Summary
A true analytical result presumes an analytical procedure without systematic errors. They can be detected by comparing the analytical results with the true value or with an accepted reference. Systematic errors are always superimposed by the random error, therefore such a comparison must include statistical tests. The paper describes suitable test-models for typical analytical problems, as e.g. the validation of an analytical procedure or the (current) control of analytical work. Furthermore, explanations will be given for the interpretation of the test results due to the trueness of analytical data and for the consequences concerning analytical work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DIN ISO 5725 (1990) Part 1, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of measurement methods and results
Doerffel K (1990) Statistik in der Analytischen Chemie, 5th ed. Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig
Youden WJ (1947) Anal Chem 19:946–950
Danzer K (1989) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 335:869–875
Passing H, Bablock W (1983) J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21:709–720
Doerffel K, Hebisch R (1988) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 331:510–512
Geyer R, Doerffel K (1957) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 158:419–421
Doerffel K (1957) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 157:241–248
Hoechst-AG: Statistik und Qualitätskontrolle in der Analytik, S 50
Page ES (1954) Biometrika 41:100–115
Barnard GA (1959) J R Statist Soc B 21:239–271
Doerffel K, Herfurth G, Liebich V, Wendlandt E (1991) Fresenius J Anal Chem 341:519–523
Hauthal J (1973): Thesis for post-graduate study, Merseburg
Marshall RA (1979) Anal Chem 49:2193–2195
Dathe K, Doerffel K, Holzbecher Z, Dolansky V (1979) Sbornik Vys Skoly Chem-techn Prace 14:233–240
Welch BL (1947) Biometrika 34:28–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doerffel, K. Assuring trueness of analytical results. Fresenius J Anal Chem 348, 183–187 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325357
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325357