Skip to main content
Log in

Direct potentiometric immunoelectrodes

I. Immobilization of proteins on titanium wire electrodes

  • Original Papers
  • Clinical And Biological Analysis
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Antibodies immobilized on the surface of titanium wires may be used as direct potentiometric immunoelectrodes. In order to make full use of the potentially high selectivity and sensitivity of such sensors, careful investigations on the optimization of immobilizing proteins on such surfaces have been carried out. The final process uses a polystyrene coating on titanium wires with subsequent immobilization of proteins by azo coupling. The best suited buffer solution for IgG coating was found to be carbonate buffer pH 9.18 and a second coating with BSA could be shown to close yet active sites of titanium or polystyrene, thus preventing unspecific binding of any small molecules/antigens. This latter finding will be especially important with immunoelectrodes, where such small molecules would replace buffer ions at those sites, which would most probably yield high potential changes covering completely the desired measuring effects from the binding of a small antigen to an immobilized antibody.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto N, Nagasawa Y, Sawai M, Sudo T, Tsubomura H (1978) J Immunol Methods 22:308

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yamamoto N, Nagasawa Y, Shuto S, Tsubomura H, Sawai M, Okumura H (1980) Clin Chem 26:1569

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yamamoto N, Nakaoka S, Tanaka T, Shiro T, Honma K, Tsubomura H (1983) Proceedings on the International Meeting on Chemical Sensors, Fukuoka 1983, Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 699

  4. Janata J (1975) J Am Chem Soc 97:2914

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taniguchi I, Fujiyasu T, Tomimura S, Eguchi H, Yasukouchi K, Tsuji I, Unoki M (1986) Anal Sci 2:587

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto N, Shuto S, Tsubomura H (1981) Appl Biochem Biotech 6:319

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nakabayashi I, Tomida T, Kawashiro K, Morimoto S, Abe S (1985) Hyomenkagaku 6:206

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuruta H, Tsubomura H (1988) Appl Biochem Biotech 19:151

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nakabayashi I, Tomida T, Kawashiro K (1985) J Electrochem Soc 132:2611

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson M, Tauskela JS, Krull UJ (1987) In: Ngo TT (ed) Electrochemical sensors in immunological analysis, Plenum Press, New York, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Redepenning JG (1987) Trends Anal Chem 6:18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hornby WE, Filippusson H, McDonald A (1970) FEBS Lett 9:8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tijssen P (1987) Practice and theory of enzyme immunoassay, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gallati H, Brodbeck H (1982) J Clin Chem Biochem 20:221

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwalbe M (1983) Thesis, Univ of Mainz

  16. Schmid RD (1987) Nachr Chem Tech Lab 35:910

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang TMS (1975) In: Weetall HH (ed) Immobilized enzymes, antigens, antibodies and peptides, Marcel Dekker, New York, p 245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeifer, U., Baumann, W. Direct potentiometric immunoelectrodes. Fresenius J Anal Chem 343, 541–549 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322165

Keywords

Navigation