Skip to main content

Phenotypic plasticity in response to nitrate supply of an inherently fast-growing species from a fertile habitat and an inherently slow-growing species from an infertile habitat

Oecologia volume 96, pages 548–554 (1993)Cite this article

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate possible differences in plasticity between a potentially fast-growing and a potentially slow-growing grass species. To this end, Holcus lanatus (L.) and Deschampsia flexuosa (L.) Trin., associated with fertile and infertile habitats, respectively, were grown in sand at eight nitrate concentrations. When plants obtained a fresh weight of approximately 5 g, biomass allocation, specific leaf area, the rate of net photosynthesis, the organic nitrogen concentration of various plant parts and the root weight at different soil depths were determined. There were linear relationships between the morphological and physiological features studied and the In-transformed nitrate concentration supplied, except for the specific leaf area and root nitrogen concentration of H. lanatus, which did not respond to the nitrate concentration. The root biomass of H. lanatus was invariably distributed over the soil layers than that of D. flexuosa. However, D. flexuosa allocated more root biomass to lower soil depths with decreasing nitrate concentration, in contrast to H. lanatus, which did not respond. The relative response to nitrate supply, i.e. the value of a character at a certain nitrate level relative to the value of that character at the highest nitrate supply, was used as a measure for plasticity. For a number of parameters (leaf area ratio, root weight ratio, root nitrogen concentration, vertical root biomass distribution and rate of net photosynthesis per unit leaf weight) the potentially slow-growing D. flexuosa exhibited a higher phenotypic plasticity than the potentially fast-growing H. lanatus. These findings are in disagreement with current literature. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed in terms of differences in experimental approach as well as fundamental differences in specific traits between fast- and slow-growing grasses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Berendse F, Elberse WT (1989) Competition and nutrient losses from the plant. In: Lambers H, Cambridge ML, Konings H, Pons TL (eds) Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 269–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Berendse F, Elberse WT, Geerts RHME (1992) Competition and nitrogen loss from plants in grassland ecosystems. Ecology 73:46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot RGA (1989) The significance of size and morphology of root systems for nutrient acquisition and competition. In: Lambers H, Cambridge ML, Konings H, Pons TL (es) Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 299–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot RGA, Mensink M (1990) The effect of nitrogen supply on the size and morphology of root systems of perennial grasses from contrasting habitats. Plant Soil 129:291–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot RGA, Mensink M (1991) The influence of nitrogen availability on growth parameters of fast- and slow-growing perennial grasses. In: Atkinson D (ed) Plant root growth, an ecological perspective. (Special publication of the British Ecological Society). Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot RGA, Schildwacht PM, Lambers H (1992) Partitioning of nitrogen and biomass at a range of N-addition rates and their consequences for growth and gas exchange in two perennial grasses from inland dunes. Physiol Plant 86:152–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13:115–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD, Chadwick MJ, Jowett D, Snaydon RWD (1964) Experimental investigations into the mineral nutrition of several grass species. J Ecol 52:665–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R (1963) Some aspects of the equilibrium between overground and underground plant parts. Meded Inst Biol Scheik Onderz 213:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce JA, Ward DA (1985) Errors in differential infrared carbon dioxide analysis resulting from water vapour. Photosynth Res 6:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Caemmerer S von, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1988) Ecological aspects of plant mineral nutrition. Adv Min Nutr 3:161–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner K, Schulze ED (1992) The effect of nitrogen nutrition on growth and biomass partitioning of annual plants originating from habitats of different nitrogen availability. Oecologia 92:236–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Crick JC, Rincon JE (1986) The ecological significance of plasticity. In: Jennings DH, Trewavas AJ (eds) Plasticity in plants. The Company of Biologists, Cambridge, pp 5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hodgson JC, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R, Nicholls AO (1986) Stress and the coarse control of growth and root-shoot partitioning in herbaceous plants. Oikos 47:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingestad T (1982) Relative addition rate and external concentration, driving variables used in plant nutrition research. Plant Cell Environ. 443–453

  • Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv Ecol Res 23:187–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Posthumus F, Stulen F, Lanting L, Dijk SJ van de, Hofstra R (1981) Energy metabolism of Plantago major ssp. major as dependent on the supply of nutrients. Physiol Plant 51:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Pothmann P (1992) Growth and carbon economy of a fast-growing and slow-growing species as dependent on ontogeny. New Phytol 120:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Remkes C (1990) Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Van der Werf A, Atkin OK, Lambers H (1991) Respiratory energy requirements of roots vary with the potential growth rate of a plant species. Physiol Plant 83:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D (1991) Strategies of optimizing growth. In: Porter JH, Lawlor DW (eds) Plant growth: interactions with nutrition and environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Rorison IH (1985) A quantitative analysis of the relationship between root distribution and nitrogen uptake from soil by two grass species. J Soil Sci 36:71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Rorison IH (1987) Root hairs and plant growth at low nitrogen availabilities. New Phytol 107:681–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Rorison IH (1988) Plasticity in grass species in relation to nitrogen supply. Funct Ecol 2:249–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:667–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werf A, Welschen R, Lambers H (1992) Respiratory losses increase with decreasing inherent growth rate of a species and with decreasing nitrate supply: A search for explanations for these observations. In: Lambers H, Van der Plas LHW (eds) Molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects of plant respiration. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werf A, Van Nuenen M, Visser A, Lambers H (1993) Contribution of physiological and morphological plant traits to a species' competitive ability at high and low nitrogen supply: a hypothesis for inherently fast- and slow-growing monocotyledonous species. Oecologia 94:434–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring RH, McDonald AJS, Larsson S, Ericsson T, Wiren A, Arwidsson E, Ericsson A, Lohammar T (1985) Differences in chemical composition of plants grown at constant relative growth rates with stable mineral nutrition. Oecologia 66:157–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. C. A. D. M. Van de Vijver

    Present address: Dept. of Tropical Nature Conservation, Agricultural University of Wageningen, P.O. Box 8080, 6700 DD, Wageningen, Netherlands

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Utrecht University, Sorbonnclaan 16, 3584 CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    C. A. D. M. Van de Vijver, R. G. A. Boot, H. Poorter & H. Lambers

Authors
  1. C. A. D. M. Van de Vijver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. G. A. Boot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Poorter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Lambers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van de Vijver, C.A.D.M., Boot, R.G.A., Poorter, H. et al. Phenotypic plasticity in response to nitrate supply of an inherently fast-growing species from a fertile habitat and an inherently slow-growing species from an infertile habitat. Oecologia 96, 548–554 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320512

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320512

Key words

  • Biomass allocation
  • Nitrogen supply
  • Phenotypic plasticity
  • Photosynthesis
  • Root distribution