Skip to main content
Log in

Packaging of offspring by nests of the ant, Leptothorax longispinosus: parent-offspring conflict and queen-worker conflict

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models of the packaging of offspring predict that parental fitness is maximized by following a set of rules, including the rule to invest the minimal amount in each offspring. Offspring can maximize their fitness by demanding more resources than the parent is selected to give, leading to parent-offspring conflict over packaging. Social insect nests may also experience queen-worker conflict over packaging. Experiments were conducted, using two populations of the ant Leptothorax longispinosus, in order to determine the role of both parent-offspring conflict and queen-worker conflict in packaging. Parent-offspring conflict over packaging was detected towards males and workers, but not to females. This may be because both parental and offspring fitness are maximized by investing as much in possible in females so both parties benefit by cooperating over packaging of females. Queen-worker conflict over packaging was detected for females, males, and workers. The direction taken by the queen-worker conflict is best explained by asymmetries in genetic relatedness among nestmates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD, Sherman PW (1977) Local mate competition and parental investment in social insects. Science 196:494–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway T, Buschinger A, Talbot M, Stuart R, Thomas C (1982) Polygyny and polydomy in three North American species of the ant genus Leptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 89:249–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus VL (1992) Allocation patterns in the temperate forest ant, Leptothorax longispinosus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ph. D. dissertation, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus VL, Herbers JM (1992) Sexual allocation ratios in forest ants: food limitation does not explain observed patterns. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:425–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Entomol 53:229–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (1989) Sex-investment ratios in ants: has female bias been systematically over-estimated? Am Nat 133:517–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Isaaks JA (1985) Energy investment and respiration in queens and males of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1989) Comparative analysis of sex-investment ratios in slave making ants. Evolution 43:913–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell TK (1981) Group selection is implicated in the evolution of females-biased sex ratios. Nature 290:401–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (1987) Variable sex ratio among colonies of ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig D, Westoby M (1988) Inclusive fitness, seed resources and maternal care. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press. Oxford, pp 60–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk LA (1987) Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Essentials and advances, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers JM (1984) Queen-worker conflict and eusocial evolution in a polygynous ant species. Evolution 38:631–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers JM (1990) Reproductive investment and allocation ratios for the ant Leptothorax longispinosus. Am Nat 136:178–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers JM, Cunningham MC (1983) Social organization in Leptothorax longispinosus Mayr. Anim Behav 31:759–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Höllodbler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1988) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1948) Natural selection and family size in the starling. Evolution 2:95–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D (1954) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CC (1975) Path analysis-a primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1987) Selection of offspring size at independence and other size-versus number strategies. Am Nat 129:800–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1988) A general principle for the allocation of limited resources. Evol Ecol 2:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1989) The reproductive ecology of plants and eusocial animals. In: Grubb PJ, Whittaker JB (eds) Toward a more exact ecology: 30th symposium of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell Scientific Publications., London, pp 185–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau TA, Dingle H (1991) Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu Rev Entomol 36:511–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller UG (1991) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of facultative sex ratios in a primitively eusocial bee. Science. 254:442–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (1986a) Ant reproductive strategies and sex allocation theory. Q Rev Biol 61:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (1986b) Sex-ratio determination within colonies of ants. Evolution 40:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1991) Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects I. sex allocation. Am Nat 137:83–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine WB (1986) Sewell Wright and evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 14:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers TL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1988) The influence of competition on plant reproduction. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 228–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW, Wallin K (1987) Offspring size and number: A life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am Nat 129:708–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1921) Correlation and causation. J Agric Res 20:557–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1923) The theory of path coefficients. A reply to Niles's criticism. Genetics 8:239–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1934) The method of path coefficients. Ann Math Stat 5:161–215

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Backus, V.L. Packaging of offspring by nests of the ant, Leptothorax longispinosus: parent-offspring conflict and queen-worker conflict. Oecologia 95, 283–289 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323501

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323501

Key words

Navigation