, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 29–36 | Cite as

Herbivory and tree mortality across a pinyon pine hybrid zone

  • Kerry M. Christensen
  • Thomas G. Whitham
  • Paul Keim
Original Paper


We examined the abundances of three common insect herbivores on pure and hybrid pinyon pines along a 250-km transect in west-central Arizona, United States. Using six morphological traits, we developed a hybrid index to classify trees as pure Pinus californiarum, hybrid, or pure Pinus edulis. The insects (the stem-boring moth, Dioryctria albovittella, the scale insect, Matsucoccus acalyptus, and several species of pitch moths that produce wounds on the trunk and branches) exhibited different distributional patterns across tree types. Stem-boring moths were significantly more abundant on trees at “hybrid” sites compared to trees at “pure” sites. In addition, within hybrid sites, hybrids supported significantly more moth larvae than pure trees of either species. These two patterns support the hybrid susceptibility hypothesis in which hybrid breakdown results in increased susceptibility to herbivory. In contrast to stem-borers, there were significantly more pitch moth wounds on trees at pure P. californiarum sites than at hybrid and pure P. edulis sites. Within the hybrid zone, pitch moth abundance was equal on pure P. californiarum and hybrids, and both were significantly greater than on pure P. edulis. These within-site comparisons support the dominance hypothesis where hybrid resistance differs from one tree species, but not the other. Scale insects exhibited the most restricted distribution; over the 250 km transect they were found only in the hybrid zone. This supports the hybrid susceptibility and/or the stress hypothesis (i.e., species at the edge of their range suffer greater stress and are more susceptible to herbivory). We summed the mean numbers of these three common herbivores across sites and found that hybrid sites supported 2.1 and 3.9 times more herbivores than pure P. californiarum and P. edulis sites, respectively. Furthermore, tree mortality was on average, 35 times greater within the hybrid zone compared to pure zones of each species and was associated with the cumulative abundance of herbivores (r2=0.646). Regardless of whether this mortality is due to insect infestation, stress or a combination of both, these results suggest that hybrid zones are important arenas of natural selection.

