Skip to main content
Log in

Dokumente zur Revalidierung von Thomas Harriot als Algebraiker

  • Published:
Archive for History of Exact Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

The mathematician Thomas Harriot has hitherto been evaluated almost exclusively from his Artis analyticœ praxis, which in 1631 was published posthumously from an imperfect manuscript. In this praxis algebraic equations and their solutions are discussed, but negative and complex roots are almost entirely neglected. However, Harriot's manuscripts (Add 6782–9 Br. Mus. and H.M.C. 240 and 241, Petworth House) reveal that Harriot in his own working papers listed negative roots and in many cases also complex roots. Also in other respects Harriot had a better understanding of algebraic equations than appears from the praxis. According to its title page, this work was composed as a textbook for the instruction of the Earl of Northumberland. Harriot may not have thought it advisable to introduce in such a book numbers which were more difficult to visualize than natural numbers, fractions, and positive roots.

The author has discovered manuscript passages (in papers of Torporley, Cavendish, Pell etc.) which indicate that transcripts from Harriot's unpublished works circulated among several mathematicians and amateurs in the seventeenth century.

It is curious that John Wallis, commenting on Harriot's algebraical innovations, gives a description which conforms much better with Harriot's algebraical manuscripts (notably Ms. Add 6783) than with the printed praxis. Since Wallis mostly denied all knowledge of Harriot's manuscripts, documents reflecting on the moral character and trustworthiness of Wallis have been added to the other documentary evidence of this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Harriot, Thomas, Artis analyticæ praxis, London 1631.

  • Wallis, John, A Treatise of Algebra. London 1685.

  • Aubrey, John, „Brief Lives“, chiefly of Contemporaries, set down by John Aubrey, between the Years 1669–1696. Edited by Andrew Clark. Oxford 1898, 2 Bd. Aubrey's Brief Lives, edited by Oliver Lawson Dick, 1949, 1958 and 1962.

  • Montucla, J. E., Histoire des Mathématiques, Paris 1758. Posthume zweite Ausgabe 1799–1802.

  • Rigaud, S. P., Bradley's “Miscellaneous Works and Correspondence”, Supplement I u. II, Oxford 1832–3. Über verschiedene zerstreute Notizen Rigauds über Zach-Harriot, siehe Lohnes “The Fair Fame”. The Correspondence of Scientific Men in the seventeenth Century, 2 Bd. Oxford 1841.

  • Halliwell, J. O., Collection of Letters Illustrative of the Progress of Science, London 1841 (Reprint 1965). Siehe insbesondere den Appendix.

  • Stevens, Henry, Thomas Harriot, The Mathematician, The Philosopher and the Scholar, Developed chiefly from Dormant Materials. Privately Printed. London 1900 (Henry Stevens of Vermont starb 28. 2. 1886).

  • Cajori, Florian, A Revaluation of Harriot's Artis analyticæ praxis, Isis 1928.

  • Lohne, J. A., Thomas Harriott (1560–1621), Centaurus 1959. The Fair Fame of Thomas Harriot, Centaurus 1963. Thomas Harriot als Mathematiker, Centaurus 1965.

  • Scriba, Chr., Wallis und Harriot, Centaurus 1965.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Vorgelegt von J. E. Hofmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lohne, J.A. Dokumente zur Revalidierung von Thomas Harriot als Algebraiker. Arch. Rational Mech. 3, 185–205 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327624

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327624

Navigation