Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns of coexistence in sexual and asexual species of Cnemidophorus lizards

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The lizard genus Cnemidophorus (family Teiidae) contains sexual as well as parthenogenetic species. The theoretical two-fold fitness advantage of asexuality does not translate into any obvious distributional or numerical superiority of the parthenogenic species in the southwestern US and northern Mexico where their ranges overlap. I tested the prediction that the genetically diverse sexual species should have a higher between-individual niche width than a similar sympatric asexual species by studying the prey in stomach contents of sympatric and allopatric populations of C. tigris (sexual) and C. sonorae (asexual) in southern Arizona. The expectation proved true for niche breadths based on both prey length and prey taxa categories. The within-individual component of niche breadth was not different between species. Meaningful comparisons between species in sympatry and allopatry are confounded by the uncontrolled differences in the availability and diversity of food items between sites. Before the generality of these results can be assessed the study should be repeated in other areas where sexual and asexual species are syntopic and of similar body size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell G (1982) The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown WM, Wright JW (1979) Mitochondrial DNA analyses and the origin and relative age of parthenogenetic lizards (Genus Cnemidophorus). Science 203:1247–1249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1975) Species number, density compensation and colonizing ability of lizards on islands in the Gulf of California. Ecology 56:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1979) Character displacement and coevolution in some Cnemidophorus lizards. Fortschr Zool 24:235–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1983) Size-similarity and sympatry in Cnemidophorus lizards. Ch. 14 In: Huey R, Schoener T, Pianka E (eds) Lizard Ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 297–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ, Bender EA (1981) Is recombination advantageous in fluctuating and spatially heterogeneous environments? J Theor Biol 90:181–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ, Taper ML (1986) On the coexistence of asexual and sexual species. Evolution 40:366–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1971) Selection in density regulated populations. Ecology 52:469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuellar O (1971) Reproduction and mechanism of meiotic restitution in the parthenogenetic lizard, Cnemidophorus uniparens. J Morphol 133:139–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cucllar O (1976) Intraclonal histocompatibility in a parthenogenetic lizard: evidence of genetic homogeneity. Science 193:150–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuellar O (1977) Animal parthenogenesis. Science 197:837–843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dessauer HC, Cole CJ (1989) Diversity between and within nominal forms of unisexual teiid lizards. In: Dawley RM, Bogard JP (eds) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Museum, Albany, NY, pp 49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Densmore LD, Moritz CC, Wright JW, Brown WM (1989) Motochondrial-DNA analyses and the origin and relative age of parthenogenetic lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). IV. Nive sexlineatus-group unisexuals. Evolution 43:969–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echternacht AC (1967) Ecolocal relationships of two species of the lizard genus Cnemidophorus in the Santa Rita Mountains of Arizona. Am Midl Nat 78:448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckel DG, Roughgarden J (1979) A technique for estimating the size of lizard populations Ecology 60:966–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe CH, Wright JW (1964) Species of the Cnemidophorus exsanguis subgroup of whiptail lizards. J Ariz Acad Sci 3:78–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslin TP (1968) Taxonomic problems in parthenogenetic vertebrates. Zoologica 17:219–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medica PA (1967) Food habits, habitat preference, reproduction, and diurnal activity in four sympatric species of whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus) in South Central New Mexico. Bull S Calif Acad Sci 66:251–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JC (1979) Ecology of southeastern Arizona whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus: Teiidae): population densities, resource partitioning, and niche overlap. Can J Zool 57:1487–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neaves WB (1969) Adenosine deaminase phenotypes among sexual and parthenogenetic lizards in the Genus Cnemidophorus (Teiidae). J Exp Zool 171:175–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker ED (1979a) Phenotypic consequences of parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus lizards. I. Relative variability in parthenogenetic and sexual populations. Evolution 33:1150–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker ED (1979b) Phenotypic consequences of parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus lizards. II. Similarity of C. tesselatus to its sexual parental species. Evolution 33:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker ED, Selander RK (1976) The organization of genetic diversity in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus. Genetics 84:791–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL (1983) Appendix: Monto Carlo analyses in ecology. In: Huey R, Schoener T, Pianka E (eds) Lizard ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 290–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryti RL, Case TJ (1986) Spatial arrangement and diet overlap between colonies of desert ants. Oecologia 62:401–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schall JJ (1976) Comparative ecology of sympatric parthenogenetic and bisexual species of Cnemidophorus. Ph.D. Dissertation. Univ. of Texas, Austin

  • Schenck RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1986) Spatial and temporal factors affecting the coexistence among sexual and clonal forms of Poeciliopsis. Evolution 40:1060–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scudday JF, Dixon JR (1973) Diet and feeding behavior of teiid lizards from Trans-Pecos, Texas. Southwest Nat 18:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell TM (1970) Meiotic mechanisms of naturally occurring unisexual vertebrates. Am Nat 104:433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1970) Heterozygosity and genetic polymorphism in parthenogenetic animals. In: Hecht MR, Steere VC (eds) Essays in evolutions and genetics in honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 237–262

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1978) Modes of Speciation. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright JW (1968) Variation in three sympatric sibling species of whiptail lizards, genus Cnemidophorus. J Herpetol 1:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JW, Lowe CH (1968) Weeds, polyploids, parthenogenesis and the geographical and ecological distribution of all-female species of Cnemidophorus. Copeia 1968:129–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar HH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel RG (1965) Variation in and distribution of the unisexual lizard, Cnemidophorus tesselatus. Am Mus Novit 2235:1–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, C-016, University of California, San Diego, 92093, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Ted J. Case

Authors
  1. Ted J. Case
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Case, T.J. Patterns of coexistence in sexual and asexual species of Cnemidophorus lizards. Oecologia 83, 220–227 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317756

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317756

Key words

Search

Navigation