Oecologia

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 180–186

Ecophysiological consequences of non-random leaf orientation in the prairie compass plant, Silphium laciniatum

  • Thomas W. Jurik
  • Hanzhong Zhang
  • John M. Pleasants
Original Papers

Summary

The prairie compass plant (Silphium laciniatum L.) has vertical leaves that are characteristically oriented in a north-south plane (i.e., the flat surfaces of the lamina face east and west). We explored the consequences of this orientation by determining basic photosynthetic and water use characteristics in response to environmental factors and by determining total daily photosynthesis and water use of leaves held in different orientations. Average maximum CO2 exchange rate (CER) of leaves near Ames, IA was constant at 22 micromol m−2 s−1 from May through August and then declined. CER did not exhibit a distinct lightsaturation point. CER at photon flux densities near full sunlight was constant from 22 to 35°C leaf temperature but declined at higher temperatures. However, leaf temperatures rarely exceed 35°C during the growing season. There was no change in the pattern of response of CER to temperature over the growing season. We constrained leaves to face east-west (EW,=natural), to face north-south (NS), or to be horizontal (HOR) on eight days in 1986–1988. EW leaves had the highest light interception, leaf temperatures, CER, and transpiration early and late in the day, whereas HOR leaves had the highest values in the middle of the day. Integrations of CER and transpiration over the eight daytime periods showed EW and HOR leaves to have equivalent carbon gain, higher than that of NS leaves. HOR leaves had the highest daily transpiration. Daily water use efficiency (WUE, carbon gained/water lost) was always highest in EW leaves, with the HOR leaves having 16% lower WUE and NS leaves having 33% lower WUE. The natural orientation of compass plant leaves results in equivalent or higher carbon gain and in increased WUE when compared to leaves with other possible orientations; this is likely to have a selective advantage in a prairie environment.

Key words

Compass plant Leaf inclination Leaf azimuth Photosynthesis Water use efficiency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caemmerer S von, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas-exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376–387Google Scholar
  2. Chabot BF, Hicks DJ (1982) The ecology of leaf life spans. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13: 229–259Google Scholar
  3. Comstock JP, Mahall BE (1985) Drought and changes in leaf orientation for two California chaparral shrubs: Ceanothus megacarpus and Ceanothus crassifolius. Oecologia 65: 531–535Google Scholar
  4. Dolk HE (1931) The movements of the leaves of the compass plant Lactuca scariola. Am J Bot 18: 195–204Google Scholar
  5. Ehleringer JR (1988) Changes in leaf characteristics of species along elevational gradients in the Wasatch Front, Utah. Am J Bot 75: 680–689Google Scholar
  6. Ehleringer JR, Forseth I (1980) Solar tracking by plants. Science 210: 1094–1098Google Scholar
  7. Ehleringer JR, Werk KS (1986) Modifications of solar-radiation absorption patterns and implications for carbon gain at the leaf level. In: TJ Givnish (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 57–82Google Scholar
  8. Forseth I, Teramura AH (1986) Kudzu leaf energy budget and calculated transpiration: the influence of leaflet orientation. Ecology 67: 564–571Google Scholar
  9. Jurik TW (1986) Seasonal patterns of leaf photosynthetic capacity in successional northern hardwood tree species. Am J Bot 73: 131–138Google Scholar
  10. Jurik TW, Chabot JF, Chabot BF (1979) Ontogeny of photosynthetic performance in Fragaria virginiana under changing light regimes. Plant Physiol 63: 542–547Google Scholar
  11. Jurik TW, Weber JA, Gates DM (1984) Short-term effects of CO2 on gas exchange of leaves of bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata) in the field. Plant Physiol 75: 1022–1026Google Scholar
  12. Long SP, Hallgren J-E (1985) Measurement of CO2 assimilation by plants in the field and the laboratory. In: Coombs J, Hall DO, Long SP, Scurlock JMO (eds) Techniques in bioproductivity and photosynthesis. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 62–94Google Scholar
  13. Moran R, Porath D (1980) Chlorophyll determination in intact tissues using N,N-dimethylformamide. Plant Physiol 65: 478–479Google Scholar
  14. Nobel PS (1986) Form and orientation in relation to PAR interception by cacti and agaves. In: TJ Givnish (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 83–103Google Scholar
  15. Prichard JM, Forseth IN (1988) Rapid leaf movement, microclimate, and water relations of two temperate legumes in three contrasting habitats. Am J Bot 75: 1201–1211Google Scholar
  16. Schanderl H (1937) Der derzeitige Stand des Kompasspflanzenproblems. Biokl B 4: 49–54Google Scholar
  17. Stahl E (1881) Über sogenannte Kompasspflanzen. Jena Z Naturwiss 15: 381–389Google Scholar
  18. Werk KS, Ehleringer J (1984) Non-random leaf orientation in Lactuca serriola L. Plant Cell Environ 7: 81–87Google Scholar
  19. Werk KS, Ehleringer J (1985) Photosynthetic characteristics of Lactuca serriola L. Plant Cell Environ 8: 345–350Google Scholar
  20. Werk KS, Ehleringer J (1986a) Field water relations of a compass plant, Lactuca serriola L. Plant Cell Environ 9: 681–683Google Scholar
  21. Werk KS, Ehleringer J (1986b) Effect of non-random leaf orientation on reproduction in Lactuca serriola L. Evolution 40: 1334–1337Google Scholar
  22. Whitney WF (1871) The polarity of the compass plant. Am Nat 5: 1–4Google Scholar
  23. Zhang H (1988) The development and ecophysiological consequences of the leaf orientation of compass plant, Silphium laciniatum. MS thesis, Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas W. Jurik
    • 1
  • Hanzhong Zhang
    • 1
  • John M. Pleasants
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations