Skip to main content
Log in

Transrectal ultrasonometry of the prostate: the prognostic relevance of volume changes under endocrine management

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Since 1980, a total of 55 patients with previously untreated prostatic carcinoma have been managed by castration and were followed regularly by means of transrectal ultrasonometry of the prostate. During the period of the study, distant metastases occurred in 20 patients; 10 showed progression after less than 1 year and 10 after more than 1 year. All patients showed a decrease of prostatic volume following castration. In the group of 10 patients who progressed within 1 year after castration, the initial volume reduction of the prostate was significantly smaller than in the rest of the patients. In patients whose prostatic volume decreased to at least 50% of the pretreatment volume after 3 months, none developed distant progression within 1 year. Of those patients whose prostatic volume did not decrease to at least 70% of the pretreatment volume after 3 months, 78% developed distant progression before or after 1 year. There was no significant difference in the volume decrease observed in patients who showed progression later than 1 year after initiation of treatment as compared to those patients who did not show progression at all. This prognostic information was compared to the impact of other commonly used prognostic factors, such as T-category, N- and M-status and grading. None of these factors reproduced the predictive value of the volume changes of the primary tumor. It therefore seems that transrectal ultrasonometry of the primary tumor has a place in monitoring the effects of endocrine management. The prediction of progression in 78% of the patients with prostatic volume >70% may be of limited clinical value now, but will be of greater importance as soon as effective treatment for hormone-unresponsive prostatic carcinoma becomes available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartsch G, Egender G, Hubscher H, Rohr H (1982) Sonometry of the prostate. J Urol 127:1119

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carpentier PJ, Schröder FH, Blom JHM (1982) Transrectal ultrasonography in the follow-up of prostatic carcinoma patients. J Urol 128:742

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carpentier PJ, Schröder FH (1984) Transrectal ultrasonography in the follow-up of prostatic carcinoma patients: A new prognostic parameter? J Urol 131:903

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schlattman TJM, Carpentier P, Schröder FH (1980) Transrektaler Ultraschall und CT-scan bei der Größenbestimmung des Prostataadenoms und anderer Tumoren des kleinen Beckens. Verhl d Deut Ges f Urol 31:515

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schroeder FH and the European Organization on Research on Treatment of Cancer Urological Group (1984) Treatment response criteria for prostatic cancer. Prostate 5:181

    Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe H, Igari D, Tanahashi Y, Harada K, Saitoh M (1975) Transrectal ultrasonotomography of the prostate. J Urol 114:734

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpentier, P.J., Schroeder, F.H. & Schmitz, P.I.M. Transrectal ultrasonometry of the prostate: the prognostic relevance of volume changes under endocrine management. World J Urol 4, 159–162 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327013

Keywords

Navigation