Skip to main content
Log in

Density dependence in rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested for the existence of density dependence in annual adult rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) data from Montana, USA (1951–1991). Statistical density dependence was, in the sense of a stochastic equilibrium or return tendency, detected in all of the grasshopper mean density time-series from the three major physiographic regions of the state, Northern Glaciated Plains, Southern Unglaciated Plains, and Western Mountains. Parameters were estimated for a model that described the stochastic equilibrium characteristics of regional mean densities. The analyses showed that rangeland grasshopper regional densities fluctuate according to gamma distribution with a mean of 6.1–6.3 grasshoppers per m2. Further, when regions exhibit outbreaks, the resulting infestation period (duration of outbreak) is short, spanning only a few generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aptech Syst. Inc. (1988) The GAUSS System Version 2.0 Aptech Syst. Inc. 2625 196th Place S.E., Kent. Wash. 98042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry JS, Kemp WP, Onsager JA (1991) Integration of simulation models and an expert system for management of rangeland grasshoppers. AI Appl. 5: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA (1978) Population cycles of the Douglas-fir tussock moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): the time-delay hypothesis. Can Entomol 110: 513–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA (1987) Equilibrium or non-equilibrium: Is that the question? Bull Ecol Soc Am 68: 500–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA (1989) The conceptual foundation of ecological dynamics. Bull Ecol Soc Am 70: 234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA (1991) Stabilization or regulation: what it all means! Oecologia 86: 140–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA, Stenseth NC, Isaev AS (1987) Natural regulation of herbivorous forest insect populations. Oecologia 71: 174–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Capinera JL, Horton DR (1989) Geographic variation in effects of weather on grasshopper infestation. Environ Ent 18: 8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RM, Skold MD, Berry JS, Kemp WP (1992) The economic threshold for grasshopper control on public rangelands. J Agric Res Econ 17: 56–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster JP (1963) The population dynamics of grasshoppers and locusts. Biol Rev Cambr Philos Soc 38: 490–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster JP, Pollard E (1986) Spatial heterogeneity, stochasticity and the detection of density dependence in animal populations. Oikos 46: 413–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer PJ (1990) On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing. 3. What do we conclude from significant test results? Oecologia 83: 38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer PJ (1991) Seeing the trees for the wood: random walks or bounded fluctuations of population size? Oecologia 86: 484–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis B (1989) Stochastic differential equations as insect population models. In: McDonald L, Manly B, Lockwood J, Logan J (eds) Estimation and Analysis of Insect Populations. Proceedings of a Conference held in Laramie, WY, January 25–29, 1988, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis B, Costantino RF (1988) Analysis of steady-state populations with the gamma abundance model: application to Tribolium. Ecology 69: 1200–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis B, Patil GP (1984) The gamma distribution and weighted multimodal gamma distributions as models of population abundance. Math Biosci 68: 187–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis B, Taper M (1993) Density dependence in time series observations of natural populations: Estimation and testing. Ecol Monogr (in press)

  • Dennis B, Munholland PL, Scott JM (1991) Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecol Monogr 61: 115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RL (1960) Relationship between grasshopper abundance and weather conditions in Saskatchewan, 1930–1958 Can Entomol 92: 619–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding DJ, Brusven MA (1990) Historical analysis of grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) population responses to climate in southern Idaho. Environ Entomol 9: 1786–1791

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage SH, Mukerji MK (1977) A perspective of grasshopper population distribution in Saskatchewan and interrelationship with weather. Environ Entomol 6: 469–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenberg G (1974) A simulation model for testing the dynamics of a grasshopper population. Ecology 56: 645–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1990) Density dependence, regulation and variability in animal populations. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 330: 141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt GB (1983) Control of grasshoppers on rangeland in the United States—A perspective. J Range Manage 36: 202–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt GB, Onsager JA (1982) A method for forecasting potential losses from grasshopper feeding on northern mixed prairie forages. J Range Manage 35: 53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert DW, Logan JA (1983) A simulation model of the migratory grasshopper (Melanoplus sanquinipes). In: Lauenroth WK, Skogerboe GV, Flug M (eds) Analysis of Ecological Systems State-of-the-art in Ecological Modeling. Developments in Environmental Modeling 5. Elsevier Sci Pub Co, pp 323–334

  • Joern A, Gaines SB (1990) Population dynamics and regulation in grasshoppers. In: Chapman RF, Joern A (eds) Biology of grasshoppers. Wiley, New York, pp 415–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP (1987) Probability of outbreak for rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Montana: Application of Markovian principles. J Econ Entomol 80: 1100–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP (1992a) Rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) community structure: A working hypothesis. Environ Entomol 21: 461–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP (1992b) Temporal variation in rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) communities in the steppe region of Montana, USA. Can Entomol 124: 437–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP, Harvey SJ, O'Neill KM (1990) Patterns of vegetation and grasshopper community composition. Oecologia 83: 299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP, Kalaris TM, Quimby WF (1989) Rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) spatial variability: Macroscale population assessment. J Econ Entomol 82: 1270–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp WP, Onsager JA, Lemmon HA (1988) Rangeland grasshopper treatment selection: application of expert system technology to decision support for resource-based management. AI Appl Nat Res Manage 2: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh EG (1968) The ecological role of Volterra's equations. In: Gerstenhaber M (ed) Some Mathamatical Problems in Biology. Am Math Soc Prov, pp 1–61

  • Lockwood JA, Lockwood DR (1991) Rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) population dynamics: Insights from catastrophe theory. Environ Entomol 20: 970–980

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCarthy HR (1956) A ten year study of the climatology of Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus (Sauss.) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Saskatchewan. Can J Agric Sci 36: 445–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagne C, Munn LC, Nielson GA, Rogers JW, Hunter HE (1982) Soils of Montana. Mont Agric Exp Stn Bull 744

  • Patel JK, Read CB (1982) Handbook of the normal distribution. Marcel Dekker, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Lakhani KH, Rothery P (1987) The detection of density-dependence from a series of annual census. Ecology 68: 2046–2055

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddingius J, Den Boer PJ (1989) On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing. I. Power estimated and estimating errors. Oecologia 78: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodell CF (1977) A grasshopper model for a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 58: 227–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama T (1977) Population persistence and density dependence. Ecol Monogr 47: 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong H (1990) Non-linear time series: a dynamical system approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1990) Rarity of density dependence or population regulation with lags? Nature 344: 660–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P, Taylor AD (1991) Complex dynamics in ecological time series. Ecology 73: 289–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P, Lorio Jr. PL, Taylor AD, Billings RF (1991) Why do populations of southern pine beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) fluctuate? Environ Ent 20: 401–409

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. Undated. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Program, Domestic Program Manual, Hyattsville, MD

  • Wolda H (1989) The equilibrium concept and density dependence tests, What does it all mean? Oecologia 81: 430–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H, Dennis B (1993) Density dependence tests, are they? Oecologia (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemp, W.P., Dennis, B. Density dependence in rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 96, 1–8 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318023

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318023

Key words

Navigation