Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 105–109 | Cite as

Predator presence may benefit: kestrels protect curlew nests against nest predators

  • Kai Norrdahl
  • Jukka Suhonen
  • Ossi Hemminki
  • Erkki Korpimäki
Original Paper

Abstract

We studied whether the presence of breeding kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) affected nest predation and breeding habitat selection of curlews (Numenius arquata) on an open flat farmland area in western Finland. We searched for nests of curlews from an area of 6 km2 during 1985–1993. For each nest found, we recorded the fate of the nest, and the distance to the nearest kestrel nest and to the nearest perch. We measured the impact of breeding kestrels on nest predation by constructing artificial curlew nests in the vicinity of ten kestrel nests in 1993. Curlew nests were closer to kestrel nests than expected from random distribution, eventhough kestrels fed on average 5.5% of curlew chick production. Predation risk by kestrels was lower than predation risk by corvids and other generalist predators, which predated 9% of curlew nests surviving farming practices and an unknown proportion of chicks. Artificial nest experiment showed that nest predation was lower close to kestrel nests than further away suggesting that the breeding association of curlews and kestrels was a behavioural adaptation against nest predation. Thus, the presence of a predator may sometimes be beneficial to prey, and prey animals have behavioural adaptations to these situations.

Key words

Predation Habitat selection Breeding success Kestrel Curlew 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrén H (1992) Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: a landscape perspective. Ecology 73:794–804Google Scholar
  2. Avery RA (1971) Estimates of food consumption by the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. J Anim Ecol 40:351–366Google Scholar
  3. Baines D (1988) The effects of improvement of upland, marginal grasslands on the breeding success of lapwings Vanellus vanellus and other waders. Ibis 131:497–506Google Scholar
  4. Baines D (1990) The roles of predation, food and agricultural practice in determining the breeding success of the lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) on upland grasslands. J Anim Ecol 59:915–929Google Scholar
  5. Beintema AJ, Müskens GJDM (1987) Nesting success of birds breeding in Dutch agricultural grasslands. J Appl Ecol 24:743–758Google Scholar
  6. Berg Å (1992) Factors affecting nest-site choice and reproductive success of curlews Numenius arquata on farmland. Ibis 134:44–51Google Scholar
  7. Berg Å, Lindberg T, Källebrink KG (1992) Hatching success of lapwings on farmland: differences between habitats and colonies of different sizes. J Anim Ecol 61:469–476Google Scholar
  8. Best LB (1978) Field sparrow reproductive success and nesting ecology. Auk 95:9–22Google Scholar
  9. Cramp S, Simmons KEL (eds) (1983) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the Western Balearctic. Vol 2: Hawks to bustards. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Erikstad KE, Blom R, Myrberget S (1982) Territorial hooded crows as predators on willow ptarmigan nests. J Wildl Manage 46:109–114Google Scholar
  11. Galbraith H (1988) Effects of agriculture on the breeding ecology of lapwings Vanellus vanellus. J Appl Ecol 25:487–503Google Scholar
  12. Geor TA (1978) Effects of nesting sparrowhawks on nesting tits Condor 80:419–422Google Scholar
  13. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol 9 Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  14. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM, Bezzel E (1971) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol 4. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  15. Haartman L von, Hildén O, Linkola P, Suomalainen P, Tenovuo R (1963–1972) Birds of Northern Europe in colors (in Finnish). Otava, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  16. Itämies J, Korpimäki E (1987) Insect food of the kestrel, Falco tinnunculus, during breeding in western Finland. Aquilo Ser Zool 25:21–31Google Scholar
  17. Korpimäki E (1981) On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm s owl (Aegolius funereus) in Southern Ostrobothnia and Soumenselkä, western Finland. Acta Univ Oul A Biol 13:1–84Google Scholar
