Skip to main content
Log in

Precision in analytical measurements: Expected values and consequences in geochemical analyses

  • Original Papers
  • Geochemical Analysis
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the years the authors have developed an empirical formula for the relative standard deviation among laboratories (RSDR, %) as a function of concentration C, expressed as a decimal fraction: RSDR=2(1−0.5log C)≈2C(−0.1505). This formula predicts that starting with a concentration of 100% (pure materials; C=1.00), RSDR will be 2%, increasing by a factor of 2 for each decrease in C of 2 orders of magnitude. It has been a useful guide to acceptable precision in the fields of agricultural, pharmaceutical, and nutritional chemical analysis. It has now been found that this formula is also useful for interpreting the quality of reported analyses of various reference materials available to geochemists. If a ratio is calculated of the found RSDR value to the RSDR value calculated from the formula, an easily interpreted limiting parameter is generated. A ratio >2 provides a rational reference point for interpreting the uncertainty of the analytical portion of the total variability of geochemical concentration estimates. Such a high ratio indicates excessive among-laboratories precision, reflecting large systematic errors on the part of one or more laboratories. The formula quantitates the concept of the transformation of the individual systematic errors of the laboratories into the random error of the group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horwitz W (1988) Pure Appl Chem 60:855–864; (1989) J Asoc Off Anal Chem 72:694–704

    Google Scholar 

  2. Puschel R (1968) Mikrochim Acta 783–801

  3. Horwitz W, Kamps LR, Boyer KW (1980) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 63:1344–1354

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horwitz W (1982) Anal Chem 54:A67-A76

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gladney ES, Roelandts I (1988) Geostand Newsl 12:63–118

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horwitz W, Albert R (1991) ACS Symposium Series 445, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 50–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flanagan FJ (1984) US Geol Surv Bull 1623, Washington, DC

  8. Gladney ES, O'Malley BT, Roelandts I, Gills TE (1987) Standard reference materials: Compilation of elemental concentration data for NBS clinical, biological, geological, and environmental standard reference materials. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 260-111. Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC, p 547

    Google Scholar 

  9. Currie LA (1978) Sources of error and the approach to accuracy in analytical chemistry. In: Kolthoff IM, Elving PJ, (eds) Treatise on analytical chemistry, 2nd edn, chap 4. Wiley, New York, pp 122, 124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horwitz, W., Albert, R. Precision in analytical measurements: Expected values and consequences in geochemical analyses. Fresenius J Anal Chem 351, 507–513 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322724

Keywords

Navigation