Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of spatial distribution in a population of the subalpine butterfly Oeneis chryxus

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper describes temporally varying determinants of the spatial distribution of adults in an insect population and the relationship between that distribution and the mating system. Male Oeneis chryxus butterflies were distributed nonrandomly throughout a sloping Colorado meadow divided horizontally by a dirt road into an upper and lower slope. Over an eight-year period of intensive study, the proportion of males located on the road, the upper slope, and the lower slope varied as a function of population size and sex ratio. In each year, more than half of the male population aggregated on sections of the road in a distinct and recurring pattern that was not correlated with the distribution of any food resource or thermal regime. Females were usually extremely scarce and not distributed in any pattern apparent from the few observations of them. Areas densely occupied by males were associated with visual landmarks. We hypothesize that the male distribution is determined by a pattern of movement of receptive females toward these landmarks. The road offers a thermally favorable environment with an unobstructed view in which to await the passage of scarce females. The mating system in this population has several lek-like features and supports the prediction that landmark mating is a favored strategy under conditions of female scarcity and wide dispersal of resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock J (1981) Lek territoriality in the tarantula hawk wasp Hemipepsis ustulata (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1983) Territoriality by hilltopping males of the great purple hairstreak, Atlides halesus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): convergent evolution with a pompilid wasp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1985) Hilltopping in the Nymphalid butterfly Chlosyne californica (Lepidoptera). Am Mid Nat 113(1):69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1987) Leks and hilltopping in insects. J Nat Hist 21:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J, O'Neill K (1987) Territory preferences and intensity of competition in the grey hairstreak Strymon melinus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and the tarantula hawk wasp Hemipepsis ustulata (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Am Mid Nat 118(1):128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behavior 17:130–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimentel D (ed) Insects, Science and Society. Academic Press, New York, p 284

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RR (1983) Insect territoriality. Ann Rev Entomol 28:65–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Baughman JF, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR (1988) Population structure in a hilltopping butterfly. Oecologia 75:593–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein C (1980) Density-dependent changes in sex ratio in Colias lesbia (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Ecol Ent 5:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1977) Lek mating behavior in the hammer-headed bat. Z Tierpsych 45:225–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1979) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural Selection and Social Behavior. Chiron Press

  • Bradbury JW (1985) Contrasts between insects and vertebrates in the evolution of male display, female choice, and lek mating. Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Exp Behav Ecol. Fischer, pp 273–289

  • Brown JL, Orians GH (1970) Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1:239–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck J, Buck E (1976) Synchronous fireflies. Sci Am 234(5):74–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter CR (1958) Territoriality: a review of concepts and problems. In: Roc A, Simpson GG (eds) Behavior and Evolution. Yale Univ Press, pp 224–250

  • Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1991) A comparison of population structure and habitat selection in neighboring populations of the subalpine butterfly Oeneis chryxus (in press)

  • Davies NB (1978a) Ecological questions about territorial behavior. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, Blackwell Press, pp 317–350

  • Davies NB (1978b) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Parage aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries PJ (1978) Observations on the apparent lek behavior in Costa Rican rainforest Perrhybris pyrrha Cramer (Pieridae). J Res Lep 17(3):142–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards WH (1897) The Butterflies of North America (The Riverside Press, Cambridge), Third Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (1984) The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich AH, Ehrlich PR (1978) Reproductive strategies in butterflies. I. Mating frequency, plugging, and egg number. J Kansas ent Soc 51:666–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Wheye D (1986) “Nonadaptive” hilltopping behavior in male checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas editha). Am Nat 127:477–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Wheye D (1988) Hilltopping checkerspot butterflies revisited. Am Nat 132(3):460–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, White PR, Singer MC, McKechnie SW, Gilbert LE (1975) Checkerspot butterflies: a historical perspective. Science 188:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Launer AE, Murphy DD (1984) Can sex ratio be defined or determined? The case of a population of checkerspot butterflies. Am Nat 124(4):527–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickwort G (1977) Male territorial behavior in the mason bee Hoplitis anthocopoides (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Anim Behav 25:542–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1986) Male and female mating strategies on sage grouse leks. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution. Princeton U Press, pp 379–398

  • Hölldobler B (1976) The behavioral ecology of mating in harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:405–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovanitz W (1940) Ecological color variation in a butterfly and the problem of “protective coloration”. Ecology 21(3):371–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson M (1966) Chemical insect attractants and repellents. Ann Rev Entomol 11:403–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly GM (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration — stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimsey LS (1980) The behavior of male orchid bees (Apidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and the question of leks. Anim Behav 28:996–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapton RW (1985) Lek strukture and territoriality in the chryxus arctic butterfly, Oeneis chryxus (Satyridae) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:389–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Harvey PH (1988) Lekking in Florence. Nature 333:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederhouse RC (1982) Territorial defense and lek behaviour of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JE (1973) Fireflies of melanesia: bioluminescence, mating behavior, and synchronous flashing (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Environ Entomol 2:991–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore NW (1964) Intra- and inter-specific competition among dragonflies (Odonata) J Anim Ecol 33:49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendaal FJ, Iwasa Y, Ehrlich PR (1985) Duration of female availability and its effect on butterfly mating systems Am Nat 125:673–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendaal FJ, Turchin P, Stermitz FR (1988) An incidental-effect hypothesis explaining aggregation of males in a population of Euphydryas anicia Am Nat 132 (5):735–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1978) Evolution of competitive mate searching. Ann Rev Entomol 23:173–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons PA (1977) Lek behavïor in Drosophila (Hirtodrosophila) polypori Malloch — an Australian rainforest species. Evol 31:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka FA (1959) Numbers, breeding schedule, and territoriality in pectoral sandpipers of northern Alaska. Condor 61:233–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL, Alcock J, Carey M (1989) Hilltopping in the Pipevine Swallowtail Butterfly (Battus philenor). Ethology 82:244–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JA (1973) Convergence of population biology and adult behavior in two sympatric butterflies, Neominois ridingsii (Papilionoidea: Nymphalidae) and Amblyscirtes simius (Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae). J Anim Ecol 42:663–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JA (1986) The Butterflies of North America. Stanford Univ Press

  • Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields O (1967) Hilltopping. J Res Lepid 6:69–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Wedlake P (1981) Capture does affect probability of recapture in a butterfly species. Ecol Ent 6:215–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth HT (1968) Evolutionary implications of sexual behavior in Drosophila Evol Biol 2:157–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth HT (1974) Courtship behavior in Drosophila Ann Rev Entomol 19:385–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft CA (1989a) Population structure and mating system of a desert bee fly (Lordotus pulchrissimus; Diptera: Bombyliidae). 1. Male demography and interactions. Oikos 54:345–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft CA (1989b) Population structure and mating system of a desert bee fly (Lordotus pulchrissimus; Diptera: Bombyliidae). 2. Female demography, copulations and characteristics of swarm sites Oikos 54:359–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt WB, Chew FS, Snyder LRG, Watt AG, Rothschild DE (1977) Population structure of pierid butterflies. I. Numbers and movements of some montane Colias species Oecologia 27:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickman P, Wiklund C (1983) Territorial defense and its seasonal decline in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria) Anim Behav 31:1206–1216

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis MA, Birch MC (1982) Male lek formation and female calling in a population of the arctiid moth Estigmene acrea Science 218:168–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates D, Dodson G (1990) The mating system of a bee fly (Diptera: Bombyliidae). I. Non-resource-based hilltop territoriality and a resource-based alternative. J Insect Behav 3(5):603–611

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R. & Wheye, D. Determinants of spatial distribution in a population of the subalpine butterfly Oeneis chryxus . Oecologia 88, 587–596 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317724

Key words

Navigation