Oecologia

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 102–105 | Cite as

The correlation between demography and metabolic rate: a test using the beach vole (Microtus breweri) and the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus)

  • Allen Kurta
  • Michael Ferkin
Original Papers

Summary

This study examines the hypothesis that mammalian species with wide fluctuations in population size will have greater metabolic rates than species with smaller population fluctuations. We tested this hypothesis using two microtine rodents — the beach vole (Microtus breweri) and the meadow vole (M. pennsylvanicus). Although these species experience similar climatic regimes, eat similar foods, and have a very close phylogenetic relationship, they show marked differences in demography. Microtus pennsylvanicus is prone to large supraannual fluctuations in population size, while M. breweri is essentially acyclical. Metabolic rate (oxygen consumption) of each species was measured using open-flow respirometry at ambient temperatures ranging from 2 to 34° C. Basal metabolic rate of M. pennsylvanicus (1.81 ml O2 g−1 h−1) was significantly greater than that of M. breweri (1.39 ml O2 g−1 h−1). The lower critical temperature, estimated by continuous two-phase regression, was 28.9° C for M. pennsylvanicus and 29.8° C for M. breweri. Regression lines below thermoneutrality did not differ in slope, but the elevation for M. pennsylvanicus was significantly higher. Thus, M. pennsylvanicus has a higher metabolic rate at all temperatures examined. These results support the hypothesis that metabolic rate is positively correlated with the extent of population fluctuation. We suggest that further evidence for, or against, this hypothesis should be found by comparing closely matched species pairs, rather than resorting to confounded allometric comparisons of ecologically and phylogenetically diverse taxa.

Key words

Energetics Metabolic rate Demography Microtus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramsky Z, Tracy CR (1979) Population biology of a “non-cycling” population of prairie voles and a hypothesis on the role of migration in regulating microtine cycles. Ecology 60:349–362Google Scholar
  2. Beck LR, Anthony RG (1971) Metabolic and behavioral thermo-regulation in the long-tailed vole, Microtus longicaudus. J Mammal 52:404–412Google Scholar
  3. Bradley SR (1976) Temperature regulation and bioenergetics of some microtine rodents. Unpubl PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole FR, Batzli GO (1979) Nutrition and population dynamics of the prairie vole, Microtus ochragaster, in central Illinois. J Anim Ecol 48:455–470Google Scholar
  5. Dertig TL, McClure PA (1989) Intraspecific variation in metabolic rate and its relationship with productivity in the cotton rat, Sigmodon hispidus. J Mammal 70:520–531Google Scholar
  6. Elgar MA, Harvey PH (1987) Basal metabolic rates in mammals: allometry, phylogeny and ecology. Funct Ecol 1:22–36Google Scholar
  7. Hart JS (1971) Rodents. In: Whittow GC (ed) Comparative physiology of thermoregulation. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–149Google Scholar
  8. Hayssen V, Lacy RC (1985) Basal metabolic rates in mammals: taxonomic differences in the allometry of BMR and body mass. Comp Biochem Physiol 81A:741–754Google Scholar
  9. Henneman WW III (1983) Relationship among body mass, metabolic rate and the intrinsic rate of natural increase in mammals. Oecologia 56:104–108Google Scholar
  10. Kleiber M (1961) The fire of life. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL (1978) Applied regression analysis and other mutilvariable methods. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  12. Krohne DT (1982) The demography of low-litter-size populations of Microtus calfornicus. Can J Zool 60:368–374Google Scholar
  13. Kurta A, Fujita M (1988) Design and interpretation of laboratory thermoregulation studies. In: Kunz TH (ed) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats. Smithsonian Institution Press, pp 333–352Google Scholar
  14. Lidicker WZ Jr (1973) Regulation of numbers in an island population of the California vole, a problem in community dynamics. Ecol Monogr 43:271–302Google Scholar
  15. McNab BK (1980a) Food habits, energetics, and the population biology of mammals. Am Nat 116:106–124Google Scholar
  16. McNab BK (1980b) On estimating thermal conductance in endotherms. Physiol Zool 53:145–156Google Scholar
  17. McNab BK (1983) Ecological and behavioral consequences of adaptation to various food resources. Spec Publ Amer Soc Mammalogists 7:664–697Google Scholar
  18. McNab BK (1986) The influence of food habits on the energetics of eutherian mammals. J Zool 208:595–614Google Scholar
  19. McNab BK (1987) The reproduction of marsupial and eutherian mammals in relation to energy expenditure. Symp Zool Soc London 57:29–39Google Scholar
  20. Moyer CA, Adler GH, Tamarin RH (1988) Systematics of New England Microtus, with emphasis on Microtus breweri. J Mammal 69:782–794Google Scholar
  21. Negus NC, Berger PJ (1987) Mammalian reproductive physiology: adaptive responses to changing environments. Current Mammalogy 1:149–173Google Scholar
  22. Nickerson DM, Facey DE, Grossman GD (1989) Estimating physiological thresholds with continuous two-phase regression. Physiol Zool 62:866–887Google Scholar
  23. Packard GC (1968) Oxygen consumption of Microtus montanus in relation to ambient temperature. J Mammal 49:215–220Google Scholar
  24. Packard GC, Boardman TJ (1988) The misuse of ratios, indices, and percentages in ecophysiological research. Physiol Zool 61: 1–9Google Scholar
  25. Reynolds PS, Lavigne DM (1988) Photoperiodic effects on body size and energetics of the collared lemming, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus. Can J Zool 66:835–841Google Scholar
  26. Rothstein BE, Tamarin RH (1977) Feeding behavior of the insular beach vole, Microtus breweri. J Mammal 58:84–85Google Scholar
  27. Tamarin RH (1977a) Reproduction in the island beach vole, Microtus breweri, and the mainland meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, in southeastern Massachusetts. J Mammal 58:536–548Google Scholar
  28. Tamarin RH (1977b) Dispersal in island and mainland voles. Ecology 58:1044–1054Google Scholar
  29. Tamarin RH (1978) Dispersal, population regulation, and K-selection in field mice. Am Nat 112:545–555Google Scholar
  30. Tamarin RH, Kunz TH (1974) Microtus breweri. Mammalian Species 45:1–3Google Scholar
  31. Tamarin RH, Adler GH, Sheridan M, Zwicker K (1987) Similarity of spring population densities of the island beach vole (Microtus breweri), 1972–1986. Can J Zool 65:2039–2041Google Scholar
  32. Trevelyan R, Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1990) Metabolic rates and life histories in birds. Funct Ecol 4:135–141Google Scholar
  33. Wiegert RG (1961) Respiratory energy loss and activity patterns in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus pennsylvanicus. Ecology 42:245–253Google Scholar
  34. Withers PC (1977) Measurement of 105-1, 105-2, and evaporative water loss with a flow-through mask. J Appl Physiol: Resp Environ Exer Physiol 42:120–123Google Scholar
  35. Wunder BA, Dobkin DS, Gettinger RD (1977) Shifts of thermogenesis in the prairie vole (Microtus ochragaster). Oecologia 29:11–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen Kurta
    • 1
  • Michael Ferkin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyEastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations