Summary
Rapidly-dividing, well-dispersed cell cultures were established from a Zea mays seedling homozygous for Adh1-0. The seedling was among the progeny of selfed first backcross (BC1) plants produced during a programme to transfer Adh1-0 into the Black Mexican Sweet background by backcrossing. Electrophoretic analysis showed the complete absence in the cultured cells of the major ADH activities (Set I and Set II bands) and the presence of a faint band due to the second ADH gene, Adh2. The extractable ADH activity of mutant cells was typically 7–8% of control wildtype cells. Adh1-0 cells were shown to be more sensitive to anaerobic conditions than wildtype cells, the exposure time giving 50% kill being 14 h for mutant and 52 h for wildtype cells. Adh1-0 cells were also more sensitive to the respiratory inhibitor, antimycin A, than wildtype cells but less sensitive to allyl alcohol. Thus conditions were established to select for or against Adh1-0 cells in culture. ADH+ cells introduced into Adh1-0 cell cultures could be rescued by plating in presence of antimycin A.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chourey PS, Zurawski DB (1981) Callus formation from protoplasts of a maize cell culture. Theor Appl Genet 59:341–344
Dhaliwal HS, King PJ (1979) Biochemical selection of immature, haploid embryos of Zea mays L. Theor Appl Genet 55:257–262
Davis BJ (1964) Disc electrophoresis-II. Method, and application to human serum proteins. Ann NY Acad Sci 121:404–427
Efron Y, Schwartz D (1968) In vivo inactivation of maize alcohol dehydrogenase by a two factor system. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 61:586–591
Freeling M (1976) Intragenic recombination in maize: Pollen analysis methods and the effect of parental Adh1 + isoalleles. Genetics 83:707–717
Freeling M, Cheng DSK (1978) Radiation-induced alcohol dehydrogenase mutants in maize following allyl alcohol selection of pollen. Genet Res 31:107–129
Freeling M, Schwartz D (1973) Genetic relationships between the multiple alcohol dehydrogenase of maize. Biochem Genet 8:27–36
Gerlach WL, Pryor AJ, Dennis ES, Ferl RJ, Sachs MM, Peacock WJ (1982) In: Nagley P, Linnane AW, Peacock WJ, Pateman J (eds) Manipulation and expression of genes in eukaryotes. Academic Press, Sidney
Green CE, Phillips RL (1975) Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci 15:417–421
Hageman RH, Flescher D (1960) The effect of an anaerobic environment on the activity of alcohol dehydrogenase and other enzymes of corn seedlings. Arch Biochem Biophys 87:203–209
Ikuma H, Bonner WD (1967) Properties of higher plant mitochondria. III. Effect of respiratory inhibitors. Plant Physiol 42:1535–1544
King PJ, Shimamoto K (1983) Maize. In: Evans DA, Sharp WR (eds) Handbook of plant cell culture, vol 2. New York: Macmillan Publ Co
Schmidt A (1975) Distribution of APS-sulfotransferase activity among higher plants. Plant Sci Lett 5:407–415
Schwartz D (1966) The genetic control of alcohol dehydrogenase in maize: gene duplication and repression. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 56:1431–1436
Schwartz D (1969) An example of gene fixation resulting from selective advantage in suboptimal conditions. Am Naturalist 103:479–481
Schwartz D (1971) Dimerization mutants of alcohol dehydrogenase of maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 68:145–146
Schwartz D, Endo T (1966) Alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in maize-simple and compound loci. Genetics 53:709–715
Schwartz D, Osterman J (1976) A pollen selection system for alcohol dehydrogenase-negative mutants in plants. Genetics 83:63–65
Sheridan WF (1975) Growth of corn cells in culture. J Cell Biol 67:396a
Shimamoto K, Nelson OE (1981) Isolation and characterization of aminopterin-resistant cell lines in maize. Planta 153:436–442
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by H. Saedler
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shimamoto, K., King, P.J. Adh1-0: A selectable marker in Zea mays cell culture. Mol Gen Genet 191, 271–275 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334825
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334825