Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 96, Issue 1, pp 9–18 | Cite as

Pyrrolizidine alkaloid deters ant predators of Utetheisa ornatrix eggs: effects of alkaloid concentration, oxidation state, and prior exposure of ants to alkaloid-laden prey

  • James F. Hare
  • Thomas Eisner
Original Papers

Abstract

To examine the chemical defense of lepidopteran eggs towards ant predators, eggs of the arctiid moth Utetheisa ornatrix were offered to laboratory colonies of the ant Leptothorax longispinosus. The ants rapidly devoured Utetheisa eggs produced by parents reared on an alkaloid-free diet, but left eggs that had been endowed with parental alkaloid largely unmolested. That defense can be attributed directly to the presence of a pyrrolizidine alkaloid since topical application of monocrotaline in either its free base or N-oxide state conferred protection on otherwise palatable eggs. The N-oxide and free base were not equally effective in conferring protection however; free-base treated eggs were subject to greater predation than N-oxide treated eggs after 24 h. The emergence of differential alkaloid effectiveness only after prolonged exposure is consistent with the notion that chemical protection is seldom absolute. That difference was resolved only when the otherwise food-deprived ants exceeded a certain threshold of hunger. The efficacy of applied monocrotaline as a predator deterrent increased with increasing concentration of N-oxide, but was lowest for eggs treated with an intermediate concentration of free base. The latter concentration effect likely represents an artefact of the behaviour of the ant colonies offered eggs treated with an intermediate concentration, as those colonies were the most voracious predators in reference tests with palatable eggs. In addition to the immediate deterrent value of pyrrolizidine alkaloid, ant colonies that had been exposed to alkaloid-laden eggs subsequently avoided even palatable, unprotected eggs offered 33 days later. Our data provide the first demonstration of such long-term avoidance of chemically protected lepidopteran prey by an invertebrate. The discovery of a mechanism promoting learned avoidance on the part of ant predators has important ramifications to egg-laying strategies of female Utetheisa, both in terms of the dispersion of eggs, and the extent to which eggs are provisioned with alkaloid.

Key words

Ant predation Lepidopteran eggs Chemical defense Learned avoidance Automimicry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alloway TM (1979) Raiding behaviour of two species of slavemaking ants, Harpagoxenus americanus (Emery) and Leptothorax duloticus Wesson (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim Behav 27:202–210Google Scholar
  2. Alloway TM, Buschinger A, Talbot M, Stuart R, Thomas C (1982) Polygyny and polydomy in three North American species of the ant genus Leptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 89:249–274Google Scholar
  3. Alloway TM, Leighl A, Ryckman D (1991) Diet does not affect intercolonial fighting in Leptothoracine ants. Ins Soc 38:189–192Google Scholar
  4. Ayre GL, Hitchon DE (1968) The predation of tent caterpillars, Malacosoma americanum (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) by ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Can Ent 100:823–826Google Scholar
  5. Berenbaum MR, Miliczky E (1984) Mantids and milkweed bugs: efficacy of aposematic coloration against invertebrate predators. Am Midl Nat 111:64–68Google Scholar
  6. Bernays EA, Cornelius ML (1989) Generalist caterpillar prey are more palatable than specialists for the generalist predator Iridomyrmex humilis. Oecologia 79:427–430Google Scholar
  7. Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Ent 53:217–232Google Scholar
  8. Blaustein AR (1988) Ecological correlates and potential functions of kin recognition and kin association in anuran larvae. Behav Genet 18:449–464Google Scholar
  9. Bogner F, Eisner T (1991) Chemical basis of egg cannibalism in a caterpillar (Utetheisa ornatrix). J Chem Ecol 17:2063–2075Google Scholar
  10. Boppré M (1990) Lepidoptera and pyrrolizidine alkaloids — exemplification of complexity in chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol 16:165–185Google Scholar
  11. Bowers MD, Larin Z (1989) Acquired chemical defense in the lycaenid butterfly, Eumaeus atala. J Chem Ecol 15:1133–1146Google Scholar
  12. Buschinger A, Pfeifer E (1988) Effects of nutrition on brood production and slavery in ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ins Soc 35:61–69Google Scholar
  13. Campbell RW, Torgersen TR, Srivastava N (1983) A suggested role for predaceous birds and ants in the population dynamics of the western spruce budworm. For Sci 29:779–790Google Scholar
  14. Carson R (1987) Silent Spring (25th anniversary edition). Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Conner WE, Eisner T, Vander Meer RK, Guerrero A, Ghiringelli D, Meinwald J (1980) Sex attractant of an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): a pulsed chemical signal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:55–63Google Scholar
  16. Conner WE, Eisner T, Vander Meer RK, Guerrero A, Meinwald J (1981) Precopulatory sexual interaction in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): role of a pheromone derived from dietary alkaloids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:227–235Google Scholar
  17. Conner WE, Roach B, Benedict E, Meinwald J, Eisner T (1990) Courtship pheromone production and body size as correlates of larval diet in males of the arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. J. Chem Ecol 16:543–552Google Scholar
  18. Dussourd DE, Ubik K, Harvis C, Resch J, Meinwald J, Eisner T (1988) Biparental defensive endowment of eggs with acquired plant alkaloid in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5992–5996Google Scholar
  19. Dussourd DE, Harvis CA, Meinwald J, Eisner T (1991) Pheromonal advertisement of a nuptial gift by a male moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9224–9227Google Scholar
  20. Eisner T (1982) For the love of nature: exploration and discovery at biological field stations. BioScience 32:321–326Google Scholar
  21. Eisner T, Eisner M (1991) Unpalatability of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing moth Utetheisa ornatrix, and its larva, to wolf spiders. Psyche 98:111–118Google Scholar
  22. Eisner T, Meinwald YC (1965) Defensive secretion of a caterpillar (Papilio). Science 150:1733–1735Google Scholar
  23. Eisner T, Meinwald J (1987) Alkaloid-derived pheromones and sexual selection in Lepidopterea. In: (Prestwich G.D., Blomquist G.J.) (eds) Pheromone Biochemistry Academic Press, Florida, pp 251–269Google Scholar
  24. Fiala B, Maschwitz U (1990) Studies of the south east asian antplant association Crematogaster borneensis/Macaranga: adaptations of the ant partner. Ins Soc 37:212–231Google Scholar
  25. Hinton HE (1981) Biology of Insect Eggs, Vol. I. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Honda K (1983) Defensive potential of components of the larval osmaterial secretion of papilionid butterflies against ants. Physiol Entomol 8:173–179Google Scholar
  27. Hrdy I, Jasic J, Novák K, Ruzicka Z, Vallo V, Weismann L, Zeleny J (1968) The sugar-cane borer, Diatraea saccharalis, in Cuba. I. Bionomics and Ecology. Acta ent. bohemoslov. 65:436–457Google Scholar
  28. Johnson AE, Molyneux RJ, Merrill GB (1985) Chemistry of toxic range plants. Variation in pyrrolizidine alkaloid content of Senecio, Amsinckia, and Crotalaria species. J Agric Food Chem 33:50–55Google Scholar
  29. Kfir A (1992) Seasonal abundance of the stem borer Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its parasites on summer grain crops. J Econ Entomol 85:518–529Google Scholar
  30. Lashomb JH, Metterhouse W, Chianese R (1988) Use of biological control measures in the intensive management of insect pests in New Jersey. Am J Altern Agric 3:77–82Google Scholar
  31. Madhun YA, Freed VH (1990) Pesticides in the soil environment: processes, impacts, and modelling. In: H.H.Cheng (ed) Impact of pesticides on the environment Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 429–466Google Scholar
  32. Martyn EJ (1965) Studies on the ecology of Oncopera intricata Walker (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Aust J Zool 13:811–815Google Scholar
  33. Mattocks AR (1969) Dihydropyrrolizidine derivatives from unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids. J Chem Soc C Organic 8:1155–1162Google Scholar
  34. Mattocks AR (1986) Chemistry and Toxicology of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagy M (1979) The effect of Lepidoptera larvae consumption on the leaf production of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Acta Bot Acad Sci Hung 27:141–151Google Scholar
  36. Pasteur G (1982) A classificatory review of mimicry systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:169–199Google Scholar
  37. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225Google Scholar
  38. Rothschild M, Alpin RP, Cockrum PA, Edgar JA, Fairweather P, Lees R (1979) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in arctiid moths (Lep.) with a discussion on host plant relationships and the role of these secondary plant substances in the Arctiidae. Biol J Linn Soc 12:305–326Google Scholar
  39. Schneider D (1992) 100 years of pheromone research an essay on Lepidoptera. Naturwissenschaften 79:241–250Google Scholar
  40. Sharma RK, Kasture AV, Kapoor KK, Atal CK (1965) Phytochemical investigation of the genus Crotalaria. Part V. Occurrence of tertiary bases and their N-oxides in Indian Crotalaria. Lloydia 28:209–211Google Scholar
  41. Sillén-Tullberg B (1988) Evolution of gregariousness in aposematic butterfly larvae: a phylogenetic analysis. Evolution 42:293–305Google Scholar
  42. Storey GK, Aneshansley DJ, Eisner T (1991) Parentally provided alkaloid does not protect eggs of Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) against entomopathogenic fungi. J Chem Ecol 17:687–693Google Scholar
  43. Tilman D (1978) Cherries, ants and tent caterpillars: timing of nectar production in relation to susceptibility of caterpillars to ant predation. Ecology 59:686–692Google Scholar
  44. Vrieling K, Soldaat LL, Smit W (1991) The influence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids of Senecio jacobaea on Tyria jacobaeae, Brachycaudus cardii and Haplothrips senecionis. Neth J. Zool 41:228–239Google Scholar
  45. Whitcomb WH (1967) Bollworm predators in Northeast Arkansas. Ark Fm Res 16:2Google Scholar
  46. Witz BW (1990) Antipredator mechanisms in arthropods: a twenty year literature survey. Fla Ent 73:71–99Google Scholar
  47. Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Hare
    • 1
  • Thomas Eisner
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations