Skip to main content
Log in

Probing depth in monocular images

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally expected that depth (distance) is the internal representational primitive that corresponds to much of the perception of 3D. We tested this assumption in monocular surface stimuli that are devoid of distance information (due to orthographic projection and the chosen surface shape, with perspective projection used as a control) and yet are vividly three-dimensional. Slant judgments were found to be in close correspondence with the actual geometric slant of the stimuli; the spatial orientation of the surfaces was perceived accurately. The apparent depth in these stimuli was then tested by superimposing a stereo depth probe over the monocular surface. In both the perspective and orthographic projection the gradient of perceived depth, measured by matching the apparent depth of the stereo probe with that of the monocular surface at a series of locations, was substantial. The experiments demonstrate that in orthographic projection the visual system can compute from local surface orientation a depth quantity that is commensurate with the relative depth derived from stereo disparity. The depth data suggests that, at least in the near field, the zero value for relative depth lies at the same absolute depth as the stereo horopter (locus of zero stereo disparity). Relative to this zero value, the depth-from-slant computation seems to provide an estimate of distance information that is independent of the absolute distance to the surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chevrier J, Delorme A (1983) Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution and age. Perception 12:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Deregowski J (1970) Hudson's pictures in Pandora's box. J. Cross-Cultural Psychol 1:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R (1968) Visual illusions. Sci Am 218 (11):66–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R (1970) The intelligent eye. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy JM (1974) A psychology of picture perception. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JD, Whiteside TCD (1984) Binocular cues in the perception of distance of a point source of light. Perception 13:555–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono H, Comerford J (1977) Stereoscopic depth constancy. In: Epstein W (ed) Stability and constancy in visual perception: mechanisms and processes. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter M (1977) Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depth. Perception and Psychophysics 22:400–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter M (1979) Perception of depth: processing of simple positional disparity as a function of viewing distance. Percep Psychophys 25:209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens KA (1981) The visual interpretation of surface contours. Art Intell 217 (Special Issue on Computer Vision):47–74

  • Stevens KA (1983a) Slant-tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation. Biol Cybern 46:183–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens KA (1983b) The line of curvature constraint and the interpretation of 3-D shape from parallel surface contours. Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August, pp 1057–1061

  • Stevens KA (1983c) Tilt (the direction of surface slant): a neglected psychophysical variable. Percep Psychophys 33:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens KA (1986) Inferring shape from contours across surfaces. In: Pentland AP (ed) From pixels to predicates: recent advances in computational vision. Ablex, Norwood, pp 93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Topper DR, Simpson WA (1981) Depth perception in linear and inverse perspective pictures. Perception 10:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach H, Gillam B, Cardillo L (1979) Some consequence of stereoscopic depth constancy. Percep Psychophys 26:235–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach H, Zuckerman C (1963) The constancy of stereoscopic depth. Am J Psychol 76:404–412

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supproted by Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-K-84-0533. We gratefully acknowledge the suggestions of Jacob Beck regarding the experimental design, and the assistance provided by Cathryn Stanford

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevens, K.A., Brookes, A. Probing depth in monocular images. Biol. Cybernetics 56, 355–366 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319515

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319515

Keywords

Navigation