Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meat ants (Iridomyrmex purpureus and allies) are perceived to be dominant members of Australian ant communities because of their great abundance, high rates of activity, and extreme aggressiveness. Here we describe the first experimental test of their influence on other ant species, and one of the first experimental studies of the influence of a dominant species on any diverse ant community. The study was conducted at a 0.4 ha savanna woodland site in the seasonal tropics of northern Australia, where the northern meat ant (I. sanguineus) represented 41% of pitfall catches and 73% of all ants at tuna baits, despite a total of 74 species being recorded. Meat ants were fenced out of experimental plots in order to test their influence on the foraging success of other species, as measured by access to tuna baits. The numbers of all other ants and ant species at baits in exclusion plots were approximately double those in controls (controlling for both the fences and for meat ant abundance), and returned rapidly to control levels when fences were removed after 7 weeks. Individual species differend markedly in their response to the fencing treatment, with species of Camponotus and Monomorium showing the strongest responses. Fencing had no effect on pitfall catches of species other than the meat ant, indicating that the effect of meat ants at baits was directly due to interference with foraging workers, and not regulation of general forager abundance. Such interference by meat ants has important implications for the sizes and densities of colonies of other ant species, and ultimately on overall ant community structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen AN (1986a) Diversity, seasonality and community organization of ants at adjacent heath and woodland sites in mesic southeastern Australia. Aust J Zool 34: 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1986b) Patterns of ant community organization in mesic southeastern Australia. Aust J Ecol 11: 87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1988) Immediate and longer-term effects of fire on seed predation by ants in sclerophyllous vegetation of southeastern Australia. Aust J Ecol 13: 285–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1990) The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: a review and a recipe. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 16: 347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1991a) Parallels between ants and plants: implications for community ecology. In Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant-plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford pp 539–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1991b) Sampling communities of ground-foraging ants: pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Aust J Ecol 16:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1991c) Responses of ground-foraging ant communities to three experimental fire regimes in a savanna forest of tropical Australia. Biotropica 23:575–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1991d) The ants of southern Australia: a guide to the Bassian fauna. CSIRO Press, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1992) Regulation of ‘momentary’ diversity by dominant species in exceptionally rich ant communities of the Australian seasonal tropics. Am Nat 140: 401–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN, Blum MS, Jones TM (1991) Venom alkaloids in Monomorium ‘rothsteini’ Forel repel other ants: is this the secret to success by Monomorium in Australian ant communities? Oecologia 88: 157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1984) Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett WA (1990) Scale of investigation and the detection of competition: an example from the house sparrow and house finch introductions in North America. Am Nat 135: 725–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond W, Slingsby P (1984) Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism: the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology 65: 1031–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian MV (1952) The structure of a dense natural ant population. J Anim Ecol 21: 12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian MV (1956) Segregation of species of the ant genus Myrmica. J Anim Ecol 25: 319–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Briese DT, Macauley BJ (1980) Temporal structure of an ant community in semi-arid Australia. Aust J Ecol 5: 121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian KA, Morton SR (1992) Extreme thermophilia in a central Australian ant, Melophorus bagoti. Physiol Zool 65: 885–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ (1983) Assembly of mangrove ant communities: patterns of geographical distribution. J Anim Ecol 52: 339–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 460–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder MJ, Hand DJ (1990) Analysis of repeated measures. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell KL (1968). Rates of competitive exclusion by the Argentine ant in Bermuda. Ecology 49: 551–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC (1974) Species packing in Carribean and north temperate ant communities. Ecology 55: 974–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1985) An experimental study of diffuse competition in harvester ants. Am Nat 125: 500–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellers JH (1987) Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68: 1466–1478

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox MD, Fox BJ (1982). Evidence for interspecific competition influencing ant species diversity in a regenerating heathland. In: Buckley RC (ed) Ant-plant interactions in Australia. Junk Press, The Hague, pp 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox BJ, Fox MD, Archer E (1985) Experimental confirmation of competition between two dominant species of Iridomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Aust J Ecol 10: 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1988) Nest-plugging: interference competition in desert ants (Novomessor cockerelli and Pogonomyrmex barbatus). Oecologia 75: 114–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1991) Variation and change in behavioural ecology. Ecology 72: 1196–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1971) Interspecific competition and frequency changes among ants in Solomon Islands coconut plantations. J Appl Ecol 8: 323–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1973) Sampling ants with pitfall traps: diggingin effects. Insectes Sociaux 20: 343–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1976) The meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a dominant member of ant communities. J Aust Ent Soc 15: 237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1978) Ants. In: Low WA (ed) The physical and biological features of Kunoth Paddock in Central Australia. CSIRO Division of Land Resources Management Technical Paper No. 4, pp 109–113

