Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetochore appearance during meiosis, fertilization and mitosis in mouse oocytes and zygotes

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The events of mammalian fertilization overlap with the completion of meiosis and first mitosis; the pronuclei never fuse, instead the parental genomes first intermix at the mitotic spindle equator at metaphase. Since kinetochores are essential for the attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules, this study explores their appearance and behavior in mouse oocytes, zygotes and embryos undergoing the completion of meiosis, fertilization and mitoses. Kinetochores are traced with immunofluorescence microscopy using autoimmune sera from patients with CREST (CREST = calcinosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia) scleroderma. These sera cross-react with the 17 kDa centromere protein (CENP-A) and the 80 kDa centromere protein (CENP-B) found at the kinetochores in human cell cultures. The unfertilized oocyte is ovulated arrested at second meiotic metaphase and kinetochores are detectable as paired structures aligned at the spindle equator. At meiotic anaphase, the kinetochores separate and remain aligned at the distal sides of the chromosomes until telophase, when their alignment perpendicular to the spindle axis is lost. The female pronucleus and the second polar body nucleus each receive a detectable complement of kinetochores. Mature sperm have neither detectable centrosomes nor detectable kinetochores, and shortly after sperm incorporation kinetochores become detectable in the decondensing male pronucleus. In pronuclei, the kinetochores are initially distributed randomly and later found in apposition with nucleoli. At mitosis, the kinetochores behave in a pattern similar to that observed at meiosis or mitosis in somatic cells: irregular distribution at prophase, alignment at metaphase, separation at anaphase and redistribution at telophase. They are also detectable in later stage embryos. Colcemid treatment disrupts the meiotic spindle and results in the dispersion of the meiotic chromosomes along the oocyte cortex; the chromosomes remain condensed with detectable kinetochores. Fertilization of Colcemid-treated oocytes results in the incorporation of a sperm which is unable to decondense into a male pronucleus. Remarkably kinetochores become detectable at 5 h post-insemination, suggesting that the emergence of the paternal kinetochores is not strictly dependent on male pronuclear decondensation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balczon RD, Brinkley BR (1987) Tubulin interaction with kinetochore proteins: analysis by in vitro assembly and chemical cross-linking. J Cell Biol 105:855–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner S, Pepper D, Berns MW, Tan E, Brinkley BR (1981) Kinetochore structure, duplication and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients. J Cell Biol 91:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley BR, Fistel SH, Marcum JM, Pardue RL (1980) Microtubules in cultured cells: Indirect immunofluorescence staining with antitubulin antibody. Int Rev Cytol 63:58–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley BR, Valdivia MM, Tousson A, Brenner SL (1984) Compound kinetochore in Indian muntjac. Evolution by linear fusion of unit kinetochores. Chromosoma 91:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley BR, Tousson A, Valdivia MM (1985) The kinetochore of mammalian chromosomes: structure and function in normal mitosis and aneuploidy. In: Dellarco VL, Voytek PE, Hollaender A (eds) Aneuploidy. Plenum Press, pp 243–267

  • Brinkley BR, Brenner SL, Hall JM, Tousson A, Balczon RD, Valdivia MM (1986) Arrangements of kinetochores in mouse cells during meiosis and spermiogenesis. Chromosoma 94:309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox JV, Schenk EA, Olmsted JB (1983) Human anticentromere antibodies: Distribution, characterization of antigens and effects on microtubule organization. Cell 35:331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnshaw WC, Rothfield N (1985) Identification of a family of human centromere proteins using autoimmune sera from patients with scleroderma. Chromosoma 91:313–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnshaw WC, Halligan N, Cooke C, Rothfield N (1984) The kinetochore is part of the metaphase scaffold. J Cell Biol 98:352–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnshaw WC, Sullivan KF, Machlin PS, Cooke CA, Kaiser DA, Pollard TD, Rothfield NF, Cleveland DW (1987) Molecular cloning of cDNA for CENP-B, the major human centromere autoantigen. J Cell Biol 104:817–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzler MJ, Kinsella TD (1980) The CREST syndrome: a distinct serologic entity with anticentromere antibodies. Ann J Med 69:520–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorbsky GJ, Sammak PJ, Borisy GG (1987) Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends. J Cell Biol 104:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo FJ, Chen D-Y (1985) Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: involvement of the meiotic apparatus. Dev Biol 107:382–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer SJ, Longo FJ (1987) Sperm nuclear transformations are coupled to stages of meiotic maturation in fertilized hamster eggs. J Cell Biol 105:338a

    Google Scholar 

  • Maro B, Johnson MH, Webb M, Flach G (1986) Mechanism of polar body formation in the mouse oocyte: an interaction between the chromosomes, the cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane. J Embryol Exp Morphol 92:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeilage LJ, Whittingham S, McHugh N, Barnett AJ (1986) A highly conserved 72000 dalton centromeric antigen reactive with autoantibodies from patients with progressive system sclerosis. J Immunol 137:2541–2547

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchison TJ, Kirschner MW (1985a) Properties of the kinetochore in vivo. I. Microtubule nucleations and tubulin binding. J Cell Biol 101:755–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchison TJ, Kirschner MW (1985b) Properties of the kinetochore in vivo. II. Microtubule capture and ATP-dependent translocation. J Cell Biol 101:766–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroi Y, Peebles C, Fritzler MJ, Tan EM (1980) Autoantibody to centromere (kinetochores) in scleroderma sera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1627–1631

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicosia SV, Wolf DP, Inoue M (1977) Cortical granule distribution and cell surface characteristics in mouse eggs. Dev Biol 57:56–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer DK, Margolis RL (1985) Kinetochore components recognized by human autoantibodies are present on mononucleosomes. Mol Cell Biol 5:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer DK, O'Day K, Wener MH, Andrews BS, Margolis RL (1987) A 17-kDa centromere protein (CENP-A) copurifies with nucleosome core particles and with histones. J Cell Biol 104:805–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper DA, Brinkley BR (1980) Tubulin nucleation and assembly in mitotic cells — evidence for nucleic acids in kinetochores and centrosomes. Cell Motil 1:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieder CL (1982) The formation, structure and composition of the mammalian kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol 79:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ris H, Witt PL (1981) Structure of the mammalian kinetochore. Chromosoma 82:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten G, Maul GG, Schatten H, Chaly N, Simerly C, Balczon R, Brown DL (1985a) Nuclear lamins and peripheral nuclear antigens during fertilization and embryogenesis in mice and sea urchins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4727–4731

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H (1985b) Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4152–4156

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten G, Schatten H, Spector I, Cline C, Paweletz N, Simerly C, Petzelt C (1986a) Latrunculin inhibits the microfilament-mediated processes during fertilization, cleavage and early development in sea urchins and mice. Exp Cell Res 166:191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten H, Cheney R, Balczon R, Willard M, Cline C, Simerly C, Schatten G (1986b) Localization of fodrin during fertilization and early development of sea urchins and mice. Dev Biol 118:457–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten H, Schatten G, Mazia D, Balczon R, Simerly C (1986c) Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatten G, Maul GG, Simerly C, Schatten H (1988) Microtubule assembly is required for the formation of the pronuclei, acquisition of nuclear lamins and initiation of DNA synthesis during mouse, but not sea urchin, fertilization.

  • Valdivia MM, Brinkley BR (1985) Fractionation and initial characterization of the kinetochore from mammalian metaphase chromosomes. J Cell Biol 101:1124–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandré DD, Davis TM, Rao PN, Borisy GG (1984) Phosphoproteins are components of mitotic microtubule organizing centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:4439–4443

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziomek C, Pratt HPM, Johnson MH (1982) The origins of cell diversity in the early mouse embryo. Br Soc Cell Biol Symp 5:149–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schatten, G., Simerly, C., Palmer, D.K. et al. Kinetochore appearance during meiosis, fertilization and mitosis in mouse oocytes and zygotes. Chromosoma 96, 341–352 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330700

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330700

Keywords

Navigation