genet 14:133–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerec M, Slizynska H (1937) Mottled white 258-18 of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 22:641–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinin NO, Sidorov BN (1935) The position effect of the hairy gene. Biol Zh Mosk 4:555–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowen JW, Gay EH (1933) Effect of temperature on eversporting eye colour in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 77:312

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowen JW, Gay EH (1934) Chromosome constitution and behavior in ever-sporting and mottling in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 19:189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Goldstein IJ (1967) On the relationship between heterochromatization and variegation in Drosophila, with special reference to temperature-sensitive periods. Genet Res 10:143–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Henikoff S (1979a) Does position-effect variegation in Drosophila result from somatic gene loss? In: Axel R, Maniatis T., Fox CF (eds) Eukaryotic gene regulation. Academic Press, New York, pp 123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Henikoff S (1979b) Position-effects and variegation enhancers in an autosomal region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 93:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Henikoff S (1981) Position-effect variegation and chromosome structure of a heat shock puff in Drosophila. Chromosoma 83:381–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh T, Brutlag D (1979) A protein that preferentially binds Drosophila satellite DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:726–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd BH (1955) Direct proof of a variegated-type position-effect at the white locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 40:739–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger L, Varshavsky A (1982a) Selective arrangement of ubiquitinated and D1 protein-containing nucleosomes within the Drosophila genome. Cell 28:375–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger L, Varshavsky A (1982b) Protein D1 preferentially binds A+T-rich DNA in vitro and is a component of Drosophila melanogaster nucleosomes containing A+T-rich satellite DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:7152–7156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis EB (1950) The phenomenon of position effect. Adv Genet 3:73–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis EB, Bacher F (1968) Method of feeding ehtyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to Drosophila males. Drosophila Inf Serv 43:193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ No 627

  • Moore GD, Procunier JD, Cross DP, Grigliatti TA (1979) Histone gene deficiencies and position-effect variegation in Drosophila. Nature 282:312–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GD, Sinclair DA, Grigliatti TA (1983) Histone gene multiplicity and position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, in press

  • Mottus R, Reeves R, Grigliatti TA (1980) Butyrate suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 178:465–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottus RC, Moore GD, Sinclair DAR, Grigliatti TA (1982) A genetic and biochemical analysis of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Can J Genet Cytol 24:633–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Nix CE (1973) Suppression of transcription of the ribosomal RNA cistrons of Drosophila melanogaster. in a structurally rearranged chromosome. Biochem Genet 10:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Panshin IB (1935) New evidence for the position-effect hypothesis. CR (Dokl) Acad Sci URSS 9(4):85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokofyeva-Belgovskaya AA (1947) Heterochromatization as a change of chromosome cycle. J Genet 48:80–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter G, Werner W, Hoffman HJ (1982) Mutants affecting position-effect heterochromatinization in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 85:539–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter G, Wolff I (1981) Isolation of dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 182:516–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Alfageme C, Rudkin GT, Cohen LH (1980) Isolation, properties and cellular distribution of D1, a chromosomal protein of Drosophila. Chromosoma 78:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J (1950) Interrelations of factors affecting heterochromatin-induced variegation in Drosophila. Genetics 35:134

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J (1956) The relation of heterochromatic chromosome regions to the nucleic acids of the cell. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 21:307–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair DA, Moore GD, Grigliatti TA (1980) Isolation and preliminary characterization of putative histone gene deficiencies in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 94:596

    Google Scholar 

  • Spofford JB (1967) Single locus modification of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. I. White variegation. Genetics 57:751–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Spofford JB (1969) Single-locus modification of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Region 3C loci. Genetics 62:555–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Spofford JB (1976) Position effect variegation in Drosophila. In: Ashburner M, Novitski E (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 1C. Academic Press, New York, pp 955–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall PJ (1981) Induced recombination in the proximal region of chromosome 2 in females of Drosophila melanogaster. MSc Thesis, University of British Columbia

  • Zuckerkandl E (1974) Recherches sur les propriétés et l'activité biologique de la chromatine. Biochimie 56:937–954

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M.M. Green

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinclair, D.A.R., Mottus, R.C. & Grigliatti, T.A. Genes which suppress position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster are clustered. Mol Gen Genet 191, 326–333 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334834

Keywords

Navigation