Bibliography
Bell, A. E. [1]. Christian Huygens and the Development of Science in the Seventeenth Century, London, 1947.
Bernoulli, Daniel [1]. “Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis,” Commentarii Acad. Scient. Petropolis, Vol. 5 (1730–1731), publ. 1738, 175–192. An abridged version of this which omitted algebraic calculations, etc., was published in German as “Auszug aus dem Versuch einer neuen Lehre von dem Maase der Glückspiele,” Hamburgisches Magazin, Bd. 1, Stück V (1747), 73–90. Another German translation was published by A. Pringsheim, with an introduction by L. Fick, as Versuch einer neuen Theorie der Wertbestimmung von Glucksfällen, Leipzig, 1896. An English translation by L. Sommer, with notes by K. Menger, appeared as “Exposition of a new theory of the measurement of risk,” Econometrica, Vol. 22 (1954), 23–36.
Bernoulli, Jakob [1]. Ars Conjectandi..., Die Werke von Jakob Bernoulli, herausgegeben von der naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel, Bd. 3, Basel, 1975. In addition to Bernoulli's work on probability, this volume contains important reissues, translations, and reprints of other early works on probability theory as well as interesting commentaries.
Bertrand, J. [1]. Calcul des Probabilités, Paris, 1889.
Buffon, G. L. L. [1]. “Essai d'Arithmétique Motale,” Suppléments à l'Histoire Naturelle, T. IV, Paris, 1777, 46–148. Reprinted in Oeuvres Philosophiques de Buffon, Paris, 1954.
Bruns, H. [1]. Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und Kollektivmasslehre, Leipzig und Berlin. 1906.
Condorcet, M. J. [1]. “Mémoire sur le calcul des Probabilités. Premiere Partie. Reflexions sur la regle génerale..., “Histoire de l'Academie Royale des Sciences, 1781, 707–728.
Condorcet, M. J. [2]. Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des decisions .. Paris, 1785. Repr. New York, 1972.
Czuber, Emanuel [1]. “Das Petersburger Problem,” Archiv der Mathematik und Physik Teil 67 (1882), 1–28.
Czuber, Emanuel [2]. “Die Entwicklung der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und ihrer Anwendungen,” Jahresbericht der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, Bd. 7 (1892), Heft 2.
D'Alembert, J. L. [1]. “Reflexions sur le calcul de Probabilités,” Opuscules Mathématiques, T. II, 1–25, 1761.
D'Alembert, J. L. [2]. “Doutes et questions sur le Calcul des Probabilités,” T. V. 223–246.
David, F. N. [1]. Games, Gods and Gambling, London, 1962.
De Morgan, Augustus [1]. An Essay on Probabilities, London, 1838.
De Morgan, Augustus [2]. A Budget of Paradoxes, Vo., 1, 2nd edition, Chicago, 1915.
Dutka, J. [1]. “Spinoza and the Theory of Probability,” Scripta Mathematica, Vol. XIX (1953), 24–33.
Euler, L. [1]. “Vera aestimatio sortes in ludis,” Opera Omnia, Ser. 1, Vol. 7, 458–465.
Feller, W. [1]. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1, Third edition, New York, 1968.
Fellner, William [1]. Probability and Profit, Homewood, III., 1966.
Fontaine, A. [1]. “Solution d'un Probleme sur les Jeux de Hasard,” Mémoires donnés à l'Acad. Roy. des Sciences, 1764, 429–431.
Fréchet, M. [1]. “Buffon comme philosophes des mathematiques,” Oeuvres Philosophiques de Buffon, Paris, 1954.
Freudenthal, Hans [1]. “Huygens' Foundations of Probability,” Historia Mathematica, Vol. 7 (1980), 113–117.
Fries, J. F. [1]. Versuch einer Kritik der Prinzipien der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Braunschweig, 1842.
Gauss, C. F. [1]. Werke, Bd. 8, Leipzig, 1900.
Hacking, Ian [1]. The Emergence of Probability, London, 1975.
Huygens, Christiaan [1]. “Van Rekeningh in Seplen van Geluck,” Oeuvres Completes, T. XIV, 1920.
Jorland, G. [1]. “The Saint Petersburg Paradox 1713–1937,” The Probabilistic Revolution, ed. by L. Kruger et al., Cambridge, Mass., 1987, 157–190.
Keynes, J. M. [1]. A Treatise on Probabilistic, London, 1921.
Kolmogoroff, A. N. [1]. “Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung,” Ergebnisse der Mathematik, Vol. 2 (1933).
Laplace, P. S. [1]. Théorie Analytique des Probabilités, Troisième Éd., Paris, 1820.
Lupton, Sydney [1]. “The St. Petersburg Problem,” Nature Vol. 41 (1889–1890). 168–169.
Martin-Löf, A. [1]. “A limit theorem which clarifies the Petersburg Paradox.” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 22 (1985), 635–643.
Menger, K. [1]. “The Role of Uncertainty in Economics”, Essays in Mathematical Economics in honor of Oskar Morgenstern, Ch. 16. Ed. by M. Shubik, Princeton, 1967. Trans. from Zeitschrift fűr Nationaloekonomie Bd. V (1934), 449–485.
Montmort, P. R. de [1]. Essay d'analyse sur le jeux de hazard, 2nd ed., Paris, 1713, repr. New York, 1980.
Ore, Oystein [1]. “Pascal and the Invention of Probability Theory,” The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 67 (1960), 409–419.
Poisson, S. D. [1]. Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements..., Paris, 1837.
Samuelson, Paul [1]. “St. Petersburg Paradoxes: Defanged, Dissected, and Historically Described,” The Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XV (1977), 24–55.
Savage, L. J. [1]. The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd ed., New York, 1972.
Shapley, L. S. [1]. “The Petersburg Paradox — A con game?”, Rand Report, P4940, Dec. 1972, Santa Monica, Cal.
Sheynin, O. B. [1]. “Early History of the Theory of Probability,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, Vol. 17 (1977), 201–259.
Spiess, O. [1]. “K9. Zur Vorgeschichte des Petersburger Problems,” Die Werke von Jakob Bernoulli, Bd. 3, 557–567, Basel 1975.
Stigler, George J. [1]. “The Development of Utility Theory,” Essay in the History of Economics, Ch. 5, Chicago, 1965.
Todhunter, Isaac [1]. A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability, London, 1865, repr. New York, 1949.
Von Neumann, J., & O. Morgenstern [1]. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd edition, Princeton, 1947.
van der Waerden, B. L. [1]. “Hl. Historische Einleitung,” Die Werke von Jakob Bernoulli, Bd. 3, 1–18, Basel, 1975.
Wolf, Rudolf [1]. “Astronomische Mittheilungen. LXXIV. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zűrich, Bd. 34 (1889), 131–162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by C. Truesdell
To the memory of Otto Spiess “Quasi cursores, vitae lampada tradunt.”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dutka, J. On the St. Petersburg paradox. Arch. Rational Mech. 39, 13–39 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329984
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329984