Skip to main content
Log in

Competition between mobile species using patchy resources: an example from a freshwater, symbiotic assemblage

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three species of freshwater mites that are symbiotic with mussels in St Mark's River, north Florida, have consistently high rates of colonization to and occupy high proportions of mussels. The mites Unionicola poundsi and U. serrata are territorial and have limited numbers/host, whereas the non-territorial U. abnormipes has highly variable numbers/host. U. abnormipes and U. serrata are most common in Villosa villosa and Uniomerus declivis respectively, patterns that can not be explained by host species preferences, whereas U. poundsi is equally abundant in both host species. Field experiments showed that both U. poundsi and U. serrata were limited most by intraspecific competition between adult mites, presumably for access to food and oviposition sites. Additionally, U. serrata did not remain within small hosts, most of which were V. villosa. In contrast, numbers of U. abnormipes were limited by both other mite species although the nature of the interactions differed. U. serrata may prey on U. abnormipes when they co-occur, whereas U. poundsi probably only excludes U. abnormipes from certain areas within hosts. Hence, U. abnormipes occurs mostly in V. villosa because most of these mussels do not contain U. serrata, but even so its numbers are still depressed by U. poundsi. The results were consistent with the general expectation of Holmes and Price (1986) that parasite assemblages where species have high colonization levels should be organized primarily by biotic interactions. However, specific outcomes of competition between mites were consistent with the more general model of Levins (1979) for competition between species using variable resources. Failure of other models to apply to Unionicola pinpointed at least five key biological characters that may form a better basis of comparison than taxonomic or habitat-based contrasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong RA (1976) Fugitive species: experiments with fungi and some theoretical considerations. Ecology 57:953–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson WD, Shorrocks B (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model. J Anim Ecol 50:461–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RA (1977) Nutrition of the mite Unionicola intermedia Koenike and its relationship to the inflammatory response induced in its molluscan host Anodonta anatina L. Parasitology 75:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck Jr WM (1965) The streams of Florida. Bull Florida State Mus Biol Sci 10:91–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush AO, Holmes JC (1986b) Intestinal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: an interactive community. Can J Zool 64:142–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson PL (1986) Environmental variation and the coexistence of species. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology, Harper and Row, New York, pp 240–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF, Simberloff D (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60:1132–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Davids C (1973) The relations between mites of the genus Unionicola and the mussels Anodonta and Unio. Hydrobiologia 41:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Davids C, Holtslag J, Dimock Jr RV (1988) Competitive exclusion, harem behaviour and host specificity of the water mite Unionicola ypsilophora (Hydrachnellae, Acari) inhabiting Anodonta cygnea (Unionidae). Int Revue gesam Hydrobiol 73:651–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Day RW, Quinn GP (1989) Comparison of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol Monogr 59:433–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimock Jr RV (1983) In defense of the harem: intraspecific aggression by male water mites (Acari: Unionicolidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 76:463–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes BJ (1986) Guild structure in water mites (Unionicola spp.) inhabiting freshwater mussels: choice, competitive exclusion and sex. Oecologia 70:457–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes BJ (1988) Coexistence in harlequin habitats: the organization of mite guilds (Unionicola spp.) inhabiting freshwater mussels. PhD Dissertation Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA

  • Downes BJ (1989) Host specificity, host location and dispersal: experimental conclusions from freshwater mites (Unionicola spp.) parasitizing unionid mussels. Parasitology 98:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes BJ (1990) Host-induced morphology in mites: implications for host-parasite coevolution. Syst Zool 39:162–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon MJ, Swan BK, Paterson CG (1979) The biology of Unionicola formosa (Dana and Whelpley): a water mite parasitic in the unionid bivalve, Anodonta cataracta (Say), in a New Brunswick lake. Can J Zool 57:1748–1756

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1987) Colonization of ephemeral habitats. In: Crawley M, Edwards P, Gray AJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, pp 155–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes JC, Price PW (1986) Communities of parasites. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (eds) Community ecology: pattern and process, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, pp 187–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1951) Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1982) Exclusion experiments and the competitive release of insects feeding on collards. Ecology 63:696–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1986) Patchiness, dispersal, and species interactions: consequences for communities of herbivorous insects. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology, Harper and Row, New York, pp 192–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy CR (1975) Ecological animal parasitology. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ (1983) Patterns of recruitment of sessile invertebrates in two subtidal habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 66:213–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough MJ, Downes BJ (1982) Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality. Oecologia 54:348–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (1974) Dispersion and population interactions. Am Nat 108:207–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1979) Coexistence in a variable environment. Am Nat 114:765–783

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography, Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R (1965) Population regulation of a water mite parasitic on unionid mussels. J Parasitol 51:990–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RD (1955) Anatomy, life-history, and evolution of the mites parasitizing fresh-water mussels. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Michigan No. 89

  • Naeem S (1988) Resource heterogeneity fosters coexistence of a mite and a midge in pitcher plants. Ecol Monogr 58:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves RJ, Widlak JC (1987) Habitat ecology of juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a headwater stream in Virginia. Am Malacolog Bull 5:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne BS, Miller AC (1989) Growth and survival of recent recruits to a population of Fusconaia ebena (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Lower Ohio River. Am Midl Nat 121:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, White PS (eds) (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde K (1989) Simple ecological systems, simple solutions to complex problems? Evol Theor 8:305–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks B, Rosewall J (1987) Spatial patchiness and community structure: coexistence and guild size on ephemeral resources. In: Gee JHR, Giller PS (eds) Organization of communities past and present, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, pp 29–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1989) Free-living communities and alimentary tract helminths: hypotheses and pattern analyses. In: Esch GW, Bush AO, Aho JM (eds) Parasite communities: patterns and processes, Chapman and Hall, London, England, pp 289–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1974) Competition and regional coexistence. Ecology 55:128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith IM, Oliver DR (1986) Review of parasitic associations of larval water mites (Acari: Parasitengona: Hydrachnida) with insect hosts. Can Entomol 118:407–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1981) Techniques for analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 19:513–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1986) The analysis of competition by field experiments. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (eds) Community ecology: pattern and process. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Melbourne, Australia, pp 240–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Denley EJ (1984) Paradigms, explanations, and generalizations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In: Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle A (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp 151–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidrine MF (1980) Systematics and coevolution of unionicolid water mites and their unionid mussel hosts in the eastern United States. PhD Dissertation, University Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA

  • Vidrine MF (1983) Verification of oviposition sites of two water-mites in the subgenus Polyatax (Acari: Unionicolidae: Unionicola). Ass Southeast Biol Bull 30:89

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidrine MF (1986) Ten new species in the subgenus Unionicolides (Acari: Unionicolidae: Unionicola) in North and South America, with a re-evaluation of related species. Int J Acarol 12:123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1988) SYSTAT: The systme for statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, Illinois, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodzis P (1986) Competition, mortality, and community structure. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology, Harper and Row, New York, pp 480–491

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Downes, B.J. Competition between mobile species using patchy resources: an example from a freshwater, symbiotic assemblage. Oecologia 85, 472–482 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323758

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323758

Key words

Navigation