Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Discrimination of total body bone mineral density measured by dexa in vertebral osteoporosis

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) is the usual study to detect patients at risk for developing osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to compare the discriminative ability of total body BMD and its different subregions with the more usual measurements of BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck in women with osteoporotic fractures of the spine. The BMD was determined in 61 osteoporotic (at least one vertebral wedge fracture visible in the lateral X-ray film of the thoracic or lumbar spine) and 61 age-matched control women. Measurements were made by dual X-ray absortiometry (DXA) with a total body scanner. The BMD of the osteoporotic women was significantly lower at all skeletal areas compared with control (P<0.001). The diminution was less pronounced but still significant at the arms (P<0.05). The areas with the largest Z score in the osteoporotic group were antero-posterior lumbar spine (-1.78), femoral neck (-1.71), legs (-1.67), and total body (-1.59). There was no significant difference among the Z scores of the four above-mentioned measurements. The Z score of the arms (-0.79), spine (-1.12), and head (-1.29) were significantly lower than the Z score of the total body. The Z score of the pelvis was lower than the Z score of the total body but the difference only approached statistical significance (0.05> P<0.1). The Z score of the anteroposterior lumbar spine (-1.78) was compared with the Z score of the total (-1.12) lumbar (-0.93) and thoracic (-1.38) spine obtained as subregions of the total body. The best differentiation of the two populations was found by measuring the antero-posterior lumbar spine directly (P<0.01-P<0.001). In conclusion, the diagnostic differentiation of the total body BMD is similar to that of the anteroposterior lumbar spine and proximal femur measurements. In addition, the measurement of the total body BMD has a lower error and enables simultaneous evaluation of the different subregions of the skeleton as well as the body composition. The BMD of the spine as a subregion of the total body cannot replace the direct evaluation of the anteroposterior lumbar spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton L, Kan S, Wahner H, Riggs B (1988) Lifetime fracture risk. An approach to hip fracture risk assessment based on bone mineral density and age. J Clin Epidemiol 41:985–994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M, Schultz E (1988) Bone density of the radius, spine and proximal femur in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 3:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mautalen C, Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Fromm G (1990) Bone diminution of osteoporotic females at different skeletal sites. Calcif Tissue Int 46:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vega E, Mautalen C, Gomez H, Garrido A, Melo L, Sahores AO (1991) Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis Int 1:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffin MG, Rupich RC, Avioli LV, Pacifici R (1991) A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:1164–1169

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of the hip fractures. Lancet;341:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1991) Preexisting fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923

    Google Scholar 

  8. Overgaard K, Hansen MA, Riis BJ, Christiansen C (1992) Discriminatory ability of bone mass measurements (SPA and DEXA) for fractures in elderly postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 50:30–35

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nilas L, Podenphant J, Riis BJ, Gotfredsen A (1987) Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm. J Nucl Med 28:960–965

    Google Scholar 

  10. Need AG, Nordin BEC (1990) Which bone to measure? Osteoporosis Int 1:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nuti R, Martini G (1992) Measurements of bone mineral density by DXA total body absorptiometry in different skeletal sites in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone 13:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gotfredsen A, Podenphant J, Nilas L, Christiansen C (1989) Discriminative ability of total body bone mineral measured by dual photon absortiometry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 49:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pun K, Wong F, Loh T (1991) Rapid postmenopausal loss of total body and regional bone mass in normal southern chinese females in Hong Kong. Osteoporosis Int 1:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nuti R, Martini G (1993) Effects of age and menopause on bone density at entire skeleton in healthy and osteoporotic women. Osteoporosis Int 3:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ohmura A, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Okamoto S, Taniguchi M, Katsuno H, Inoue T (1992) Total body bone mineral in normal and osteoporotic women. 14th Ann Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Minneapolis, USA (S197)

  16. Genant H, Wu CH, Kuijk C, Nevitt M (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vega E, Bagur A, Mautalen C (1993) Densidad mineral ósea en mujeres osteoporóticas y normales de Buenos Aires. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 53:211–216

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mazess R, Barden H (1990) Interrelationship among bone densitometry sites in normal young women. Bone Miner 11:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mazess R, Barden H, Mautalen C, Vega E (1994) Normalization of spine densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:541–548

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson HA (1990) Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for total body and regional bone mineral and soft tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 51:1106–1112

    Google Scholar 

  21. Russell Aulet M, Wang J, Thornton J, Pierson RN (1991) Comparison of dual photon absorptiometry systems for total body bone and soft tissue measurement: dual energy x-ray versus Gadolinium 153. J Bone Miner Res 6:411–415

    Google Scholar 

  22. Friedl KE, DeLuca JP, Marchitelli LJ, Vogel JA (1992) Reliability of body fat estimations from a four compartment model by using density, body water and bone mineral measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 55:764–770

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dawson Hughes B, Harris S (1992) Regional changes in body composition by time of year: healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 56:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rico H, Hernandez R, Revilla M, Villa L, Alvarez de Buergo M, Cuende E (1993) Bone changes in postmenopausal Spanish women. Calcif Tissue Int 52:103–106

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rico H, Revilla M, Hernandez ER, Villa LF, Alvarez del Buergo M (1992) Is pelvic BMC assessed through dual energy X ray absorptiometry an appropriate anatomical area for bone mass estimation in women? Clin Rheumatol 11:508–511

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nuti R, Martini G, Gennari C (1993) Total body, spine and femur dual X ray absortiometry in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 53:388–393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sección Osteopatías Médicas, Department of Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas, José de San Martín University of Buenos Aires, Cordoba 2351 (1120), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    A. Bagur, E. Vega & C. Mautalen

Authors
  1. A. Bagur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Mautalen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagur, A., Vega, E. & Mautalen, C. Discrimination of total body bone mineral density measured by dexa in vertebral osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 56, 263–267 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318044

Key words

Search

Navigation