Abstract
I assessed the effects of the sampling error of input variables on the energy-maximizing diets of 14 grassland herbivores that Belovsky (1986) predicted using a linear programming model of optimal foraging. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the error reported in the estimates of the variables generated wide confidence intervals on predicted diets of the species. Given this imprecision in the predictions, the predicted diets that Belovsky reported were unexpectedly similar to the observed diets. The high correlation between predicted and observed diets reported by Belovsky was only attained in 0.01% of the simulation runs. Simulations assuming a variety of relationships between the sampling error in the different variables did not alter this conclusion. Incorporating the sampling error in even a single variable causes wide variability in the predicted diets. This analysis suggests that the high levels of accuracy reported for the linear programming approach will be difficult to repeat.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Belovsky GE (1978) Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor Popul Biol 14:76–104
Belovsky GE (1981) Food plant selection by a generalist herbivore: the moose. Ecol 62:1020–1031
Belovsky GE (1984) Summer diet optimization by the beaver. Am Midl Nat 111:209–222
Belovsky GE (1986) Optimal foraging and community structure: implications for a guild of grassland herbivores. Oecologia 70:35–52
Belovsky GE (1990) A reply to Hobbs. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioral mechanisms of food selection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 415–422
Belovsky GE, Schmitz OJ (1993) Owen-Smith's evaluation of herbivore foraging models: what is constraining. Evol Ecol 7:525–529
Hobbs NT (1990) Diet selection by generalist herbivores: a test of the linear programming model. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioral mechanisms of food selection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 395–414
Owen-Smith N (1993) Evaluating optimal diet models for an African browsing ruminant, the kudu: how constraining are the assumed constraints? Evol Ecol 7:499–524
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ward D (1993) Foraging theory, like all other fields of science, needs multiple working hypotheses. Oikos 67:376–378
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huggard, D.J. A linear programming model of herbivore foraging: imprecise, yet successful?. Oecologia 100, 470–474 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317869
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317869