, Volume 92, Issue 2, pp 229–235 | Cite as

The effects of fire on scarlet gilia: an alternative selection pressure to herbivory?

  • Ken N. Paige
Original Papers


The primary goals of this paper were to experimentally assess the relative importance of fire, a potentially important selective agent involved in shaping scarlet gilia's compensatory response and, in general, determine scarlet gilia's response to fire. Burn treatment results demonstrated that fire was not an important selective agent involved in shaping scarlet gilia's compensatory response. The most common response to fire was the production of one or more new clonally derived rosettes. This was an unexpected result; this typically monocarpic herb rarely produces clonal offspring. Although rosette production lessened the detrimental effects of fire by giving plants that cloned a second chance to flower, these newly formed rosettes delayed flowering for at least one year and had significantly higher overwinter mortality rates than rosettes from unburned control plots. In addition, significantly fewer individuals from the burn treatments flowered and there was significantly higher immediate mortality. There was, however, no detrimental effect on the reproductive success (seed production) of individuals that flowered following the burn. Overall, cumulative estimates of plant performance suggest that at the population level fire results in a 4.5-fold decrease in relative plant fitness. However, fire-induced seed germination could negate the detrimental effects of fire on the population dynamics of scarlet gilia. In the year of the burn there was a 116-fold increase in the number of germinating seeds and by the second year this translated into an approximate 6-fold difference in the number of surviving rosettes. Two alternative candidates, frost damage and ungulate trampling, can cause the removal of apical dominance and a response similar to that generated by ungulate and insect herbivores. However, they are probably minor factors favoring selection toward growth compensation; experimental and observational results deomonstrate that apical dominance was removed in only 3% of plants exposed to freezing temperatures and ungulate trampling caused breakage and release of apical dominance in only 0.2% of plants.

Key words

Overcompensation Herbivory Fire Clonally derived offspring Ipomopsis aggregata 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Benner BL (1988) Effects of apex removal and nutrient supplementation on branching and seed production in Thlaspi arvense (Brassicaceae). Am J Botany 75: 645–651Google Scholar
  2. Cooper CF (1960) Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecol Monogr 30: 129–164Google Scholar
  3. Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL, Mercier T (1985) Pollen limitation in a monocarpic species, Ipomopsis aggregata. J Ecol 73: 263–270Google Scholar
  4. Hendrix SD (1979) Compensatory reproduction in a biennial herb following insect defloration. Oecologia 42: 107–118Google Scholar
  5. James S (1984) Lignotubers and burls — their structure, function and ecological significance in Mediterranean ecosystems. Bot Rev 50: 225–266Google Scholar
  6. Lubchenco J, Cubit J (1980) Heteromorphic life histories of certain marine algae as adaptations to variations in herbivory. Ecology 61: 676–687Google Scholar
  7. Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Natural 134: 1–19Google Scholar
  8. Melgoza G, Nowak RS, Tausch RJ (1990) Soil water exploitation after fire: competition between Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) and two native species. Oecologia 83: 7–13Google Scholar
  9. Moreno JM, Oechel WC (1991) Fire intensity and herbivory effects on postfire resprouting of Adenostoma fasciculatum in southern California chaparral. Oecologia 85: 429–433Google Scholar
  10. Paige KN (1992) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: from mutualistic to antagonistic interactions. Ecology (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Paige KN, Whitham TG (1985) Individual and population shifts in flower color by scarlet gilia: a mechanism for pollinator tracking. Science 227: 315–317Google Scholar
  12. Paige KN, Whitham TG (1987a) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am Natural 129: 407–416Google Scholar
  13. Paige KN, Whitham TG (1987b) Flexible life history traits: shifts by scarlet gilia in response to pollinator abundance. Ecology 68: 1691–1695Google Scholar
  14. Raison RJ (1979) Modification of the soil environment by vegetation fires, with particular reference to nitrogen transformations: a review. Plant Soil 51: 73–108Google Scholar
  15. Rundel PW, Baker GA, Parsons DJ, Stohlgren TJ (1987) Postfire demography of resprouting and seedling establishment by Adenostoms fasciculatum in the California chaparral. In: Tenhunen JD, Catarino FM, Lange OL, Oechel WC (eds), Plant Response to Stress — Functional Analysis in Mediterranean Ecosystems Series G: Ecological Sciences, vol 15. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York pp 575–596Google Scholar
  16. Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol System 17: 667–693Google Scholar
  17. Turkington R (1983) Plasticity in growth and patterns of dry matter distribution of two genotypes of Trifolium repens grown in different environments of neighbors. Can J Bot 61: 2186–2194Google Scholar
  18. White AS (1985) Presettlement regeneration patterns in a southwestern ponderosa pine stand. Ecology 66: 589–594Google Scholar
  19. Whitham TG, Maschinski J, Larson KC, Paige KN (1991) Plant responses to herbivory: the continuum from negative to positive and underlying physiological mechanisms. In: Price PW, Lewinsohn TW, Benson WW, Fernandez GW (eds) Plant-animal interactions: evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. Wiley, New York, pp 227–256Google Scholar
  20. Wright HA, Bailey AW (1982) Fire ecology. United States and Southern Canada. Wiley and Sons, New York p 510Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken N. Paige
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Environmental Studies, Department of Ecology, Ethology and EvolutionUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations