Oecologia

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 342–347 | Cite as

A comparison of phosphorus and nitrogen transfer between plants of different phosphorus status

  • D. M. Eissenstat
Original Papers

Summary

This study has two objections: (1) to compare transfers of phosphorus (32P) with nitrogen (15N) from undefoliated and defoliated mycorrhizal P-rich plants to an adjacent mycorrhizal plant and (2) to determine whether the improved nutrient status of a plant growing with a nutrient-rich plant is due primarily to movement of nutrients from roots of its nutrient-rich neighbor (= nutrient transfer) or to reduced nutrient uptake by its nutrient-rich neighbor (=shift in competition). Two plants of Plantago lanceolata were grown in a three-pot unit in which each of their root systems were split, with part in the central shared pot and part by themselves in an outside pot. There were three treatments: (1) no added P; (2) P added in the outer pot to only plant, termed the “donor” plant, since it might provide P to the companion plant, acting as a “receiver”; and (3) as in the previous treatment but the P-fertilized donor plant was also clipped. To encourage the formation of hyphal links between roots of the different plants, transfers were determined when root length densities were high (90 to 130 cm cm-3 soil) and when 56 to 85% of the root length was infected with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Phosphorus fertilization enhanced P but not N movement within donor plants. Regardless of treatment, N transfer from donor to receiver plants was an order of magnitude greater than P transfer and in amounts that could potentially affect plant nutrition in very infertile soils. Phosphorus transfer was very small in any of the treatments. Although P fertilization and clipping improved P status of receiver plants, P transfer was not indicated as the main reason for the improved nutrition. A shift in competition between donor and receiver plants was likely the major factor in the shift in nutrition of the receiver plants.

Key words

Competition Defoliation Nutrient transfer Nutrient cycling Plantago lanceolata 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brundrett MC, Piche Y, Peterson RL (1984) A new method of observing the morphology of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Can J Bot 62:2128–2134Google Scholar
  2. Caldweil MM, Richards JH, Manwaring JH, Eissenstat DM (1987) Rapid shifts in phosphate acquisition show direct competition between neighbouring plants. Nature 327:615–616Google Scholar
  3. Chiariello N, Hickman JC, Mooney HA (1982) Endomycorrhizal role for interspecific transfer of phosphorus in a community of annual plants. Science 217:941–943Google Scholar
  4. Crider F (1955) Root-growth stoppage resulting from defoliation. USDA Tech Bull No 1102Google Scholar
  5. Davidson JL, Milthorpe FL (1966) The effect of defoliation on the carbon balance in Dactylis glomerata. Ann Bot 30:185–198Google Scholar
  6. Farquhar GD, Wetselaar R, Weir B (1983) Gaseous nitrogen losses from plants. In: Freney JR, Simpson JR (eds) Gaseous loss of nitrogen from plant-soil systems, Nijhoff/Junk, Boston, pp 159–180Google Scholar
  7. Finlay RD, Read DJ (1986) The structure and function of the vegetative mycelium of ectomycorrhizal plants. I. Translocation of 14C-labelled carbon between plants interconnected by a common mycelium. New Phytol 103:143–156Google Scholar
  8. Francis R, Read DJ (1984) Direct transfer of carbon between plants connected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium. Nature 307:53–56Google Scholar
  9. Francis R, Finlay RD, Read DJ (1986) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation systems. IV. Transfer of nutrients in inter- and intra-specific combinations of host plants. New Phytol 102:103–111Google Scholar
  10. Gay PE, Grubb PJ, Hudson HJ (1982) Seasonal changes in the concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and in the density of mycorrhiza, in biennial and matrix-forming perennial species of closed chalkland turf. J Ecol 70:571–593Google Scholar
  11. Giovannetti M, Mosse B (1980) An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84:489–500Google Scholar
  12. Grime JP, Hunt R (1975) Relative growth rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J Ecol 63:393–422Google Scholar
  13. Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ (1987) Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature 328:420–422Google Scholar
  14. Haystead A, Malajczuk N, Grove TS (1988) Underground transfer of nitrogen between pasture plants infected with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 108:417–423Google Scholar
  15. Heap AJ, Newman EI (1980) Links between roots by hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytol 85:169–171Google Scholar
  16. Jameson DA (1963) Responses of individual plants to harvesting. Bot Rev 29:532–594Google Scholar
  17. Jupp AP, Newman EI, Ritz K (1987) Phosphorus turnover in soil and its uptake by established Lolium perenne plants. J Appl. Ecol 24:969–978Google Scholar
  18. Kessel C van, Singleton PW, Hoben HJ (1985) Enhanced N-transfer from a soybean to maize by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi. Plant Physiol 79:562–563Google Scholar
  19. Ledgard SF, Freney JR, Simpson JR (1985) Assessing nitrogen transfer from legumes to associated grasses. Soil Biol Biochem 17:575–577Google Scholar
  20. Newman EI (1966) A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J Appl. Ecol 3:139–145Google Scholar
  21. Newman EI (1988) Mycorrhizal links between plants: their functioning and ecological significance. Adv Ecol Res 18:243–270Google Scholar
  22. Read DJ, Francis R, Finlay RD (1985) Mycorrhizal mycelia and nutrient cycling in plant communities. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (eds) Ecological interactions in soil, Blackwell Scientific, Boston, pp 193–217Google Scholar
  23. Richards JH (1984) Root growth response to defoliation in two Agropyron bunchgrasses: field observations with an improved root periscope. Oecologia (Berlin) 64:21–25Google Scholar
  24. Ritz K, Newman EI (1986) Nutrient transport between ryegrass plants differing in nutrient status. Oecologia (Berlin) 70:128–131Google Scholar
  25. Sims PL, Singh JS (1978) The structure and function of ten western North American grasslands. III. Net primary production, turnover and efficiencies of energy capture and water use. J Ecol 66:573–597Google Scholar
  26. Tennant D (1975) A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63:995–1001Google Scholar
  27. Turner SM, Newman EI (1984) Fungal abundance on Lolium perenne roots: influence of nitrogen and phosphorus. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 82:315–322Google Scholar
  28. Whitehead DC (1970) The role of nitrogen in grassland productivity. Commonwealth Agric Bureau Bull 48, Hurley, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  29. Whittingham J, Read DJ (1982) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation systems. III. Nutrient transfer between plants with mycorrhizal interconnections. New Phytol 90:277–284Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Eissenstat
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.IFAS, Citrus Research and Education CenterUniversity of FloridaLake AlfredUSA

Personalised recommendations