Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

Separation of allelopathy and resource competition by the boreal dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum Hagerup

  • Marie-Charlotte Nilsson
Original Paper

Abstract

An experimental technique was used to separate and evaluate the magnitude of allelopathic interference relative to resource competition by the boreal dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum Hagerup (Empetraceae). To test for resource competition and allelopathy, respectively, Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings were grown in both the greenhouse and in the field over a 3 year period, in four different treatments within E. hermaphroditum vegetation: (1) PVC tubes were used to reduce effects of interspecific below-ground competition; (2) activated carbon was spread on the soil to adsorb toxins leached from E. hermaphroditum litter and green leaves, thus reducing effects of allelopathic interference; (3) E. hermaphroditum vegetation was left untreated to evaluate inhibiting effects when both allelopathy and resource competition were present; (4) PVC tubes, placed in E. hermaphroditum vegetation spread with activated carbon were used to determine growth of seedlings when both allelopathy and resource competition were reduced. Scots pine seedlings grown in untreated vegetation (with both root competition and allelopathy present) had the lowest shoot length and dry weight; seedlings with both allelopathy and root competition reduced (activated carbon in tube) were the largest. Reducing either root competition alone (tube treatment) or allelopathy alone (carbon treatment) produced seedlings of intermediate size, but reduced competition had a greater effect than reduced allelopathy (although, in the greenhouse, significantly so only for root biomass). In the greenhouse experiment, biomass production of seedlings grown free of both interactions (carbon in tube) was greater than the simple sum of the growth response to the individual interactions (tube treatment and carbon treatment, respectively). Larger shoot:root ratios were also found when pine seedlings were grown without tubes (i.e. when resource competition was occurring). In the field, the removal of allelopathy (carbon treatments) increased shoot:root ratio when compared to the removal of resource competition. The study showed that two different interference mechanisms of E. hermaphroditum can be separated and quantified, and that below-ground competition and allelopathy by E. hermaphroditum are both important factors retarding growth of Scots pine.

