Skip to main content
Log in

The dorsal surface of the animal pole of the just laid quail egg, studied with SEM

  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The epiblast and the surface of the perigerminal yolk of the just laid quail blastoderm were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The dorsal surface structures are microvilli, mainly along the cell borders. The scarcity of the dimples does not support that ingression occurs at this stage. Flat or round cells on the epiblast are possibly deep layer cells that failed to incorporate after passing through the epiblast. The majority of the blastoderms have an irregular margin. The large edge cells possess microvilli at their borders only. A few blastoderms, probably the more developed, have a smooth edge with closely packed cells. The margin of these germs shows round cells and lamellae that could be protruded by deep cells. The process of cell rounding and extension of lamellae may be the onset of the formation of the margin of overgrowth. Concentric zones are present on the surface of the perigerminal yolk, on which microvilli and blebs are found near the germ. The presence of cell projections on the perigerminal surface suggests its living nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie M, Heaysman J, Pegrum SM (1971) the locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res 67:359–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TF (1951) Techniques for the preservation of three-dimensional structure in preparing specimens for the electron microscope. Trans NY Acad Sci Ser II 13:130–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakst MR (1978) Scanning electron microscopy of the vitelline membrane of the hen ovum. J Reprod Fert 52:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft M, Bellairs R (1974) The onset of differentiation of the chick embryo (SEM and TEM). Cell Tissue Res 155:399–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellairs R (1971) In: Developmental processes in higher vertebrates, Logos Press Ltd. London, p 366

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellairs R, Boyde A, Heaysman JE (1969) The relationship between the edge of the chick blastoderm and the vitelline membrane. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 163:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellairs R, Lorenz FW, Dunlap T (1978) Cleavage in the chick embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 43:55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Blount M (1909) The early development of the pigeon's egg, with special reference to polyspermy and the origin of the periblast nuclei. J Morphol 20:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff EAG, Overton J (1979) Organization of the migrating chick epiblast edge: attachment sites, cytoskeleton and early developmental stages. Dev Biol 72:291–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie JR (1974) Behavioural transformation in chick yolk sac cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 31:599–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie JR (1976) The mechanism of chick blastoderm expansion. J Embryol Exp Morphol 35:559–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie JR, Pegrum SM (1971) Organization of the chick blastoderm edge. J Embryol Exp Morphol 26:623–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyal-Giladi H, Kochav S (1976) From cleavage to primitive streak formation: a complementary table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. I. General morphology. Dev Biol 49:321–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargeix N (1964) La caille domestique (Coturnix coturnix japonica) Ponte et étude de l'oeuf non incubé. Arch Anat Histol Embryol (Stresh) 97:275–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger V, Hamilton HI (1951) A series of normally stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton H (1965) In: Lillie's development of the chick Holt, New York, pp 46–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudspeth AJ (1982) The recovery of local transepithelial resistance following single-cell lesions. Exp Cell Res 138:331–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson W (1938) The early development of the avian embryo. I. Endoderm formation. J Morphol 62:415–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochav S, Ginsburg M, Eyal-Giladi H (1980) From cleavage to primitive streak formation: a complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. II. Microscopic anatomy and cell population dynamics. Dev Biol 79:269–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrbach H (1935) Beobachtungen an der Keimscheibe des Hühnchens vor dem Erscheinen des Primitivstreifens. Z Anatomie 104:635–652

    Google Scholar 

  • New DAT (1959) The adhesive properties and expansion of the chick blastoderm. J Embryol Exp Morphol 7:146

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson JT (1909) Gastrulation in the pigeon's egg. A morphological and experimental study. J Morphol 20:45–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Radice GP (1980) The spreading of epithelial cells during wound closure in Xenopus larvae. Dev Biol 76:26–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson M, Armstrong J, Armstrong P (1980) Adhesive and non-adhesive membrane domains of amphibian embryo cells

  • Trinkaus JP (1980) Formation of protrusions of the cell surface during tissue cell movement. In: Tumor cell surfaces and malignancy. Alan R Liss Inc New York, pp 887–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Baer KE (1828) Ueber die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere. Beobachtungen und Reflextion. I. Entwicklungsgeschichte des Hühnchens im Eie. Borntrager Königsberg, p 315

  • Weinberger C, Brick I (1982) Primary hypoblast development in the chick. I. Scanning electron microscopy of normal development. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 191:119–126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andries, L., Vakaet, L. & Vanroelen, C. The dorsal surface of the animal pole of the just laid quail egg, studied with SEM. Anat Embryol 166, 135–147 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317949

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317949

Key words

Navigation