Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cytological evidence of defective template in the fragile X chromosome

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cells of fragile X patients, the changed X segment may appear as a poorly staining region or a gap, or as a deletion, involving one or both chromatids. To find out whether the fragile site represents ah incompletely replicated DNA sequence, as has been suggested recently, we analyzed the four chromatids of methotrexate-induced endoreduplicated fragile X chromosomes. Our main observations were: (1) a deleted chromatid was never internal to a poorly staining one; (2) an endoreduplicated X chromosome with a fragile site never included a normal chromatid. These results can be explained by assuming that DNA at the fragile site, when replicated in the presence of methotrexate, may undergo defective replication and give rise to improperly packaged chromatin, appearing as a chromatid with a poorly staining region or a gap in the following metaphase. The same DNA may fail to function as a template in the following S-phase and give rise to a chromatid with a single-stranded segment, appearing as a deleted chromatid in the following metaphase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brookwell R, Turner G (1983) Resolution banding and the locus of Xq fragile site. Hum Genet 63:77

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig-Holmes AP, Shaw MW (1976) Cell cycle analysis in asynchronous cultures using the BrdU-Hoechst technique. Exp Cell Res 99:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossen PE, Morgan WF (1979) Proliferation of PHA-stimulated lymphocytes measured by combined autoradiography and sister chromatid differential staining. Exp Cell Res 118:423–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Fosse AM, Prieur M, Lejeune J (1974) Analyse des echanges de chromatides dans les cellules somatiques humaines. Chromosoma 48:327–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Froster-Iskenius U, Felsch G, Schirren C, Schwinger E (1983) Screening for fra(X)(q) in a population of mentally retarded males. Hum Genet 63:153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover TW, Berger C, Coyle J, Echo B (1984) DNA polymerase alpha inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes. Hum Genet 67:136–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyanes VJ, Schvartzman JB (1981) Insights on diplochromosome structure and behaviour. Chromosoma 83:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzeschik KH, Kim MA, Johannsmann R (1975) Late replicating bands of human chromosomes demonstrated by fluorochrome and Giemsa staining. Humangenetic 29:41–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Peebles PN, Pryor JC (1981) Fragile sites in human chromosomes. I. The effect of methionine on the Xq fragile site. Clin Genet 19:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger HP (1972) Rapid processing of primary embryonic tissues for chromosome banding pattern analysis. Cytogenetics 11:424–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondra PM, Ray M (1978) Analysis of DNA replication patterns of human fibroblast chromosomes. The replication map. Hum Genet 43:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumdieck CL, Howard-Peebles PN (1983) On the nature of folic acid sensitive sites on human chromosomes. An hypothesis. Am J Med Genet 16:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Willard HF, Gerald PS (1976) BrdU-33258 Hoechst analysis of DNA replication in human lymphocytes with supernumerary or structurally abnormal X chromosomes. Chromosoma 57:135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau YF (1983) Studies on mammalian chromosome replication. Exp Cell Res 146:445–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan A, Hauschka TS (1953) Endomitotic reduplication mechanisms in active tumor of the mouse. J Natl Cancer Inst 14:1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Liskay RM, Prescott DM (1978) Genetic analysis of the G1 period: Isolation of mutants (or variants) with a g1 period from a Chinese hamster cell line lacking G1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:2873–2877

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubs HA (1969) A marker X chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 21:231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum RL, Ledbetter DH (1986) Fragile X syndrome: a unique mutation in man. Annu Rev Genet 20:109–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnedl W (1967) Geregelte Anordnung der chromatiduntereinheiten in den diplochromosomen bei der endoreduplikation. Humangenetik 4:140–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR (1979a) Heritable fragile sites on chromosomes. I. Factors affecting expression in lymphocyte culture. Am J Hum Genet 31:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR (1979b) Heritable fragile sites on human chromosomes III. Detection of fra(X)(q27) in males with X linked mental retardation and their female relatives. Hum Genet 53:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR (1983) The fragile X chromosome. Int Rev Cytol 81:107–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR, Baker E (1986) Effects of nucleotides on expression of the folate sensitive fragile sites. Am J Med Genet 23:409–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR, Baker E, Fratini A (1985) Excess thymidine induces folate sensitive fragile sites. Am J Med Genet 22:433–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutou SH, Arai Y (1975) Possible mechanisms of endoreduplication induction. Exp Cell Res 92:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor WH, Hagerman PJ (1983) Biochemistry of the fragile X syndrome. In: Hagerman RJ, McKenzie P (eds) The fragile X syndrome — Diagnosis biochemistry, intervention. McBogg, Spectra Publishing, pp 115–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice R, Schneider EL, Rary JM (1976) The utilization of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation into DNA for the analysis of cellular kinetics. Exp Cell Res 102:232–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S, Perry P (1974) Differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of sister chromatid exchanges without auoradiography. Chromosoma 48:341–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to the memory of Professor Menashe Marcus, teacher, colleague, arid friend

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerem, B., Goitein, R. & Schaap, T. Cytological evidence of defective template in the fragile X chromosome. Chromosoma 97, 6–10 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00331789

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00331789

Keywords

Navigation