Key words

Activated carbon Allelopathy Plant-plant interference Resource competition Ericaceae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts R (1989) The effect of increased nutrient availability on leaf turnover and aboveground productivity of two evergreen ericaceous shrubs. Oecologia 78: 115–120Google Scholar
  2. Aerts R, Berendse F (1988) The effect of increased nutrient availability on vegetation dynamics in wet heathlands. Vegetatio 76: 63–69Google Scholar
  3. Bazzaz FA (1990) Plant-plant interactions in successional environments. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 239–263Google Scholar
  4. Bell DT, Koeppe DE (1972) Noncompetitive effects of giant foxtail on the growth of corn. Agron J 64: 321–325Google Scholar
  5. Berendse F, Aerts R (1984) Competition between Erica tetralix L. and Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench as affected by the availability of nutrients. Acta Oecol (Oecol Plant) 5: 3–14Google Scholar
  6. Blum DJW, Suffet IH, Duguet JP (1993) Estimating the activated carbon adsorption of organic chemicals in water. CRC Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 23: 121–136Google Scholar
  7. Campbell BD, Grime JP (1992) An experimental test of plant strategy theory. Ecology 73: 15–29Google Scholar
  8. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11: 233–260Google Scholar
  9. Chapin FS III, Shaver GR (1985) Individualistic growth response of tundra plant species to environmental manipulations in the field. Ecology 66: 564–576Google Scholar
  10. Cheremisinoff PN, Ellerbusch F (1978) Carbon adsorption handbook. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MichGoogle Scholar
  11. Connell JH (1990) Apparent versus “real” competition in plants. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 9–26Google Scholar
  12. Cook SJ, Ratcliff D (1984) A study of the effects of root and shoot competition on the growth of green panic (Panicum maximum var. trichoglume) seedlings in an existing grassland using root exclusion tubes. J Appl Ecol 21: 971–982Google Scholar
  13. Ebeling F (1977) Forest type classification, a base for silviculture in northern Sweden (in Swedish). Skogen 13: 572–575Google Scholar
  14. Eliasson L (1959) Inhibition of the growth of wheat roots in nutrient solutions by substances excuded from the roots. Kungl Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler 25: 285–293Google Scholar
  15. Fridborg G, Eriksson T (1978) The effect of activated charcoal on tissue cultures: adsorption of metabolites inhibiting morphogenesis. Physiol Plant 43: 104–106Google Scholar
  16. Fuerst EP, Putnam AR (1983) Separating the competitive and allelopathic components of interference: theoretical principles. Chem Ecol 9: 937–944Google Scholar
  17. Goldberg DE, Barton AM (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139: 771–801Google Scholar
  18. Grime JP (1977) Evidence of the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111: 1169–1194Google Scholar
  19. Haapasaari H (1988) The oligotrophic heath vegetation of northern Fennoscandia and its zonation. Acta Bot Fenn 135Google Scholar
  20. Hagner M (1984) How is tree seedlings influenced by clear cut microhabitats? (in Swedish). In: Bäckström PO (ed) Skogsföryngring in fjällnära skogar. Rapport ISBN 91-576-2162-4, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, UmeåGoogle Scholar
  21. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Havas P, Kubin E (1983) Structure, growth and organic matter content in the vegetation cover of an old spruce forest in Northern Finland Ann Bot Fenn 20: 115–149Google Scholar
  23. Horsley SB (1993) Mechanisms of interferences between hayscented fern and black cherry. Can J For Res 23:2059–2069Google Scholar
  24. Ingestad T, Kähr M (1985) Nutrition and growth of coniferous seedlings at varied relative nitrogen addition rate. Physiol Plant 65: 109–116Google Scholar
  25. Jacksonmoss CA, Maree JP, Wotton SC (1992) Treatment of bleach plant effluent with the biological granular activated carbon process. Water Sci Technol 26: 427–434Google Scholar
  26. Jobidon R, Thibault J-R (1982) Allelopathic growth inhibition of nodulated and unnodulated Alnus crispa seedlings by Populus balsamifera. Am J Bot 69: 1213–1223Google Scholar
  27. Johansson L (1983) Effects of activated charcoal in anther cultures. Physiol Plant 59: 397–403Google Scholar
  28. Kellner O (1993) Effects on associated flora of sylvicultural nitrogen fertilization repeated at long intervals. J Appl Ecol 30: 563–574Google Scholar
  29. Killham K (1990) Nitrification in coniferous forest soils. Plant and Soil 128: 31–44Google Scholar
  30. Kope HH, Fortin JA (1990) Antifungal activity in culture filtrates of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius. Can J Bot 68: 1254–1257Google Scholar
  31. Legg CJ, Maltby E, Proctor MCF (1992) The ecology of severe moorland fire on the North York Moors: seed distribution and seedling establishment of Calluna vulgaris. J Ecol 80: 737–752Google Scholar
  32. Lodhi MAK, Killingbeck KT (1980) Allelopathic inhibition of nitrification and nitrifying bacteria in a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl.) community. Am J Bot 67: 1423–1429Google Scholar
  33. Lovett JV, Jokinen K (1984) A modified stairstep apparatus for studies of allelopathy and other phytotoxic effects. J Agric Sci Fin 56: 1–7Google Scholar
  34. Mahall BE, Callaway RM (1992) Root communication mechanisms and intracommunity distributions of two mojave desert shrubs. Ecology 73: 2145–2151Google Scholar
  35. Malmström C (1949) Studies of forest types and tree distribution in the province of Västerbotten (in Swedish). Medd Statens skogsforsknings inst 37: 1–231Google Scholar
  36. Mattson JS, Mark Jr HB (1971) Activated carbon. Surface chemistry and adsorption from slution. Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. McGraw JB, Chapin FS III (1989) Competitive ability and adaptation to fertile and infertile soils in two Eriophorum species. Ecology 70: 736–749Google Scholar
  38. Mensuali-Sodi A, Panizza M, Serra G, Tognoni F (1993) Involvement of activated charcoal in the modulation of abiotic and biotic ethylene levels in tissue cultures. Sci Hortic 54: 49–57Google Scholar
  39. Morgan WC, Morgans AS (1992) Potential use of activated carbon as a protectant against pre-emergence herbicides in direct-seeded processing tomatoes. Weed Res 32: 87–94Google Scholar
  40. Mork E (1946) On the dwarf shrub vegetation on forest ground (in Norwegian). Medd Nor skogförsökyesen 33: 269–356Google Scholar
  41. Nilsson M-C, Zackrisson O (1992) Inhibition of Scots pine establishment by Empetrum hermaphroditum. J Chem Ecol 18: 1857–1870Google Scholar
  42. Nilsson M-C, Högberg P, Zackrisson O, Fengyou W (1993) Allelopathic effects of Empetrum hermaphroditum on development and nitrogen uptake by roots and mycorrhizas of Pinus silvestrics. Can J Bot 71: 620–628Google Scholar
  43. Odén PC, Brandtberg PO, Andersson R, Gref R, Zackrisson O, Nilsson M-C (1992) Isolation and characterization of a germination inhibitor from leaves of Empetrum hermaphroditum Hagerup. Scand J For Res 7: 497–502Google Scholar
  44. Qasem JR, Hill TA (1989) On difficulties with allelopathy methodology. Weed Res 29: 345–347Google Scholar
  45. Reichenberger G, Pyke DA (1990) Impact of early root competition on fitness components of four semiarid species. Oecologia 85: 159–166Google Scholar
  46. Rice EL (1984) Allelopathy, 2nd edn. Academic Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  47. Rice EL (1992) Allelopathic effects on nitrogen cycling. In: Ritzvi SJH, Rizvi V (eds) Allelopathy: basic and applied aspects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 31–58Google Scholar
  48. Rice EL, Pancholy SK (1972) Inhibition of nitrification by climax ecosystems. Am J Bot 60: 691–702Google Scholar
  49. Sarvas R (1950) Investigations into the natural regeneration of selectively cut private forests in northern Finland (summary in English). Commun Inst For Fenn 38: 85–95Google Scholar
  50. Shilling DG, Dusky JA, Mossler MA, Bewick TA (1992) Allelopathic potential of celery residues on lettuce. J Am Soc Hort Sci 117: 308–312Google Scholar
  51. Shneour EA (1966) Oxidation of graphitic carbon in certain soils. Science 151: 991–992Google Scholar
  52. Voice TC, Pak D, Zhao XD, Shi J, Hickey RF (1992) Biological activated carbon in fluidized bed reactors for the treatment of groundwater contaminated with volatile aromatic hydrocarbons. Water Res 26: 1389–1401Google Scholar
  53. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1990) Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84: 433–441Google Scholar
  54. Weidenhamer JD, Harnett DC, Romeo JT (1989) Density-dependent phytotoxicity: distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants. J Appl Ecol 26: 613–624Google Scholar
  55. White CS (1986) Volatile and water-soluble inhibitors of nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in a ponderosa pine ecosystem. Biol Fert Soils 2: 97–104Google Scholar
  56. Williamson GB (1990) Allelopathy, Koch's postulates, and the neck riddle. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 143–162Google Scholar
  57. Wilson JB (1988) A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Ann Bot 61: 433–449Google Scholar
  58. Zackrisson O, Nilsson M-C (1992) Allelopathic effects by Empetrum hermaphroditum on seed germination of two boreal tree species. Can J For Res 22: 1310–1319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Charlotte Nilsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Vegetation EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations