Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Renner complexes and duplications in permanent hybrids of Gibasis pulchella (Commelinaceae)

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discovery of permanent hybridity in the very large chromosomes of Gibasis pulchella (Commelinaceae) has allowed specific identification of segmental interchanges in complex heterozygotes. The interchanges are confined to terminal regions, are sometimes very small, and may be unequal in size. Breakpoints have occurred close to major C-bands, probably at euchromatin/heterochromatin boundaries. Complete and disjunctional ring formation at meiosis results in the segregation of two Renner complexes, each of which can be specifically identified with C-banding. The complex carrying the interchanges is usually transmitted through the pollen. Certain chromosomes that have undergone more extensive change than the rest of the complement may have some special significance. There is evidence of small duplications within heterozygous genomes. Permanent hybridity in different organisms may have quite different origins, possibly initiated by major karyotype repatterning following the activation of transposons that generate chromosome breakage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

p :

Short arm

q :

long arm

M :

metacentric

SM :

submetacentric

BS :

bisatellited chromosome in population 4

UB :

unbanded chromosome in population 4

II :

bivalent; ⊙ closed meiotic ring configuration, e.g., ⊙ 10, ring of ten

ch :

open chain configuration

NOR :

nucleolus organising region

References

  • Ar-Rushdi AH (1963) The cytology of achiasmatic meiosis in the female Tigriopus. Chromosoma 13:526–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri PN (1943) Cytological analysis of structural hybridity in Rhoeo discolor Hance. J Genet 44:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr RL, Carr GD (1983) Chromosome races and structural heterozygosity in Calycadenia ciliosa Greene (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 70:744–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside DG (1932) The chromosomes of a new haploid Oenothera. Cytologia 4:68–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside DG (1947) A duplication and deficiency in Oenothera. J Genet 48:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnappa CC, Victor R (1979) Achiasmatic meiosis and complex heterozygosity in female cyclopoid copepods (Copepoda, Crustacea) Chromosoma 71:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland RE (1972) Oenothera: cytogenetics and evolution. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen E, Strachan T, Brown S, Dover D (1983) On the limited independence of chromosome evolution. In:Brandham PE, Bennett MD (eds) Proc Kew Chromosome Conference II. George Allen and Unwin, London, pp 295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington CD (1929) Ring-formation in Oenothera and other genera. J Genet 20:345–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington CD, La Cour LF (1950) Hybridity selection in Campanula. Heredity 4:217–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst H (1940) Zytogenetische Untersuchungen an haploiden Pflanzen von Antirrhinum majus. 1. Die Meiosis. Z Bot 35:161–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham JRS (1987) Patterns of flower pigmentation. Nature 325:390–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell RB, O'Dell M, Hutchinson J (1981) Nucleotide sequence organization in plant chromosomes and evidence for sequence translocation during evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 45:501–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeling M (1984) Plant transposable elements and insertion sequences. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35:277–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerasimova TI, Mizvokhi LJ, Georgier GP (1984) Transposition bursts in genetically unstable Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 309:714–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt P (1980) Uneven diploid chromosome numbers and complex heterozygosity in Homeria (Iridaceae). Syst Bot 5:337–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Hizume M, Sato S, Tanaka A (1980) A highly reproducible method of nucleolus organizing regions staining in plants. Stain Technol 55:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger KE, Ellstrand NC (1984) The evolution and ecology of permanent translocation heterozygotes. Am Nat 124:48–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RC (1985) Genomic differentiation and its effect on gene flow. Syst Bot 10:391–404

    Google Scholar 

  • James SH (1970) Complex hybridity in Isotoma petraea. II. Components of a possible evolutionary mechanism. Heredity 25:53–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K (1978) Aspects of chromosome evolution in plants. Adv Bot Res 6:120–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K, Kenton A (1984) Mechanisms of chromosome change in the evolution of the tribe Tradescantieae (Commelinaceae). In: Sharma A, Sharma AK (eds) Chromosomes in evolution of eukaryotic groups. CRC Press, Florida, pp 143–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K, Papes D, Hunt DR (1975) Contributions to the cytotaxonomy of the Commelinaceae. II. Further observations on Gibasis geniculata and its allies. Bot J Linn Soc 71:145–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp A, Bright SWJ (1985) On the causes and origins of somaclonal variation. Oxford Surv Plant Mol Cell Biol 2:199–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenton A (1981) Chromosome evolution in the Gibasis linearis alliance (Commelinaceae). I. The Robertsonian differentiation of G. venustula and G. speciosa. Chromosoma 84:291–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan A (1942) Studies on the meiotic mechanism of haploid rye. Hereditas 28:177–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis H, Szweykowski J (1964) The genus Gayophytum (Onagraceae). Brittonia 16:343–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis KR, John B (1963) Chromosome marker. J&A Churchill Ltd, London, p 62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YJ, Paddock EF (1973) Ring-position and frequency of adjacent distribution of meiotic chromosomes in Rhoeo spathacea. Am J Bot 60:685–690

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock B (1978) Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Symp Univ Missouri, Columbia 10:25–47

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire PE (1986) Suppression of meiotic ring univalents in hybrids of Triticum aestivum L. by chromosome 7Bp. J Hered 77:222–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Naronha-Wagner M, Mello-Sampayo T (1971) Haploids nulli 5B of Triticum aestivum. Agronomia Lusitania 33:315–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens SJ (1979) The use of empty hard gelatin capsules in controlled pollinations. Euphytica 28:609–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens SJ (1981) Self-incompatibility in the Commelinaceae. Ann Bot London 47:567–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven PH, Gregory DP (1972) Observations of meiotic chromosomes in Gaura (Onagraceae). Brittonia 24:71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert I, Wobus U (1985) In situ hybridization confirms jumping nucleolus organizing regions in Allium. Chromosoma 92:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher T, Ambros P, Schweizer D (1980) Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Plant Syst Evol 134:293–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack SM, Soulliere DL (1984) The relationship between synapsis and chiasma formation in Rhoeo spathacea. Chromosoma 90:72–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilquin JP (1981) An unusual case of a complex heterozygote presenting no taxonomical problem in Chelidonium majus L. (Papaveraceae). Experientia 37:341–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Walbot V, Cullis CA (1985) Rapid genomic change in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 36:367–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Zantovska-Stirton JM, Harborne JB (1980) Two distinctive anthocyanin patterns in the Commelinaceae. Biochem Syst Ecol 8:285–287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kenton, A., Davies, A. & Jones, K. Identification of Renner complexes and duplications in permanent hybrids of Gibasis pulchella (Commelinaceae). Chromosoma 95, 424–434 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333994

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333994

Keywords

Navigation