Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of simulated herbivory (early or late defoliation and cutting of the flowering shoot) on the growth and reproduction of three species of monocarpic composite forbs (Crepis pulchra, Picris hieracioides and C. foetida) with different inflorescence architectures were studied in experimental plots. For the three species studied, early defoliation had no significant effect on subsequent growth. In contrast, late defoliation, occurring at the start of the season of drought, had a negative effect on growth and reproduction in the two Crepis species, particularly C. foetida, but had less effect on P. hieracioides. Sexual biomass was more clearly affected by late defoliation than was vegetative biomass, although the effects differed markedly among species possibly as a result of differences in phenology. Clipping the flowering shoot removed about 3 times less biomass than late defoliation and had little effect on vegetative biomass. It had much greater effects on the sexual biomass in P. hieracioides and C. pulchra, and resulted in the production of many shoots sprouting from the rosette, allowing the treated plants to regain a vegetative biomass close to that of control plants. Clipping did however lead to the production of shorter shoots and a reduction in the number of capitula formed. In C. foetida, much branching occurred even when the main shoot was not cut; the architecture of individual plants was therefore only slightly changed by clipping the apical bud and the sexual biomass of this species was not affected by ablation of the flowering shoot. Overcompensation was found in only two families of C. pulchra for vegetative biomass. No over-compensation was found for sexual biomass, despite an increase in the number of flowering shoots in C. pulchra and P. hieracioides following clipping. However situations close to compensation for the vegetative biomass in the three species and in P. hieracioides for the sexual biomass were recorded. The response of the three study species to simulated herbivory were related to their architecture and to the time of defoliation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alward RD, Joern A (1993) Plasticity and overcompensation in grass responses to herbivory. Oecologia 95:358–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky AJ (1986) Does herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. Am Nat 127:870–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergelson J, Crawley MJ (1992) Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata—the disadvantages of being eaten. Am Nat 139:870–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK, Gange AC (1990) Insect herbivory belowground Adv Ecol Res 20:1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK, Gange AC (1992) Secondary plant succession — how is it modified by insect herbivory. Vegetatio 101:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH (1987) Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience 37:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 1999:1302–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Coste H (1937) Flore descriptive et illustrée de la France, de la Corse et des contrées limitrophes. Librairie des Sciences, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Day RW, Quinn GP (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol Monogr 59:433–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Doak DF (1992) Lifetime impacts of herbivory for a perennial plant. Ecology 73:2086–2099

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer MI, Turner CL, Seastedt TR (1993) Herbivory and its consequences. Ecol Appl 3:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedge KE, Maun MA (1992) Effects of simulated herbivory on growth and reproduction of 2 beach annuals, Cakile edentula and Corispermum hyssopifolium. Can J Bot 70:2467–2475

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix SD (1988) Herbivory and its impact on plant reproduction. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L. (eds) Plant reproductive ecology. Patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 246–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalten J, Danell K, Ericson L (1993) Effects of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of birches. Ecology 74:1136–1142

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntly N (1991) Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:477–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson DA (1963) Response of individual plants to harvesting. Bot Rev 29:532–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers AE, Lechowicz MJ (1989) Effects of leaf removal on reproduction vs. belowground storage in Trillium grandiflorum. Ecology 70:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ (1984) Leaf herbivores decrease fitness of a tropical plant. Science 226:537–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio R, Bowers MD, Bazzaz FA (1993) Pattern of leaf damage affects fitness of the annual plant Raphanus sativus, Brasicaceae. Ecology 74:2066–2071

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1983) Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory. Oikos 40:329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1986) On plants and herbivores. Am Nat 128: 765–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud JP (1991) Biomass allocation in fireweed Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae) in response to simulated defoliation. Bot Gaz 152:208–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeso JR (1993) Does defoliation affect reproductive output in herbaceous perennials and woody plants in different ways? Funct Ecol 7:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige KN (1994) Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: differences in responses, differences in experimental protocol: a reply to Bergelson and Crawley. Am Nat 143:739–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige KN, Whitham TG (1987) Overcompensation in response to mammaliant herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am Nat 129:407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter EL, Belsky AJ (1993) Application of herbivore optimization theory to rangelands of the western United States. Eco Appl 3:2–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter EL, Detling JK (1981) Effects of defoliation on net photosynthesis and regrowth of western wheatgrass. J Range Manage 34:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwood IL (1973) The effect of defoliation on seed production of six costarican tree species. Ecology 54:1363–1369

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1989) SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 Ed, SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentuc JJ (1993) Effects des invertébrées herbivores dans les successions post-culturales méditerranéennes (D.E.A. évolution et écologie) U.S.T.L., Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner ID, Clauss MJ, Hik DS, Jefferies RL (1993) Growth responses of artic graminoids following grazing by captive lesser snow geese. Oecologia 93:487–492

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Escarré.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Escarré, J., Lepart, J. & Sentuc, J.J. Effects of simulated herbivory in three old field Compositae with different inflorescence architectures. Oecologia 105, 501–508 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330013

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330013

Key words

Navigation