Oecologia

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 74–79 | Cite as

The checkerboard score and species distributions

  • Lewi Stone
  • Alan Roberts
Original Papers

Summary

There has been an ongoing controversy over how to decide whether the distribution of species is “random” — i.e., whether it is not greatly different from what it would be if species did not interact. We recently showed (Roberts and Stone (1990)) that in the case of the Vanuatu (formerly New Hebrides) avifauna, the number of islands shared by species pairs was incompatible with a “random” null hypothesis. However, it was difficult to determine the causes or direction of the community's exceptionality. In this paper, the latter problem is examined further. We use Diamond's (1975) notion of checkerboard distributions (originally developed as an indicator of competition) and construct a C-score statistic which quantifies “checkerboardedness”. This statistic is based on the way two species might colonise a pair of islands; whenever each species colonises a different island this adds 1 to the C-score. Following Connor and Simberloff (1979) we generate a “control group” of random colonisation patterns (matrices), and use the C-score to determine their checkerboard characteristics. As an alternative mode of enquiry, we make slight alterations to the observed data, repeating this process many times so as to obtain another “control group”. In both cases, when we compare the observed data for the Vanuatu avifauna and the Antillean bat communities with that given by their respective “control group”, we find that these communities have significantly large checkerboard distributions, making implausible the hypothesis that their species distributions are a product of random colonisation.

Key words

Checkerboard pattern random colonisation Species interaction Community structure Bird distributions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker RJ, Genoways HH (1978) Zoogeography of Antillean bats. In Gill FB (ed) Zoogeography in the Caribbean: The 1975 Leidy Medal Symposium. Academy of Natural Sciences of Phildelphia, Philadelphia Pa, pp 53–97Google Scholar
  2. Connor EF, Simberloff D (1979) The assembly of species communities: Chance or competition? Ecology 60: 1132–1140Google Scholar
  3. Connor, EF, Simberloff D (1984) Neutral models of species' co-occurrence patterns. In: Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, USA, pp 316–331Google Scholar
  4. Diamond, JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In Cody, ML, Diamond, JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Harvard University, pp 342–444Google Scholar
  5. Diamond J, Gilpin ME (1982) Examination of the null model of Connor and Simberloff for species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52:64–74Google Scholar
  6. Diamond JM, Marshall AG (1976) Origin of the New Hebridean avifauna. Emu 76:187–200Google Scholar
  7. Gilpin ME, Diamond JM (1982) Factors contributing to non-randomness in species co-occurrences on islands. Oecologia 52:75–84Google Scholar
  8. Harvey PH, Colwell RK, Silvertown JW, May RM (1983) Null models in ecology. Ann Rey Ecol Syst 14:189–211Google Scholar
  9. Park SK, Miller KW (1988) Random number generators: good ones are hard to find. Communications of the Association for Comput Mach 31:1192–1201Google Scholar
  10. Roberts A, Stone L (1990) Island-sharing by archipelago species. Oecologia 83:560–567Google Scholar
  11. Saracino D (1980) Abstract algebra: a first course. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) (1984) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilson JB (1987) Methods for detecting non-randomness in species co-occurrences: a contribution. Oecologia 73:579–582Google Scholar
  14. Wright SJ, Biehl CC (1982) Island biogeographic distributions: Testing for random, regular and aggregated patterns of species occurrence. Am Nat 11:345–357Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lewi Stone
    • 1
  • Alan Roberts
    • 2
  1. 1.The Yigal Allon Kinneret Limnological LaboratoryIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological Research Ltd.TiberiasIsrael
  2. 2.Graduate School of Environmental ScienceMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.Division of Australian Environmental StudiesGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations