Skip to main content
Log in

Do cattle egrets gain information from conspecifics when foraging?

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We examined whether individual cattle egrets (Bubulcus ibis) base their decisions of where to forage, and how long to stay in a patch, on the behavior of other flock members. Cattle egrets commonly forage in flocks associated with cattle and capture prey at higher rates when they do not share a cow with another egret. Foraging egrets provide cues of the location of prey and their success in capturing prey. Therefore, there is the possibility of information transfer between egrets in a flock. We predicted that egrets should only move to occupied patches when the resident was capturing enough prey that it is profitable for the invader to share the patch or take over the patch. However, egrets did not seem to decide where to forage based on neighbors' rates of energy intake, but rather on the presence or absence of conspecifics in a patch. We also predicted that an egret should remain in a patch until its rate of energy intake dropped to or below the average rate for other egrets within the flock. However, egrets that were foraging more efficiently than the average rate for the flock switched patches sooner than less efficient foragers. Egrets did not appear to increase foraging success by gaining information on patch quality from neighbors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blaker D (1969) Behaviour of the Cattle Egret Ardeola ibis. Ostrich 40:75–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Pop Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore JJ (1973) Foraging success of Cattle Egrets, Bubulcus ibis. Am Midl Nat 89:242–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb JA (1958) Predation by tits and squirrels on the eucosmid Ernarmonia conicolana (Heyl.). J Anim Ecol 27:375–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L (1986) Exchangeable producer and scrounger roles in a captive flock of feral pigeons: a case for the skill pool effect. Anim Behav 34:797–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RF (1984) Stopping rules for optimal foragers. Am Nat 123:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb TC (1976) Adaptiveness of foraging in the Cattle Egret. Wilson Bull 88:145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanebrink EL (1971) Food, feeding behaviour and extension of range of the Cattle Egret. Migrant 42:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Heatwole H (1965) Some aspects of the association of Cattle Egrets with cattle. Anim Behav 13:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenni DA (1969) A study of the ecology of four species of herons during the breeding season at Lake Alice, Alachua County, Florida Ecol Monogr 39:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1973) Behavioral aspects of predation. In: Bateson PPH, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol. 1, Plenum, New York, pp 73–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, McCleery RH (1984) Optimization in Behavioural Ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, MacRoberts M, Cullen J (1972) Flocking and feeding in the great tit Parus major: an experimental study. Ibis 114:507–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Ryan JC, Charnov EL (1974) Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study of patch use by chickadees. Anim Behav 22:953–964

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair JN (1982) Optimal giving-up times and the marginal value theorem. Am Nat 119:511–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerriecks AJ (1962) Diversity typifies heron feeding. Nat Hist 71:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D (1984) The feeding success of cattle egrets in flocks. Anim Behav 32:1089–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried WR (1971) Feeding activity of the Cattle Egret. Ardea 59:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp 170–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson CF, Lanyon SM, Thompson KM (1982) The influence of foraging benefits on association of Cattle Egrets (Bubulcus ibis) with cattle. Oecologia 52:167–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ (1989) Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56:357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (1979) Foraging for patchily distributed hosts by the parasitoid, Nemeritis canescens. J Anim Ecol 48:353–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC (1984) Great tits and giving-up times: decision rules for leaving patches. Behaviour 90:1–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metz, K.J., Prior, K.A. & Mallory, M.L. Do cattle egrets gain information from conspecifics when foraging?. Oecologia 86, 57–61 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317389

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317389

Kew words

Navigation