Skip to main content
Log in

Mutator versus antimutator activity of a T4 DNA polymerase mutant distinguishes two different frameshifting mechanisms

  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Classical “antimutator” DNA polymerases of bacteriophage T4 were examined for their effects upon frameshift mutation rates at a number of positions within rII cistrons. Their antimutagenic activities reduced frameshift frequencies at a number of sites, but at other sites the opposite occurred: the mutant polymerases exhibited clear mutator activities. This dichotomy reveals the operation of two distinct mechanisms of frameshift mutagenesis that are correlated with the DNA sequences at the frameshift sites. Frameshift mutants subject to the antimutator effects of the mutant polymerase lie in A:T-run DNA sequences, where mutations presumably arise by means of the interstrand DNA misalignments postulated by classical theory. The frameshift mutants produced by the mutator activity of these same polymerases lie in quasipalindromic DNA sequences, where mutations are postulated to arise by aberrant metabolism of DNA secondary structures such as hairpins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen EF, Albrecht I, Drake JW (1970) Properties of bacteriophage T4 mutants defective in DNA polymerases. Genetics 65:187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett L, Brenner S, Crick FHC, Shulman RG, Watts-Tobin RJ (1967) Phase-shift and other mutants in the first part of the rIIB cistron of bacteriophage T4. Phil Trans R Soc London, Ser B 252:487–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzer S (1961) On the topography of the genetic fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 47:403–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutlag D, Kornberg A (1972) Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. XXXVI. A proofreading function for the 3′→5′ exonuclease activity in deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases. J Biol Chem 247:241–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick FHC, Barnett L, Brenner S, Watts-Tobin RJ (1961) General nature of the genetic code for proteins. Nature 192:1227–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JW (1963) Properties of ultraviolet-induced rII mutants of bacteriophage T4. J Mol Biol 6:268–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JW, Allen EF, Forsberg SA, Preparata RM, Greening EO (1969) The genetic control of mutation rates in bacteriophage T4. Nature (Lond) 221:1128–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Farabaugh PJ, Schmeissner U, Hofer M, Miller JH (1978) Genetic studies of the lac repressor. VII. On the molecular nature of spontaneous hotspots in the lacI gene of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 126:847–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillin FD, Nossal NG (1976) Control of mutation frequency by bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. I. The CB120 antimutator DNA polymerase is defective in strand displacement. J Biol Chem 251:5219–5224

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Hearst JE (1980) Pauses at positions of secondary structure during in vitro replication of single-stranded fd bacteriophage DNA by T4 DNA polymerase. Anal Biochem 103:127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikoku AS, Hearst JE (1981) Identification of a structural hairpin in the filamentous chimeric phage M13Goril. J Mol Biol 151:245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo KY, Bessman MJ (1976) An antimutator deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase. I. Purification and properties of the enzyme. J Biol Chem 251:2475–2479

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzycka N, Poland RL, Bessman MJ (1972) Studies on the biochemical basis of spontaneous mutation. I. A comparison of the deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases of mutator, antimutator, and wild type strains of bacteriophage T4. J Biol Chem 247:7116–7122

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada Y, Streisinger G, Owen J, Newton J, Tsugita A, Inouye M (1972) Molecular basis of a mutational hot spot in the lysozyme gene of bacteriophage T4. Nature 236:338–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribnow D, Sigurdson DC, Gold L, Singer BS, Brosius J, Dull TJ, Noller HF (1981) The rII cistrons of bacteriophage T4: DNA sequence around the intercistronic divide and positions of genetic landmarks. J Mol Biol 149:337–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley LS (1982a) Model for the participation of quasipalindromic DNA sequences in frameshift mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:4128–4132

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley LS (1982b) The infidelity of DNA polymerase. In: Lawrence CW, Prakash L, Sherman F (eds) Induced mutagenesis: Molecular mechanisms and their implications for environmental protection. Plenum, New York, pp. 85–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley LS, Shoemaker NB (1983) A major role for DNA polymerase in frameshift mutagenesis. Genetics 103:353–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Streisinger G, Okada Y, Emrich J, Newton J, Tsugita A, Terzaghi E, Inouye M (1966) Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 31:77–84

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Ch. Auerbach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ripley, L.S., Glickman, B.W. & Shoemaker, N.B. Mutator versus antimutator activity of a T4 DNA polymerase mutant distinguishes two different frameshifting mechanisms. Molec Gen Genet 189, 113–117 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326062

Keywords

Navigation