Summary
Experimental evidence is reported for flower-marking by honeybees (Apis mellifera ligustica) while they were foraging on an artificial patch of flowers yielding a continuous and equal flow of sucrose solution. Honeybees marked with scent and rejected all recently visited and nectar-depleted flowers. The short fade-out time of this scent allowed discrimination of flowers that temporarily provided no food. The repellent nature of this scent mark was demonstrated by the use of an air extractor connected to the patch; when the apparatus was turned on, the rejection behaviour disappeared. The movement pattern of foraging bees also contributed to foraging efficiency, as the probability of an immediate return to the flower just abandoned was very low. However, when a quick repeat visit took place, the presence of the repellent scent-mark promoted rapid rejection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler CG, Fletcher DJC, Watler D (1969) Nest entrance marking with pheromones by the honeybee Apis mellifera L. and by a wasp Vespula vulgaris L. Anim Behav 17: 142–147
Cameron S (1981) Chemical signals in bumble bee foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9: 257–260
Corbet SA, Willmer PG, Beamant JWL, Unwin DM, Prŷs-Jones OE (1979) Post-secretory determinants of sugar concentration in nectar. Plant Cell Environ 2: 293–308
Corbet SA, Kerslake CJC, Brown D, Morland NE (1984) Can bees select nectar-rich flowers in a patch? J Apic Res 23: 234–242
Ferguson AW, Free JB (1979) Production of a forage-marking pheromone by the honeybee. J Apic Res 18: 128–135
Frankie GW, Vinson SW (1977) Scent marking of passion flowers in Texas by females of Xylocopa virginica texana (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). J Kans Entomol Soc 50: 613–625
Free JB (1968) The conditions under which foraging honeybees expose their Nasonov glands. J Apic Res 7: 139–145
Free JB, Williams I (1972) The role of the Nasonov gland pheromone in crop communication by honeybees. Behaviour 41: 314–318
Free JB, Williams I, Pickett JA, Ferguson AW, Martin AP (1982) Attractiveness of (Z)-11-eicosen-1-ol to foraging honeybees. J Apic Res 21: 151–156
Frisch K von (1967) The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Belknap Press, Cambridge
Heinrich B (1979) Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bomblebees. Oecologia 40: 235–245
Kato M (1988) Bumblebee visits to Impatiens spp: pattern and efficiency. Occologia 76: 364–370
Lindauer M, Kerr WE (1958) Die gegenseitige Verständigung bei den stachelosen Bienen. Z Vergl Physiol 41: 405–434
Manning A (1956) Some aspects of the foraging behaviour of bumblebees. Behaviour 9: 164–201
Marden JH (1984) Remote perception of floral nectar by bumblebees. Oecologia 64: 232–240
Núñez JA (1967) Sammelbienen markieren versiegte Futterquellen durch Duft. Naturwissenschaften 54: 322–323
Núñez JA (1970) The relationship between sugar flow and foraging and recruiting behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellifera L). Anim Behav 18: 527–538
Núñez JA (1971) A simulator for learning studies in the bee Apis mellifera L. Acta Cient Venez 22: 101–106
Núñez JA (1982) Honeybee foraging strategies at a food source in relation to its distance from the hive and the rate of sugar flow. J Apic Res 21: 139–150
Ribbands CR (1955) Scent perception of the honey bee. Proc R Soc Lond B 143: 367–379
Schmitt U, Bertsch A (1990) Do foraging bumblebees scent-mark food sources and does it matter? Oecologia 82: 137–144
Thorp RN, Briggs DL, Estes JR, Erikson EH (1975) Nectar fluorescence under ultaviolet irradiation. Science 189: 476–478
Wetherwax PB (1986) Why do honeybees reject certain flowers? Oecologia 69: 567–570
Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis (2nd edn). Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giurfa, M., Núñez, J.A. Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89, 113–117 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319022
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319022