, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 219–228 | Cite as

Location of genes coding for 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA within the genome of Mus musculus

  • Susan M. Elsevier
  • F. H. Ruddle


Cytological detection of cistrons coding for 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) within the genome of Mus musculus inbred strain SEC/1ReJ was accomplished using the technique of in situ hybridization. Metaphase chromosome spreads prepared from cultured fetal mouse cells were stained with quinacrine-HCl and photographed. After destaining, they were hybridized to Xenopus laevis tritiated 18S and 28S rRNA, specific activity 7.5 X 106dpm/ μg. Silver grains clustered over specific chromosomes were readily apparent after 4 months of autoradiographic exposure. The identity of the labelled chromosomes was established by comparing the autoradiographs to quinacrine photographs showing characteristic fluorescent banding of the chromosomes in each metaphase spread. The 18S and 28S rRNA was found to hybridize to chromosomes 12, 18, and 16. Statistical analysis of the grain distribution over 26 spreads revealed that the three chromosomes were significantly labelled. Grains over these chromosomes were concentrated in an area immediately distal to the centromere, a region which in chromosomes 12 and 18 in this particular strain is the site of a secondary constriction. The relative size of the secondary constrictions, long and thus prominent on chromosome 12, obvious but shorter on 18, and indistinguishable on chromosome 16, correlated with the average number of grains observed over the centromeric region of these chromosomes, 2.5, 1.0, and 0.78, respectively.


Developmental Biology Relative Size Xenopus Laevis Inbred Strain Mouse Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biomedical Computer Programs (W. J. Dixon, ed.), p. 683–710. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press 1975Google Scholar
  2. Brown, D. D., Littna, E.: RNA synthesis during the development of Xenopus laevis the South African clawed toad. J. molec. Biol. 8, 669–687 (1964)Google Scholar
  3. Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice: Standard karyotype of the mouse, Mus musculus. J. Hered. 63, 69–72 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Dev, V. G., Grewal, M. S., Miller, D. A., Kouri, R. E., Hutton, J. J., Miller, O. J.: The quinacrine fluorescence karyotype of Mus musculus and demonstration of strain differences in secondary constrictions. Cytogenetics 10, 436–451 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Evans, H. J., Buckland, R. A., Pardue, M. L.: Location of the genes coding for 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA in the human genome. Chromosoma (Berl.) 48, 405–426 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. Galderi, M., Monesi, V.: Ribosomal RNA in mouse spermatocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 85, 287–295 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. Gall, J. G., Pardue, M. L.: Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological preparations. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 63, 378–383 (1969)Google Scholar
  8. Gall, J. G., Pardue, M. L.: Nucleic acid hybridization in cytological preparations. In: Methods in enzymology, vol. XXID (L. Grossman and K. Moldave, eds.), p. 470–480. New York: Academic Press 1971Google Scholar
  9. Henderson, A. S., Eicher, E. M., Yu, M. T., Atwood, K. C.: The chromosomal location of ribosomal DNA sites in the mouse. Chromosoma (Berl.) 49, 155–160 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. Hsu, T. C., Pardue, M. L.: Distribution of ribosomal genes in mammalian genomes. J. Cell Biol. 63, 147a (1974)Google Scholar
  11. John, H. A., Birnstiel, M. L., Jones, K. W.: RNA-DNA hybrids at the cytological level. Nature (Lond.) 223, 582–587 (1969)Google Scholar
  12. Kierzenbaum, A. L., Tres, L. L.: Genome structure and transcription sites in mouse spermatocytes and spermatids. J. Cell Biol. 63, 167a (1974)Google Scholar
  13. McClintock, B.: The relation of a particular chromosomal element to the development of the nucleoli in Zea mays. Z. Zellforseh. 21, 294–328 (1934)Google Scholar
  14. Moorhead, P. S., Nowell, P. C., Mellman, W. J., Battips, D. M., Hungerford, D. A.: Chromosome preparations of leucocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp. Cell Res. 20, 613–616 (1960)Google Scholar
  15. Ohno, S.: Sex chromosomes and sex-linked genes. Berlin, New York: Springer 1967Google Scholar
  16. Ohno, S., Kaplan, W. D., Kinosita, R.: Heterochromatic regions and nucleolus organizers in chromosomes of the mouse, Mus musculus. Exp. Cell Res. 13, 358–364 (1957)Google Scholar
  17. Pardue, M. L.: Localization of repeated DNA sequences in Xenopus chromosomes; Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, 475–482 (1973)Google Scholar
  18. Ritossa, F. M., Spiegelman, S.: Localization of DNA complementary to ribosomal RNA in the nucleolus organizer region of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 53, 737–745 (1965)Google Scholar
  19. Sinclair, J. H., Brown, D. D.: Comparative studies of genes for ribosomal RNA in eukaryotes. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 67, 404–409 (1968)Google Scholar
  20. Sinclair, J. H., Brown, D. D.: Retention of common nucleotide sequences in the ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid of eukaryotes and some of their physical characteristics. Biochemistry 10, 2761–2769 (1971)Google Scholar
  21. Snedecor, G. W., Cochran, W. G.: Statistical methods. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press 1967Google Scholar
  22. Solari, A. J.: The evolution of the ultrastructure of the sex chromosomes (sex vesicle) during meiotic prophase in mouse spermatocytes. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 27, 289–305 (1969)Google Scholar
  23. Wallace, H., Birnstiel, M. L.: Ribosomal cistrons and the nucleolar organizer. Biochim. biophys. Acta (Amst.) 114, 296–310 (1966)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan M. Elsevier
    • 1
  • F. H. Ruddle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Kline Biology TowerYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations