Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 331–339 | Cite as

Interaction of pH, density, and priority effects on the survivorship and growth of two species of hylid tadpoles

  • Susan C. Warner
  • William A. Dunson
  • Joseph Travis
Original Papers

Summary

We examined the interactions of an abiotic factor (pH) and a biotic factor (density) on the survival and growth of two species of anuran larvae (Hyla gratiosa and Hyla femoralis) in outdoor tanks. Three levels of pH (4.3, 4.6, or 6.0) and three levels of density (0, 30 or 60 embryos) were arranged in a blocked design and replicated three times for Hyla gratiosa. At the end of this experiment the effects of pH (4.3, 4.6, or 6.0), density of H. femoralis (30 or 60), and prior use by H. gratiosa (at 0, 30, or 60 larvae per tank) on the survival and growth of H. femoralis, were examined. Higher density increased larval period and decreased size at metamorphosis of H. gratiosa. Lower pH decreased survival rate and also decreased size at metamorphosis. Body sodium concentrations were lowest at the low pH values. Lower pH increased the susceptibility of H. gratiosa tadpoles to the adverse effects of higher densities. For H. femoralis higher density decreased survival, increased larval period and decreased size at metamorphosis. Hyla femoralis also had lower survivorship at low pH and exhibited decreased size at metamorphosis. However, unlike the results with Hyla gratiosa, there were no interactive effects between pH and density for any of the life-history traits studied. The effect of previous colonization by H. gratiosa on H. femoralis survival was facilitative. Body sodium concentrations of H. femoralis were lowest at the highest pH value. Metamorphs of the same size had much lower levels of sodium in H. femoralis than H. gratiosa. In general, H. femoralis was less affected by pH variation than H. gratiosa. These results demonstrate that abiotic factors can interact strongly with biotic effects such as density and they suggest that interspecific interactions can be strongly modulated by the background abiotic environment.

Key words

Low pH Density dependence Abiotic factors Amphibian communities Mesocosms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alford RA, Harris RN (1988) Effects of larval growth history on anuran metamorphosis. Am Nat 131(1):91–106Google Scholar
  2. Alford RA, Wilbur HM (1985) Priority effects in experimental pond communities: competition between Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66(4):1097–1105Google Scholar
  3. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation (1976) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 14th edition. American Public Health Association. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Berven KA (1990) Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71(4):1599–1608Google Scholar
  5. Cairns J Jr (1983) Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental hazard? Hydrobiologia 100:47–57Google Scholar
  6. Cummins CP (1986) Effects of aluminium and low pH on growth and development in Rana temporaria tadpoles. Oecologia 69:248–252Google Scholar
  7. Cummins CP (1989) Interaction between the effects of pH and density on growth and development in Rana temporaria L. tadpoles. Funct Ecol 3:45–52Google Scholar
  8. Damman H (1989) Facilitative interactions between two lepidopteran herbivores of Asimina. Oecologia 78:214–219Google Scholar
  9. Dunham AE, Grant BW, Overall KL (1989) Interfaces between biophysical and physiological ecology and the population ecology of terrestrial vertebrate ectotherms. Physiol Zool 62(2):335–355Google Scholar
  10. Dunnett CW (1980) Pairwise multiple comparisons in the homogeneous variance, unequal sample size case. J Am Stat Assoc 75(372):789–795Google Scholar
  11. Dunson WA, Heatwole H (1986) Effects of relative shell size in turtles on water and electrolyte composition. Am J Physiol 250 (Regulatory Integative Comp Physiol 19): R1133-R1137Google Scholar
  12. Dunson WA, Travis J (1991) The role of abiotic factors in community organization. Am Nat (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Dunson WA, Packer RK, Dunson MK (1971) Ion and water balance in normal and mutant fluid imbalanced (ff) embryos of the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Comp Biochem Physiol 40A:319–337Google Scholar
  14. Freda J (1986) The influence of acidic pond water on amphibians: a review. Water, Air Soil Poll 30:439–450Google Scholar
  15. Freda J, Dunson WA (1984) Sodium balance of amphibian larvae exposed to low environmental pH. Physiol Zool 57(4):435–443Google Scholar
  16. Freda J, Dunson WA (1985) Field and laboratory studies of ion balance and growth rates of ranid tadpoles chronically exposed to low pH. Copeia 1985(2):415–423Google Scholar
  17. Freda J, Dunson WA (1986) Effects of low pH and other chemical variables on the local distribution of amphibians. Copeia 1986(2):454–466Google Scholar
  18. Frisbie MP, Wyman RL (1991) The effects of soil acidity on sodium balance in Plethodon cinereus and three other terrestrial salamanders. Physiol Zool (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Gosner KL, Black IH (1957) The effects of acidity on the development and hatching of New Jersey frogs. Ecology 38:256–262Google Scholar
  20. Ireland PH (1991) Separate effects of acid-derived anions and cations on growth of larval Ambystoma maculatum. Copeia 1991(1):132–137Google Scholar
  21. Jaeger RG, Walls SC (1989) On salamander guilds and ecological methodology. Herpetologica 45:111–119Google Scholar
  22. Kingsolver JG (1989) Weather and the population dynamics of insects: Integrating physiological and population ecology. Physiol Zool 62(2):314–334Google Scholar
  23. Ling RW, Van Amberg JP, Werner JK (1986) Pond acidity and its relationship to larval development of Ambystoma maculatum and Rana sylvatica in upper Michigan. J Herpet 20:230–236Google Scholar
  24. Morin PJ (1981) Predatory salamanders reverse the outcome of competition among three species of anuran tadpoles. Science 212:1284–1286Google Scholar
  25. Morin PJ (1983) Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol Monogr 53(2):119–138Google Scholar
  26. Morin PJ (1986) Interactions between intraspecific competition and predation in an amphibian predator-prey system. Ecology 67(3):713–720Google Scholar
  27. Morin PJ (1987) Predation, breeding asynchrony, and the outcome of competition among trefrog tadpoles. Ecology 68(3):675–683Google Scholar
  28. Picker MD (1985) Hybridization and habitat selection in Xenopus gilli and Xenopus laevis in the South-western Cape Province. Copeia 1985(3):574–580Google Scholar
  29. Poulin R, Fitzgerald GJ (1989) Early life histories of three sympatric sticklebacks in a salt-marsh. J Fish Biol 34:207–221Google Scholar
  30. Schoener TW (1986) Mechanistic approaches to community ecology: A new reductionisms? Am Zool 26:81–106Google Scholar
  31. Semlitsch RD, Scott DE, Pechmann JHK (1988) Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69(1):184–192Google Scholar
  32. Smith DC (1983) Factors controlling tadpole populations of the chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) on Isle Royale, Michigan. Ecology 64:501–510Google Scholar
  33. Smith DC (1987) Adult recruitment in chorus frogs: effects of size and date on metamorphosis. Ecology 68:344–350Google Scholar
  34. Travis J (1980) Phenotypic variation and the outcome of interspecific competition in hylid tadpoles. Evolution 34(1):40–50Google Scholar
  35. Travis J (1983) Variation in growth and survival of Hyla gratiosa larvae in experimental enclosures. Copeia 1983(1):232–237Google Scholar
  36. Travis J, Trexler JC (1986) Interactions among factors affecting growth development and survival in experimental populations of Bufo terrestris (Anura: Bufonidae). Oecologia 69:110–116Google Scholar
  37. Travis J, Keen WH, Julianna J (1985) The effects of multiple factors affecting viability selection in Hyla gratiosa tadpoles. Evolution 39(5):1087–1099Google Scholar
  38. Walter H (1973) Vegetation of the earth in relation to climate and the ecophysiological conditions. Springer-Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Werner EE (1986) Amphibian metamorphosis: Growth rate, predation, risk, and the optimal size at transformation. Am Nat 128(3):319–341Google Scholar
  40. Wilbur HM (1977) Interactions of food level and population density in Rana sylvatica. Ecology 58:206–209Google Scholar
  41. Wilbur HM (1980) Complex life cycles. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 11:67–93Google Scholar
  42. Wilbur HM (1982) Competition between tadpoles of Hyla femoralis and Hyla gratiosa in laboratory experiments. Ecology 63(2):278–282Google Scholar
  43. Wilbur HM (1984) Complex life cycles and community organization in amphibians. In: Price PW, Slobodchikoff CN, Gaud WS (eds) A new ecology: novel approaches to interactive systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 195–226Google Scholar
  44. Wilbur HM, Alford RA (1985) Priority effects in experimental pond communities: responses of Hyla to Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66(4):1106–1114Google Scholar
  45. Williams KS, Myers JH (1984) Previous herbivore attack of red alder may improve food quality for fall webworm larvae. Oecologia 63:166–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan C. Warner
    • 1
  • William A. Dunson
    • 1
  • Joseph Travis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, 208 Mueller LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations