Summary
Elemental analysis of zeolites and fluid cracking catalysts is used as a way to monitor production and performance characteristics of these materials. An overview of the similarities and differences between two cold acid digestion methods for the analysis of a Y-type zeolite by ICP spectrometry is presented. Mass balance was used as a check for accuracy since no certified standards are available. Both methods obtained mass balances of 98%. Higher background continuum and higher detection limits were found using Method 1, whereas Method 2 requires very close matrix matching of standards and samples, and suffers from many spectral interferences in the emission wavelength region below 200 nm. Both methods have at least one element that cannot be determined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang Z, Bear BR, Fassel VA (1982) Pittsburgh Conference on Anal Chem and Applied Spectroscopy. Atlantic City, NJ
Hendel Y (1973) Analyst 98:450–451
Casetta B, Giaretta A, Rampazzo G (1983) At Spectrosc 4:152–154
Odegard M, Jarrell-ash Technical Application Note # 1
Langmyhr FJ, Paus PE (1986) Anal Chim Acta 43:397–408
Heaton MG, Buyer JS, Hershey JP, Duedall IW (1982) Environ Tech Letters 3:529–540
Tatro M, Glampa V, Collins R (1989) Spectroscopy 4:18–22
Tatro M (1990) Spectroscopy 5:16–19
Olesik JW, Moore AW (1990) Anal Chem 62:840–845
Case OP (1944) Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 16:309–311
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peru, D.A., Collins, R.J. Comparison of cold digestion methods for elemental analysis of a Y-type zeolite by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrometry. Fresenius J Anal Chem 346, 909–913 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322749
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322749