Skip to main content

Determinants of seed production in Geranium maculatum

Summary

We experimentally examined factors limiting seed production in two populations of the perennial woodland herb Geranium maculatum in central Illinois, USA. To test the pollinator-limitation hypothesis, we compared the seed production of plants whose flowers were supplementarily pollinated with outcross pollen to that of control plants receiving natural pollination only. To test if fruit production by early flowers suppresses fruit and seed formation by late flowers, a third group of plants was prevented from producing seed from the first 50% of the flowers to open (stigmas were excised at flower opening). Finally, to test if seed maturation and flower initiation are correlated with photosynthetic capacity, we performed a defoliation experiment in which either the stem leaves within the inflorescence, the stem leaves below the inflorescence, or the rosette leaves were removed during late flowering. Plants that reccived supplemental pollination produced 1.5–1.6 times more seeds than control plants. We found no difference between hand-pollinated plants and controls in mortality, flowering frequency or number of flowers produced in the year following the experiment. In both control and hand-pollinated plants, the fruit set and total seed production of early flowers were more than twice as high as those of late flowers. In one of the two populations, plants whose early flowers were prevented from setting seed produced significantly more seeds from their late flowers than did control plants. Seed predation was low and did not differ between early and late flowers. Leaf removal did not affect seed number or size in the year of defoliation, nor did it reduce survival or flower production in the subsequent year. This suggests that the plants were able to compensate for a partial defoliation by using stored resources or by increasing photosynthetic rates in the remaining leaves. Taken together, the results demonstrate that both pollinator activity and resource levels influence patterns of seed production in G. maculatum. While seed production was pollinatorlimited in both populations, a seasonal decline in resource availability was apparently responsible for the low seed production by late flowers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ågren J (1988) Between-year variation in flowering and fruit set in frost-prone and frost-sheltered populations of dioecious Rubus chamaemorus. Oecologia 76:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Ågren J, Willson MF (1991) Gender variation and sexual differences in reproductive characters and seed production in gynodioecious Geranium maculatum. Am J Bot 78:470–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1989) Impact of insect predation on ovule survivorship in Eucalyptus baxteri. J Ecol 77:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Beare MH (1983) Breeding system and pollination ecology of Trientalis borealis (Primulaceae). Am J Bot 70:408–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayre DJ, Whelan RJ (1989) Factors controlling fruit set in hermaphroditic plants: studies with the Australian Proteaceae. Trends Ecol Evol 4:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Helenurm K (1987) The reproductive biology of boreal forest herbs. I. Breeding systems and pollination. Can J Bot 65:2036–2046

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P (1982) The demography of Jack-in-the-pulpit, a forest perennial that changes sex. Ecol Mon 52:335–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggess WR (1964) Trelease Woods, Champaign County, Illinois: woody vegetation and stand composition. Trans III State Acad Sci 57:261–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo RN, Horvitz CC (1990) Pollinator limitation, cost of reproduction, and fitness in plants: a transition-matrix demographic approach. Am Nat 136:499–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D (1989) Evolution of low female fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource allocation and genetic load. Trends Ecol Evol 4:289–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Copland BC, Whelan RJ (1989) Seasonal variation in flowering intensity and pollination limitation of fruit set in four co-occurring Banksia species. J Ecol 77:509–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlem TS, Boerner REF (1987) Effects of canopy light gap and early emergence on the growth and reproduction of Geranium maculatum. Can J Bot 65:242–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J (1991) Why do plants produce surplus flowers? a reserveovary model. Am Nat 138:918–933

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans EW, Smith CC, Gendron RP (1989) Timing of reproduction in a prairie legume: seasonal impacts of insects consuming flowers and seeds. Oecologia 78:220–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig D, Westoby M (1988) On limits to seed production. Am Nat 131:757–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC, Schemske DW (1988) A test of the pollinator limitation hypothesis for a neotropical herb. Ecology 69:200–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MO (1991) Pollen limitation of female reproduction in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Ecology 72:1500–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • Karoly K (1992) Pollinator limitation in the facultatively autogamous annual, Lupinus nanus (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 79:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak MM, Jennersten O (1991) Bumblebee visitation and seed set in Melampyrum pratense and Viscaria vulgaris: heterospecific pollen and pollen limitation. Oecologia 86:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD (1988) Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 179–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin SMC (1965) An ecological life history of Geranium maculatum. Am Midl Nat 73:111–149

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall C, Primack RB (1985) Effects of pollen and nitrogen availability on reproduction in a woodland herb, Lysimachia quadrifolia. Oecologia 67:403–410

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall C, Primack RB (1987) Resources limit the fecundity of three woodland herbs. Oecologia 71:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Hall P (1990) Costs of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid: a four-year experimental study. Am Nat 136:638–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Root TW, Geis JW, Boggess WR (1971) Woody vegetation of Hart Memorial Woods, Champaign County, Illinois. Trans Ill State Acad Sci 64:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (1977) Flowering phenology and seed set in Claytonia virginica (Portulaceae). Bull Torrey Bot Club 104:254–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW, Willson MF, Melampy MN, Miller LJ, Verner L, Schemske KM, Best LB (1978) Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology 59:351–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S (1986) Patterns of fruit-set: what controls fruit-flower ratios in plants? Evolution 40:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DD, O'Dowd DJ (1989) The effect of nutrients and inflorescence damage by insects on fruit-set by Banksia spinulosa. Oecologia 79:482–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson MA, Casper BB (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:233–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF, Burley N (1983) Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF, Miller LJ, Rathcke BJ (1979) Floral display in Phlox and Geranium: adaptive aspects. Evolution 33:52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF, Price PW (1980) Resource limitation on fruit and seed production in some Asclepias species. Can J Bot 58:2229–2233

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131:723–738

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ågren, J., Willson, M.F. Determinants of seed production in Geranium maculatum . Oecologia 92, 177–182 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317361

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317361

Key words

  • Geranium maculatum
  • Pollinator limitation
  • Resource limitation
  • Seed production
  • Temporal variability