Skip to main content

Flower choice by honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): sex-phase of flowers and preferences among nectar and pollen foragers

Abstract

Bees foraging for nectar should choose different inflorescences from those foraging for both pollen and nectar, if inflorescences consist of differing proportions of male and female flowers, particularly if the sex phases of the flowers differ in nectar content as well as the occurrence of pollen. This study tested this prediction using worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) foraging on inflorescences of Lavandula stoechas. Female flowers contained about twice the volume of nectar of male flowers. As one would predict, bees foraging for nectar only chose inflorescences with disproportionately more female flowers: time spent on the inflorescence was correlated with the number of female flowers, but not with the number of male flowers. Inflorescence size was inversely correlated with the number of female flowers, and could be used as a morphological cue by these bees. Also as predicted, workers foraging for both pollen and nectar chose inflorescences with relatively greater numbers of both male and female flowers: time spent on these inflorescences was correlated with the number of male flowers, but not with the number of females flowers. A morphological cue inversely associated with such inflorescences is the size of the bract display. Choice of flowers within inflorescences was also influenced predictably, but preferences appeared to be based upon corolla size rather than directly on sex phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Barrow DA, Pickard RS (1984) Size-related selection of food plants by bumblebees. Ecol Entomol 9: 369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (1985) On the function of flowers. Proc R Soc Lond B 224: 223–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell G, Lefebvre L, Giraldeau L-A, Weary D (1984) Partial preference of insects for the male flowers of an annual herb. Oecologia 64: 287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackith RE, Reyment RA, Campbell NC (1979) Multivariate morphometrics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Búrquez A, Corbet SA (1991) Do flowers reabsorb nectar? Funct Ecol 5: 369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron DL (1981) Chemical signals in bumble bee foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9: 257–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet SA, Kerslake CJC, Brown D, Morland NE (1984) Can bees select nectar-rich flowers in p patch? J Apic Res 23: 234–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell JE (1990) How and why do nectar-foraging bumblebees initiate movements between inflorescences of wild bergamot Monarda fistulosa (Lamiaceae)? Oecologia 82: 450–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Delph LF, Lively CM (1989) The evolution of floral colour change: pollinator attraction versus physiological constraints in Fuchsia excorticata. Evolution 43: 1252–1262

    Google Scholar 

  • Devesa JA, Arroyo J, Herrera J (1985) Contribucion al conocimiento de la biologia floral del genero Lavandula L. Anal Jardin Bot Madrid, 42: 165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield GE, Gibson RC, Gilhooly PM, Hesse AJ, Inkley CR, Gilbert FS, Barnard CJ (1993) Choice of flowers by foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera): possible morphological cues. Ecol Entomol 18: 191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1991) The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evol Ecol 5: 370–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart VM (1992) Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos 64: 573–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Newport MEA (1987) Bumble bee behavior and selection on flower size in the sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 74: 20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Plowright RW (1985) Contrasting movement patterns of nectar-collecting and pollen-collecting bumblebees (Bombus terricola) on fireweed (Chamaenerion angustifolium) inflorescences. Ecol Entomol 10: 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Geber MA (1985) The relationship of plant size to self-pollination in Mertensia ciliata. Ecology 66: 762–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Nuñez JA (1992) Hotteybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89: 123–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Nuñez JA (1993) Efficient floret inspection by honeybees in capitula of Carduus acanthoides. Ecol Entomol 18: 116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Greggers U, Menzel R (1993) Memory dynamics and foraging strategies of honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32: 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder LD (1988) Choice of individual flowers by bumblebees: interaction of morphology, time and energy. Behaviour 104: 60–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder LD, Cruzan MB (1990) An evaluation of the physiological and evolutionary influences of inflorescence size and flower depth on nectar production. Funct Ecol 4: 559–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera J (1991) Allocation of reproductive resources within and among inflorescences of Lavandula stoechas (Lamiaceae). Am J Bot 78: 789–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, de Bruyn GJ (1989) Plant size and pollinator visitation in Cynoglossum officinate. Oikos 54: 201–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkhamer PGL, Jong TJ de (1990) Effects of plant size, plant density and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Oikos 57: 399–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkhamer PGL, Jong TJ de (1993) Attractiveness to pollinators: a plant's dilemma. Oikos 66: 180–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1986) Multivariate statistical analysis: a primer. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden JH (1984a) Remote perception of floral nectar by bumble-bees. Oecologia 64: 232–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden JH (1984b) Intrapopulation variation in nectar secretion in Impatiens capensis. Oecologia 63: 418–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Meddis R (1984) Statistics using ranks. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ (1994) Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. Am Nat 143: 870–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz A, Devesa JA (1987) Contribucion al conocimiento de la biologia floral del genero Lavandula L. II. Lavandula stoechas L. subsp. stoechas. Anal Jardin Bot Madrid, 44: 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohara M, Higashi S (1994) Effects of inflorescence size on visits from pollinators and seed set of Corydalis ambigua (Papaveraceae). Oecologia 98: 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Kang H (1989) Measuring fitness and natural selection in wild plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20: 367–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Real L (1992) Information processing and the evolutionary ecology of cognitive architecture. Am Nat 140 (Suppl) 108–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyment RA (1971) Multivariate normality in morphometric analysis. Math Geol 3: 357–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt U, Bertsch A (1990) Do foraging bumblebees seent-mark food sources and does it matter? Oecologia 82: 137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology: a study of adaptation in social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1988) Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates on traplining pollinators of Aralia hispida. Evol Ecol 2: 65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Maddison WP, Plowright RC (1982) Behavior of bumple bee pollinators of Aralia hispida (Araliaceae). Oecologia 54: 326–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF, Agren J (1990) Differential food rewards and pollination by deceit in unisexual flowers. Oikos 55: 23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1982) The effect of nectar production on neigh-borhood size. Oecologia 52: 104–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1986) Reproduction in Polemonium: patterns and implications of floral nectar production and standing crop. Am J Bot 73: 1405–1415

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez, A., Rowe, C.L., Weeks, P.J. et al. Flower choice by honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): sex-phase of flowers and preferences among nectar and pollen foragers. Oecologia 101, 258–264 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317292

Key words

  • Apis mellifera
  • Lavandula stoechas
  • Pollen content
  • Nectar content
  • Foraging preference