Abstract
Relative amounts of DNA were determined on telophase nuclei by Feulgen cytophotometry for euploid taxa of birch (Betula) with somatic chromosome numbers of 28, 42, 56, 70, and 84. A direct correlation was found between observed DNA absorbance and chromosome number except for plants of B. papyrifera with 84 somatic chromosomes. The DNA density value for nuclei of the 84-chromosome plants fitted a 1∶2.25 ratio instead of the expected 1∶3.0 ratio. The DNA density value for these plants was calculated to be approximately equivalent to plants which would possess 63 somatic chromosomes. The average DNA value per chromosome was 2.73 for the 84-chromosome plants in contrast to 3.50 per chromosome in each of the lower euploids. Nuclear diameters of the 84-chromosome plants were directly related to chromosome number and not to DNA density value. The genomic number of Betula was considered to be x=7, rather than x=14, since a DNA value equivalent to 63 chromosomes is a multiple of 7 and not 14. Diploid birch species (2n=2x=28), therefore, would actually be tetraploids (2n=4x=28). The reduction in DNA content may be an adaptation for the establishment of higher ploidy in birches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beçak, W., M. L. Beçak, D. Lavalle, and G. Schreiber: Further studies on polyploid amphibians (Ceratophrydidae). II. DNA content and nuclear volume. Chromosoma (Berl.) 23, 14–23 (1967).
Brittain, W. H., and W. F. Grant: Observations on Canadian birch (Betula collections at the Morgan Arboretum. I. B. papyrifera in eastern Canada. Canad. Field-Naturalist 79, 189–197 (1965).
— Observations on Canadian birch (Betula collections at the Morgan Arboretum. IV. B. caerulea-grandis and hybrids. Canad. Field-Naturalist 81, 116–127 (1967a).
— Observations on Canadian birch (Betula collections at the Morgan Arboretum. V. B. papyrifera and B. cordifolia from eastern Canada. Canad. Field-Naturalist 81, 251–262 (1967 b).
Christensen, B.: Cytophotometric studies on the DNA content in diploid and polyploid Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta). Chromosoma (Berl.) 18, 305–315 (1966).
Darlington, C. D.: Chromosome botany. London: Alien & Unwin 1956.
Grant, W. F.: A cytological study of Celosia argentea, C. argentea var. cristata, and their hybrids. Bot. Gaz. 115, 323–336 (1954).
Hughes-Schrader, S.: The DNA content of the nucleus as a tool in the cytotaxonomic study of insects. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Entomol. 1956, vol. 2, p. 935–944 (1958).
—, and F. Schrader: Polyteny as a factor in the chromosome evolution of the Pentatomini (Hemiptera). Chromosoma (Berl.) 8, 135–151 (1956).
Keyl, H. G.: Duplikationen von Untereinheiten der chromosomalen DNS während der Evolution von Chironomus thummi. Chromosoma (Berl.) 17, 139–180 (1965).
— Increase of DNA in chromosomes. In: Chromosomes today (C. D. Darlington and K. R. Lewis, eds.), p. 99–101. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd 1966.
Martin, P. G.: Differences in chromosome size between related plant species. In: Replication and recombination of genetic material. (W. J. Peacock and R. D. Brock, eds.), p. 93–104. Canberra: Australian Acad. Sci. 1968.
Rudkin, G. T.: Photometric measurements of individual metaphase chromosomes. In: The chromosome, structural and functional aspects (C. J. Dawe, ed.), p. 12–20. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co. 1967.
Schrader, F., and S. Hughes-Schrader: Polyploidy and fragmentation in the chromosomal evolution of various species of Thyanta (Hemiptera). Chromosoma (Berl.) 7, 469–496 (1956).
— Chromatid autonomy in Banasa (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Chromsoma (Berl.) 9, 193–215 (1958).
Southern, D. I.: Species relationships in the genus Tulipa. Chromosoma (Berl.) 23, 80–94 (1967).
Wahrman, J., and R. O'Brien: Nuclear content of DNA in chromosomal polymorphism in the genus Ameles (Orthoptera: Mantoidea). J. Morph. 99, 259–270 (1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grant, W.F. Decreased DNA content of birch (Betula) chromosomes at high ploidy as determined by cytophotometry. Chromosoma 26, 326–336 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326526
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326526