Key words

Dioryctria albovittella Herbivory Hybrid Matsucoccus acalyptus Pinus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilar JM, Boecklen WJ (1992) Patterns of herbivory in the Quercus grisea X Quercus gambelii species complex. Oikos 64:498–504Google Scholar
  2. Barker JF (1990) Sunflower trichome defenses avoided by a sunflower stem weevil, Cylindrocopturus adspersus LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Kansas Ent Soc 63:638–641Google Scholar
  3. Bailey DK (1987) A study of Pinus subsection cembroides I: the single-needled pinyons of the Californias and Great Basin. Notes R Bot Gard Edinb 44:275–310Google Scholar
  4. Boecklen WJ, Spellenberg R (1990) Structure of herbivote communities in two oak (Quercus spp.) hybrid zones. Oecologia 85:92–100Google Scholar
  5. Brussard PF (1984) Geographic patterns and environmental gradients: the central-marginal model in Drosophila revisited. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:25–64Google Scholar
  6. Bunce JA, Chabot BF, Miller LN (1979) Role of annual leaf carbon balance in the distribution of plant species along an elevational gradient. Bot Gaz 140:288–294Google Scholar
  7. Cain R, Cota J, Ward C (1990) Conifer pests in New Mexico. New Mexico State University Cooperative Extension Service, Las CrucesGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobb N, Mitton JB, Whitham TG (1994) Genetic variation associated with chronic water and nutrient stress in pinyon pine. Am J Bot 81:936–940Google Scholar
  9. Cranshaw W, Leatherman D, Kondratieff B (1993) Insects that feed on Colorado trees and shrubs (Bulletin 506A). Colorado State University Cooperative Extension, Ft. CollinsGoogle Scholar
  10. Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics. 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniel WW (1990) Applied nonparametric statistics. 2nd edn. PWS-Kent BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Drake DW (1981a) Reproductive success of two Eucalyptus hybrid populations I. Generalized seed output model and comparison of fruit parameters. Aust J Bot 29:25–35Google Scholar
  13. Drake DW (1981b) Reproductive success of two Eucalyptus hybrid populations II. Comparison of predispersal seed parameters. Aust J Bot 29:37–48Google Scholar
  14. Ericson L, Burdon JJ, Wennstrom A (1993) Interspecific host hybrids and phalacrid beetles implicated in the local survival of smut pathogens. Oikos 68:393–400Google Scholar
  15. Floate K, Whitham TG (1993) The “hybrid-bridge” hypothesis: host shifting via plant hybrid swarms. Am Nat 141:651–662Google Scholar
  16. Floate K, Whitham TG (1994) Aphid-ant interaction reduces chrysomelid herbivory in a cottonwood hybrid zone. Oecologia 97:215–221Google Scholar
  17. Floate K, Whitham TG (1995) Insects as traits in plant systematics: their use in discriminating between hybrid cottonwoods. Can J Bot (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Floate KD, Kearsley MJC, Whitham TG (1993) Elevated herbivory in plant hybrid zones: Chrysomela confluens, Populus and phenological sinks. Ecology 74:2025–2034Google Scholar
  19. Floate KD, Whitham TG, Keim P (1994) Morphological versus genetic markers in classifying hybrid plants. Evolution (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Fritz RS, Nichols-Orians CM, Brunsfeld SJ (1994) Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community. Oecologia 97:106–117Google Scholar
  21. Gallun RL, Khush GS (1980) Genetic factors affecting expression and stability of resistance. In: Maxwell FG, Jennings PR (eds) Breeding plants resistant to insects. Wiley, New York, pp 63–85Google Scholar
  22. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennrich R, Sampson P (1983) Stepwise discriminant analysis. In: Dixon WJ (ed) BMDP statistical software. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 519–537Google Scholar
  24. Keim P, Paige KN, Whitham TG, Lark KG (1989) Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm of Populus: occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123:557–565Google Scholar
  25. Keim P, Beavis W, Schupp J, Freestone R (1992) Evaluation of soybean RFLP marker diversity in adapted germ plasm. Theor Appl Genet 85:205–212Google Scholar
  26. Lanner RM (1974) Natural hybridization between Pinus edulis and Pinus monophylla in the American Southwest. Silv Genet 23:108–116Google Scholar
  27. Lanner RM, Phillips AM (1992) Natural hybridization and introgression of pinyon pines in northwestern Arizona. Int J Plant Sci 153:250–257Google Scholar
  28. Little EL (1968) Two new pinyon varieties from Arizona. Phytologia 17:329–341Google Scholar
  29. Malusa J (1992) Phylogeny and biogeography of the pinyon pines (Pinus subsect. Cembroides). Syst Bot 17:42–66Google Scholar
  30. Manley AM, Fowler DP (1969) Spruce budworm defoliation in relation to introgression in red and black spruce. For Sci 15:365–366Google Scholar
  31. Martinsen GD, Whitham TG (1994) More birds nest in hybrid cottonwoods. Wilson Bulletin 106:474–481Google Scholar
  32. Maxwell FG, Jennings PR (1980) Breeding plants resistant to insects. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. McClure MS (1985) Patterns of abundance, survivorship, and fecundity of Nuculaspis tsugae (Homoptera: Diaspididae) on Tsuga species in Japan in relation to elevation. Environ Entomol 14:413–415Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell RG, Johnson NE, Wright KH (1974) Susceptibility of 10 spruce species and hybrids to the white pine weevil (=sitka spruce weevil) in the pacific northwest USDA For Serv Res Note PNW-225Google Scholar
  35. Mopper S, Mitton JB, Whitham TG, Cobb NS, Christensen KM (1991) Genetic differentiation and heterozygosity in pinyon pine associated with resistance to herbivory and environmental stress. Evolution 45:989–999Google Scholar
  36. Moran NA, Whitham TG (1988) Evolutionary reduction of complex life cycles: loss of host alternation in Pemphigus (Homoptera: Aphididae) Evolution 42:717–728Google Scholar
  37. Moran NA (1991) Phenotype fixation and genotypic diversity in the complex life cycle of the aphid Pemphigus betae. Evolution 45:957–970Google Scholar
  38. Morrow PA, Whitham TG, Potts BM, Ladiges P, Ashton DH, Williams JB (1994) Gall-forming insects concentrate on hybrid phenotypes of Eucalyptus. In: Baranchikov YN, Price PW, Mattson WJ Jr (eds) Gall-forming insects: ecology, physiology and evolution. USDA For Serv North Central For Exp St, GTRNC-174, pp 121–134Google Scholar
  39. Paige KN, Capman WC (1993) The effects of host-plant genotype, hybridization, and environment on gall-aphid attack and survival in cottonwood: the importance of genetic studies and the utility of RFLPs. Evolution 47:36–45Google Scholar
  40. Paige KN, Keim P, Whitham TG, Lark KG (1990) The use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to study the ecology and evolutionary biology of aphid-plant interactions. In: Campbell RK, Eikenbary RD (eds) Aphid-plant genotype interactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 69–87Google Scholar
  41. Parsons PA (1991) Evolutionary rates: stress and species boundaries. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:1–18Google Scholar
  42. Price PW (1991) The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251Google Scholar
  43. Riesberg LH, Wendel JF (1993) Introgression and its consequences in plants. In: Harrison RG (ed) Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 70–109Google Scholar
  44. Stace CA (1987) Hybridization and the plant species. In: Urbanska KM (ed) Differentiation patterns in higher plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 115–127Google Scholar
  45. Tingey WM, Singh SR (1980) Environmental factors influencing the magnitude and expression of resistance. In: Maxwell FG, Jennings PR (eds) Breeding plants resistant to insects. Wiley, New York, pp 87–113Google Scholar
  46. Waring GL, Cobb NS (1992) The impact of plant stress on herbivore population dynamics. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect-plant interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 167–226Google Scholar
  47. White TCR (1969) An index to measure weather-induced stress of trees associated with outbreaks of psyllids in Australia. Ecology 50:905–909Google Scholar
  48. Whitham TG (1989) Plant hybrid zones as sinks for pests. Science 244:1490–1493Google Scholar
  49. Whitham TG, Morrow PA, Potts BM (1991) Conservation of hybrid plants. Science 254:779–780Google Scholar
  50. Whitham TG, Morrow PA, Potts BM (1994) Plant hybrid zones as centers of biodiversity: the herbivore community of two endemic Tasmanian eucalypts. Oecologia 97:481–490Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerry M. Christensen
    • 1
  • Thomas G. Whitham
    • 1
  • Paul Keim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations