Skip to main content
Log in

Rate of clearance of intrathecal iopamidol in the dog

  • Experimental Work
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The incidence of post-myelographic sideeffects has been significantly reduced since the advent of the new generation of water-soluble, non-ionic, contrast media (CM). One of these CM, iopamidol, has recently been released for clinical intrathecal use in Australia. Clinical evaluations have shown iopamidol to give excellent diagnostic results. However, many adverse side-effects have been cited in the literature. Reactions to iopamidol following myelography are thought to be due to the lack of a physiologic barrier between the extracellular fluid of the brain parenchyma and the CSF, thereby allowing CM to penetrate the brain parenchyma tissue, following subarachnoid injection. This study investigates the rate of clearance of intrathecal iopamidol from the brain in dogs by performing coronal CT scans at intervals over a 48 h, post-injection period. Analysis of similar regions of interest (ROI) for each time period indicate that iopamidol can be detected in canine brains for at least 48 h following intrathecal injection (P<0.05). Furthermore, the disappearance of iopamidol from the brain parenchyma is approximately logarithmic in form, with a half-life of approximately 22 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felder E, Pitre D, Tirone P (1977) Radiopaque contrast media: XLIV Preclinical studies with a new nonionic contrast agent. II Farmaco (Sci) 32:834–844

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drayer B, Suslavich F, Luther J, Rommel A, Allen S, Dubois P, Heinz R, Bates M (1982) Clinical trial of iopamidol for lumbosacral myelography. AJNR 3:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drayer BP, Warner MA, Sudilovsky A, Luther J, Wilkins R, Allen S, Bates M (1982) Iopamidol vs metrizamide: a double blind study for cervical myelography. Neuroradiology 24: 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trevisan C, Malaguti C, Manfredini M, Tampieri D (1983) Iopamidol vs metrizamide myelography: clinical comparison of side effects. AJNR 4:306–308

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gonsette RE, Brucher JM (1980) Neurotoxicity of novel water-soluble contrast media for intrathecal application. Invest Radiol 15:S254-S259

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carella A, Federico F, Di Cuonzo F, Vissjau E, Lamberti P (1982) Adverse side effects of metrizamide and iopamidolo in myelography. Neuroradiology 22:247–249

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oldendorf WH, Davson H (1967) Brain extracellular space and the sink action of the cerebrospinal fluid. Measurement of rabbit brain extracellular space using sucrose labelled with carbon 14. Arch Neurol 17:196–205

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradbury M (1979) The concept of a blood-brain barrier. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sage MR, Wilcox J, Evill CA, Benness GT (1982) Brain parenchyma penetration by intrathecal ionic and nonionic contrast media. AJNR 3:481–483

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sage MR, Wilcox J (1983) Brain parenchyma penetration by intrathecal nonionic iopamidol. AJNR 4:1181–1183

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drayer BP, Rosenbaum AE (1977) Metrizamide brain penetrance. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 355:280–293

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caille JM, Guibert-Tranier F, Howa JM, Billerey J, Calabet A, Piton J (1980) Cerebral penetration following metrizamide myelography. J Neuroradiol 7:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Potts DG, Gomez DG, Shaw DD (1985) Cranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid absorption and the clearance of water-soluble myelographic contrast media: A review. Invest Radiol [Suppl] 20:S51-S54

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammer B, Lackner W (1980) Iopamidol, a new non-ionic hydrosoluble contrast medium for neuroradiology. Neuroradiology 19:119–121

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammer B, Deisenhammer E (1985) Iotrol, a new water-soluble non-ionic dimeric contrast medium for intrathecal use. Neuroradiology 27:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richert S, Sartor K, Holl B (1979) Subclinical organic psychosyndromes on intrathecal injection of metrizamide for lumbar myelography. Neuroradiology 18:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cronqvist SE, Holtas SL, Laike T, Ozolins A (1984) Psychologic tests in the evaluation of psychic changes after myelography with metrizamide. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 25:257–260

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cronqvist SE, Holtas SL, Laike T, Ozolins A (1984) Psychic changes following myelography with metrizamide and iohexol: a comparative investigation with psychologic tests. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 25:369–373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilcox, J., Evill, C.A. & Sage, M.R. Rate of clearance of intrathecal iopamidol in the dog. Neuroradiology 28, 359–361 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333446

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333446

Key words

Navigation