Skip to main content
Log in

Tolerance to herbivory by a stemboring caterpillar in architecturally distinct maizes and wild relatives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a screenhouse experiment in southwest Mexico, we infested two maize cultivars, a land-race and a modern high-yielding variety, and two wild teosintes, Zea diploperennis and Zea mays parviglumis, with newly hatched larvae of the stemborer, Diatraea grandiosella. While subsequent damage levels, when corrected for differences in plant size, were highest in the wild perennial, Zea diploperennis, this taxon showed the lowest absolute and proportional reductions in growth and reproduction, i.e., it was most tolerant to the damage. Higher growth rates were not associated with tolerance. Rather, a greater number of tillers and leaves in the wild taxa allowed for compartmentalization of damage and greater developmental plasticity. These results, when combined with previous findings on effective defense patterns, indicate that tolerance in maizes and wild relatives may be positively associated with defense against stemboring by the same insect. Because the probable mechanisms for defense (tissue fiber) and tolerance (plant architecture) are unrelated, a positive association is contrary to the predictions of some optimal defense theories, which posit a negative relationship between tolerance and defense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bilbrough CJ, Richards JH (1993) Growth of sagebrush and bitterbrush following simulated winter browsing: mechanisms of tolerance. Ecology 74: 481–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants — an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16: 363–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1980) Nutrient allocation and responses to defoliation in tundra plants. Arct Alp Res 12: 556–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS, Rodman JE (1979) Plant resources for chemical defense. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 271–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Chippendale GM, Mahmalji MZ (1987) Seasonal life history adaptions of a neotropical corn borer, Diatraea grandiosella. Insect Sci Appl 8: 501–506

    Google Scholar 

  • CIMMYT (1989) Toward insect resistant maize for the Third World: proceedings of the international symposium on methodologies for developing host plant resistance to maize insects. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defense. Science 230: 895–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughenour MB (1985) Graminoid responses to grazing by large herbivores: adaptations, exaptations, and interacting processes. Ann Mo Bot Gard 72: 852–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1987) Benevolent herbivores? Trends Ecol Evol 2: 167–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1989) Insect herbivores and plant population dynamics. Annu Rev Entomol 34: 531–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo R (1984) Herbivory: a phytocentric overview. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J (eds) Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass, pp 141–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald CM (1968) The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan WG (1975) Maize. In: Evans LT (ed) Crop physiology. Cambridge University Press, UK, Cambridge, UK, pp 23–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT (1993) Crop evolution, adaptation and yield, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) (1992) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics, Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold WG, Caldwell MM (1989) The effects of the spatial pattern of defoliation on regrowth of a tussock grass. 1. Growth responses. Oecologia 80: 289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez A (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural scientists. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1992) A positive distrust in simplicity — lessons from plant defences and from competition among plants and among animals. J Ecol 80: 585–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulmon SL, Mooney HA (1986) Costs of defense and their effects on plant productivity. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 681–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedin PA, Davis FM, Williams WP, Salin ML (1984) Possible factors of leaf-feeding resistance in corn to the southwestern corn borer. J Agric Food Chem 32: 262–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67: 283–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway TE, Haley WE, Loftin UC (1928) The sugar-cane moth borer in the United States. USDA, Wasbington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvik JA, Stevens MA, Rick CM (1982) Survey of the genus Lycopersicon for variability in a-tomatine content. Hort Sci 17: 764–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Bazzaz FA (1980) Effects of defoliation and competition on growth and reproduction in the annual plant Abutilon theophrasti. J Ecol 68: 813–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann WH (1982) Integrating the cropping system for corn insect pest management. In: Metcalf RL, Luckmann WH (eds) Introduction to insect pest management, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 499–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ (1991) Evolution of resistance in plants to herbivores. Evol Trends Plants 5: 23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ (1992) A bite is a bite is a bite? Constraints on response to folivory in Piper arieianum (Piperaceae). Ecology 73: 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall C, Sagar GR (1968) The interdependence of tillers in Lolium multiflorum Lam — a quantitative assessment. J Exp Bot 19: 785–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Nat 134: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio R, Bowers DM, Bazzaz FA (1993) Pattern of leaf damage affects fitness of the annual plant Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Ecology 74: 2066–2071

    Google Scholar 

  • McKey D (1979) The distribution of secondary compounds within plants. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 56–134

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1992) Laboratory-simulated grazing: interactive effects of defoliation and canopy closure on Serengeti grasses. Ecology 73: 170–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijden E van der, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51: 355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA, Gulmon SL (1982) Constraints on leaf structure and function in reference to herbivory. BioScience 32: 198–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Peairs FB (1977) Plant damage and yield response to Diatraea saccharalis (F.) and Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) in selection cycles of two tropical maize populations in Mexico. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca

  • Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 4–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards JH (1994) Physiology of plants recovering from defoliation. Proc XVII Int Grassl Cong 1993, Palmerston North, New Zealand, pp 85–94

  • Rosenthal JP (1993) Effects of life history, domestication, and agronomic selection on plant resistance to insects: maizes and wild relatives. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

  • Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CM (1989) Plant resistance to insects: a fundamental approach. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT (1992) SYSTAT User's guide: statistics. Evanston, Ill

  • Trumble JT, Kolodny-Hirsch DM, Ting IP (1993) Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory. Annu Rev Entomol 39: 93–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandera JL, Richards JH, Mueller RJ (1992) The relationships between relative growth rate, meristematic potential and compensatory growth of semiarid-land shrubs. Oecologia 90: 391–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson MA, Casper BB (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15: 233–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter SC (1989) Arthropod impact on plant gas exchange. In: Bernays EA (ed) Plant-insect interactions. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 135–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter SC, Steggall JW (1993) Contrasting the tolerance of wild and domesticated tomatoes to herbivory: agro-ecological implications. Ecol Appl 3: 271–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA (1992) Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 363–391

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenthal, J.P., Welter, S.C. Tolerance to herbivory by a stemboring caterpillar in architecturally distinct maizes and wild relatives. Oecologia 102, 146–155 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333245

Key words

Navigation