Skip to main content
Log in

Current concepts in the relative efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL) have largely replaced open surgical operations for the management of upper urinary tract calculi. ESWL is generally preferred for calculi less than or equal to 2 cm as morbidity is lower than PCNL and success rates comparable. However, the morbidity of ESWL rises substantially for stones greater than 2 cm, while the stone-free rate is lessened compared to PCNL (41% vs. 82%, p<0.01), suggesting that PCNL is preferred for most larger stones. Results for staghorn calculi comparable to anatrophic nephrolithotomy with lowered morbidity may be achieved with PCNL followed by ESWL. PCNL is also preferred for stone-containing, calyceal diverticula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rupel E, Brown R (1941) Nephroscopy with removal of stone following nephrostomy for obstructive calculus anuria. J Urol 46:177

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W (1955) Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. JAMA 157:891

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fernstrom I, Johannson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:357

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith AD, Reinke DB, Miller RP, et al (1979) Percutaneous nephrostomy in the management of ureteral and renal calculi. Radiology 133:49

    Google Scholar 

  5. White EC, Smith AD (1984) Percutaneous stone extraction from 200 patients. J Urol 132:437

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marberger M, Stackl W, Mruby W (1982) Percutaneous litholapaxy of renal calculi with ultrasound. Eur Urol 8:236

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brannen GE, Bush WH, Correa RH, Gibbons RP, Elder JS (1985) Kidney stone removal: percutaneous vs. surgical lithotomy. J Urol 133:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Mardeman SW, Franklin J, Curry T, Peters P (1985) Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy vs. open surgery of renal calculi. JAMA 254:1054

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP, et al. (1984) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: extraction of renal and ureteral calculi from 100 patients. J Urol 131:868

    Google Scholar 

  10. Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams MJ, Barrett DM, Benson RC, May GR, Bender GE (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol 134:1077

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP, et al. (1983) Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: an approach to branched and staghorn calculi. JAMA 250:73

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elder JS, Gibbons RP, Bush WH (1984) Ultrasonic lithotripsy of a large staghorn calculus. J Urol 131:1152

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karlin G, Smith AD (1987) Endopyelotomy and pyeloplasty — a comparative analysis. J Urol 137:174A

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lingeman JE, Mosbaugh PC, Steele RE, Knapp PM (1987) Urolithiasis in calyceal diverticula: an indication for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Manuscript in preparation. To be presented at the Annual Meeting of the North Central Section. AUA, Detroit, MI, September

  15. Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Brendel W, Forssmann B, Walther V (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127:417

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chaussy C, Schmiedt E (1983) Shock wave treatment for stones in the upper urinary tract. Urol Clinc of N Am 10:743

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chaussy C (1982) Ed. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. New aspects in the treatment of kidney stone disease. Karger

  18. Chaussy C, Schmiedt E (1984) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for kidney stones. An alternative to surgery? Urol Radiol 6:80

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lingeman J, Newman DM, Mertz JHO, Mosbough PG, Steele RE, Kahnoski RJ, Coury TA, Woods JR (1986) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol 135:1134

    Google Scholar 

  20. Finlayson B (1974) Renal lithiasis in review. Urol Clin of N Am 1:181

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fleiss JL (1973) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lingeman JE, Shirrell WL, Newman DM, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Woods JR. Management of upper ureteral calculi w/ESWL. J Urol in press

  23. Kahnoski RJ, Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Steele RE, Mosbaugh PG (1986) Combined percutaneous and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for staghorn calculi: An alternative to anatrophic nephrolithotomy. J Urol 135:679

    Google Scholar 

  24. Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, et al. Long term follow-up results of percutaneous stone removal. J Urol in press

  25. Newman DM, Scott JW (1987) Long-term follow-up of 2617 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 137:45A, April

    Google Scholar 

  26. Libby JM, Meacham RB, Griffith DP (1987) The role of silicon ureteral stents and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of large renal calculi. J Urol (in press)

  27. Mosbaugh PG, Newman DM, Lingeman JE, Mertz JHO, Steele RE (1985) Cost comparisons of the options currently available in the treatment of upper urinary tract stone disease. Report of the American Urologic Association Ad Hoc Committee to study the safety and efficacy of current technology of percutaneous and noninvasive lithotripsy. Baltimore, MD, May 16

  28. Boyce WH (1983) Surgery of renal calculi in perspective. Urol Clin of N Am 10:585

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blandy JP, Singh M (1976) The case for a more aggressive approach to staghorn stones. J Urol 115:505

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rous SN, Turner WR (1977) Retrospective study of 95 patients with staghorn calculus disease. J Urol 118:902

    Google Scholar 

  31. Winfield H. Staghorn renal calculi. Treatment comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135, abstract book, pg. 61A

  32. Griffith DP (1978) Infection induced stones. In: Nephrolithiasis, pathogenesis and treatment. edited by F. L. Coe. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, Chapter 10, p 203

  33. Patterson DE, Segura JW. Percutaneous removal of struvite stone — long-term results. J Urol in press

  34. Chaussy C, Schuller J, Schmiedt E, Brandt M, Jocham D, Liedl B (1984) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of urolithiasis. Urology 23:59

    Google Scholar 

  35. Riehle RA, Fair WR, Vaughan DE (1986) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi. One year's experience at a singel center. JAMA Vol 255, No. 15, April 18

  36. Drach GW, Dretler SP, Fair WR, Finlayson B, Gillenwater JY, Griffith DP, Lingeman JE, Newman DM (1986) Report of the U.S. Cooperative Study of ESWL. J Urol 135:1127

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mulley AG (1986) Shock wave lithotripsy. Assessing a slam-bang technology. Editorial NEJM 314:845

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lingeman JE, Saywell R, Woods JR, Newman DM (1986) Cost analysis of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy relative to other surgical and non-surgical treatment alternatives for urolithiasis. Medical Care Vol 24, No. 12, December

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lingeman, J.E. Current concepts in the relative efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. World J Urol 5, 229–236 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327226

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327226

Keywords

Navigation