  • Greenslade PJM (1979) A guide to ants of South Australia. South Australian Museum, Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM, Halliday RB (1982) Distribution and speciation in meat ants, Iridomyrmex purpureus and related species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In: Barker WR, Greenslade PJM (eds) Evolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia. Peacock Publications, Adelaide, pp 249–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM, Halliday RB (1983) Colony dispersion and relationships of meat ants Iridomyrmex purpureus and allies in an arid locality in South Australia. Insectes Sociaux 30: 82–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1973) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins CP, Haskins EF (1988) Final observations on Pheidole megacephala and Iridomyrmex humilis in Bermuda. Psyche 95: 177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, (1976) Recruitment behaviour, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1: 3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1986) Food robbing in ants, a form of interference competition. Oecologia 69: 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt JA (1990) Observations on the relationships between meat ants and termites in tropical Australia. J Trop Ecol 6: 379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54: 187–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugler C (1984) Ecology of the ant Pogonomyrmex mayri: foraging and competition. Biotropica 16: 227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Levings SC (1982) Patterns of nest dispersion in a tropical ground ant community. Ecology 63: 338–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Levings SC, Traniello JFA (1981) Territoriality, nest dispersion, and community structure in ants. Psyche 88:265–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JF, Balinsky EC, Vail SG (1980) Foraging patterns in three sympatric forest ant species, Prenolepis imparis, Paratrechina melanderi and Aphaenogaster rudis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ecol Entomol 5: 353–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1976) The maintenance of the ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. J Appl Ecol 13: 123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1985) Recolonization by ants of rehabilitated mineral sand mines on North Stradbroke Island, Queensland, with particular reference to seed removal. Aust J Ecol 10: 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Moermond TC (1986) A mechanistic approach to the structure of animal communities: Anolis lizards and birds. Am Zool 26: 23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontin AJ (1963) Further considerations of competition and the ecology of the ants Lasius flavus (F.) and L. niger (L.). J Anim Ecol 32: 565–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter SD, Savignano DA (1990) Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecology 71: 2095–2106

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R (1986) Competition and coexistence in an insular ant community-a manipulation experiment (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Zool Fenn 23: 297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (1983) Competition and theory in community ecology. Am Nat 122: 583–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen R (1990) Colony success of the submissive ant Formica fusca within territories of the dominant Formica polyctena. Ecol Entomol 15: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen R (1991) Interference by wood ant influences size selection and retrieval rate of prey by Formica fusca. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K (1988) A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51: 135–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen R, Vepsäläinen K (1989) Niche differentiation of ant species within territories of the wood ant Formica polyctena. Oikos 56: 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck SO (1992) Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 21: 1–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks B, Rosewell J, Edwards K (1984). Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communities. Nature 310: 310–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1983) Competition theory, hypothesis-testing and other community ecological buzzwords. Am Nat 122: 626–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone L, Roberts A (1991) Conditions for a species to gain advantage from the presence of competitors. Ecology 72: 1964–1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1984) Exorcising the ghost of competition past: phytophagous insects. In: Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities-conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 28–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RW, Brown DR (1985) Formicoidea. In: Walton DW (ed) Zoological catalogue of Australia, vol. 2. Hymenoptera: Formicoidea, Vespoidea and Sphecoidea. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra pp 1–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres JA (1984) Niches and coexistence of ant communities in Puerto Rico: repeated patterns. Biotropica 16: 284–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepsäläinen K, Pisarski B (1982) Assembly of island ant communities. Ann Zool Fenn 19: 327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepsäläinen K, Savolainen R (1990) The effect of interference by formicine ants on the foraging of Myrmica. J Anim Ecol 59: 643–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO and Taylor RW (1967) The ants of Polynesia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pac Insects Monogr 14: 1–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH (1984) The role of competition in spider communities: insights from field experiments with a model organism. In: Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities-conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 42–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Wildlife and Ecology, CSIRO Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, PMB 44, Winnellie, NT, 0821, Australia

    A. N. Andersen

  2. Museum of Comparative Zoology Laboratories, Harvard University, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

    A. D. Patel

Authors
  1. A. N. Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. D. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersen, A.N., Patel, A.D. Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species. Oecologia 98, 15–24 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326085

Key words

Search

Navigation