  18. Korpimäki E (1984a) Population dynamics of birds of prey in relation to fluctuations in small mammal populations in western Finland. Ann Zool Fennici 21:287–293Google Scholar
  19. Korpimäki E (1984b) Food piracy between European kestrel and short-eared Owl. Raptor Res 18:113–115Google Scholar
  20. Korpimäki E (1985a) Diet of the kestrel Falco tinnunculus in the breeding season. Ornis Fenn 62:130–137Google Scholar
  21. Korpimäki E (1985b) Rapid tracking of microtine populations by their avian predators: possible evidence for stabilizing predation. Oikos 45:281–284Google Scholar
  22. Korpimäki E (1986) Diet variation, hunting habitat and reproductive output of the kestrel Falco tinnunculus in the light of the optimal diet theory. Ornis Fenn 63:84–90Google Scholar
  23. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1989) Avian predation on mustelids in Europe. 1. Occurrence and effects on body size variation and life traits. Oikos 55:205–215Google Scholar
  24. Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K (1991) Numerical and functional responses of kestrels, short-eared owls, and long-eared owls to vole densities. Ecology 72:814–826Google Scholar
  25. Korpimäki E, Tolonen P, Valkama J (1994) Functional responses and load-size effect in central place foragers: data from the kestrel and some general comments. Oikos 69:504–510Google Scholar
  26. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640Google Scholar
  27. Lindén H, Wikman M (1983) Goshawk predation on tetraonids: availability of prey and diet of the predator in the breeding season. J Anim Ecol 52:953–968Google Scholar
  28. Loman J, Göransson G (1978) Egg shell dumps and crow Corvus cornix predation on simulated birds nests. Oikos 30:461–466Google Scholar
  29. Masman D, Gordijn M, Daan S, Dijkstra C (1986) Ecological energetics of the kestrel: field estimates of energy intake throughout the year. Ardea 74:24–39Google Scholar
  30. Moller AP (1988) Nest predation and nest site choice in passerine birds in habitat patches of different size: a study of magpies and blackbirds. Oikos 53:215–221Google Scholar
  31. Nilsson SG, Björkman C, Forslund P, Höglund J (1985) Egg predation in forest bird communities on island and mainland. Oecologia 66:511–515Google Scholar
  32. Osborne P, Osborne L (1980) The contribution of nest site characteristics to breeding-success among blackbirds Turdus merula. Ibis 122:512–517Google Scholar
  33. Paine RT, Wootton JT, Boersma PD (1990) Direct and indirect effects of peregrine falcon predation on seabird abundance. Auk 107:1–9Google Scholar
  34. Palokangas P, Alatalo RV, Korpimäki E (1992) Female choice in the kestrel under different availability of mating options. Anim Behav 43:659–665Google Scholar
  35. Siivonen L (1974) Mammals of Northern Europe (in Finnish). Otava, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  36. Sodhi NS, Didiuk A, Oliphant LW (1990) Differences in bird abundance in relation to proximity of merlin nests. Can J Zool 68:852–854Google Scholar
  37. Suhonen J, Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (1994) Avian predation risk modifies breeding bird community on a farmland area. Ecology 75:1626–1634Google Scholar
  38. Walls M, Kortelainen I, Sarvala J (1990) Prey responses to fish predation in freshwater communities. Ann Zool Fenn 27:183–199Google Scholar
  39. Wiklund CG (1982) Fieldfare (Turdus pilaris) breeding success in relation to colony size, nest position and association with merlins (Falco columbarius). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:165–172Google Scholar
  40. Wiklund CG, Village A (1992) Sexual and seasonal variation in territorial behaviour of kestrels, Falco tinnunculus. Anim Behav 43:823–830Google Scholar
  41. Willebrand T, Marcström V (1988) On the danger of using dummy nests to study predation. Auk 105:378–379Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Norrdahl
    • 1
  • Jukka Suhonen
    • 2
  • Ossi Hemminki
    • 3
  • Erkki Korpimäki
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Division of EcologyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  3. 3.PernaaFinland
  4. 4.Laboratory of Ecological Zoology, Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations